"andrew cool" wrote in message
...
| IDON'T LIKE THIS BLP AT ALL. I JUST STARTED HF AND IT SOUNDS LIIKE THE
| FCC DOES'T CARE. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THIS?
|
| www.moveon.org stop the republicans!
| bush health care does not empower americans!

Your caps lock key is broken.
And if you think Moveon.org will stop the Republicans,
you've got a screw loose.

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04

dxAce wrote:

andrew cool wrote:


IDON'T LIKE THIS BLP AT ALL. I JUST STARTED HF AND IT SOUNDS LIIKE THE
FCC DOES'T CARE. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THIS?


Well, you can stop shouting! And it's BPL...

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I already cast my absentee ballot for George W. Bush

Shouldn't that read:

"I already cast my ballot for an absentee George W. Bush" ?

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

andrew cool wrote:


IDON'T LIKE THIS BLP AT ALL. I JUST STARTED HF AND IT SOUNDS LIIKE THE
FCC DOES'T CARE. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THIS?


Well, you can stop shouting! And it's BPL...

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I already cast my absentee ballot for George W. Bush

Shouldn't that read:

"I already cast my ballot for an absentee George W. Bush" ?

No.

Only proving yet again that you're a stupid Canadian 'tard boy.

LMAO at the Canadian excrement.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

:
: What has happened to the FCC interference protection standards, though?
: I am regularly seeing appliances for sale which can't even come close to
: meeting the Part 15 requirements for emission. Now we've got BPL coming
: down the pike, on top of all the touch lamps and noisy TV sets. Is there
: anyone at the FCC that cares about MW and HF use at all?


a bigger question should be what has happened to the FCC period (hint:
michael powell is no help). AM and FM interference "standards" went out
with the fairness doctrine. both bands have been totally ghettoized. fits
in nicely with the crud channel corporate sound of slop. no standards on
the technical side and no standards on the programming side. no wonder
listenership is down....

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...

What has happened to the FCC interference protection standards, though?
I am regularly seeing appliances for sale which can't even come close to
meeting the Part 15 requirements for emission.

You're right. Interference requirements seem to have to become a dead issue
in the last 10 or 15 years. It would be asking alot of the FCC to have them
start caring now.


Now we've got BPL coming
down the pike, on top of all the touch lamps and noisy TV sets. Is there
anyone at the FCC that cares about MW and HF use at all?

I don't think so.



I think BPL is a terrible idea, and I say that as someone who holds stock
in several power companies. But then, I thought VOIP was a terrible idea
also.
--scott


Are any of those power companies considering BPL? I'd worry about the
company ****ing away cash on a goofy idea.

Frank Dresser

In article gsadd.21040$cr4.3324@edtnps84,
m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

andrew cool wrote:


IDON'T LIKE THIS BLP AT ALL. I JUST STARTED HF AND IT SOUNDS LIIKE THE
FCC DOES'T CARE. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THIS?


Well, you can stop shouting! And it's BPL...

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I already cast my absentee ballot for George W. Bush

Shouldn't that read:

"I already cast my ballot for an absentee George W. Bush" ?

No, but you could say that about Kerry. He missed most of the Senate
votes this year.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Fuller Wrath" wrote in message
...

:


a bigger question should be what has happened to the FCC period (hint:
michael powell is no help). AM and FM interference "standards" went out
with the fairness doctrine. both bands have been totally ghettoized. fits
in nicely with the crud channel corporate sound of slop. no standards on
the technical side and no standards on the programming side. no wonder
listenership is down....



The fairness doctrine is interference. It was used as a political club.
Richard Nixon and the Republican party were using the so-called fairness
doctrine to go after the licenses of radio and TV properties of networks and
newspapers they didn't like. But Nixon didn't invent the tactic. It was
first used in the Kennedy administration. Given today's political
climate,I'm sure both parties would enthusiastically hammer the media
companies whenever embarrassing stories got out.

Is that really what you want?

There's a mistaken belief that dropping the fairness doctrine made right
wing political talk radio possible. That's not true. In Chicago, Howard
Miller had a greatly entertaining political talk show back in the early
seventies. Miller was to the right of Limbaugh, Hannity and Atilla the Hun.

Let's also consider who else gets treated shabbily by the fairness doctrine.
Who should determine what the audience should hear -- the government or the
audience?

Frank Dresser

:
: The fairness doctrine is interference. It was used as a political club.
: Richard Nixon and the Republican party were using the so-called fairness
: doctrine to go after the licenses of radio and TV properties of networks
and
: newspapers they didn't like. But Nixon didn't invent the tactic. It was
: first used in the Kennedy administration. Given today's political
: climate,I'm sure both parties would enthusiastically hammer the media
: companies whenever embarrassing stories got out.
:
: Is that really what you want?
:
: There's a mistaken belief that dropping the fairness doctrine made right
: wing political talk radio possible. That's not true. In Chicago, Howard
: Miller had a greatly entertaining political talk show back in the early
: seventies. Miller was to the right of Limbaugh, Hannity and Atilla the
Hun.
:
: Let's also consider who else gets treated shabbily by the fairness
doctrine.
: Who should determine what the audience should hear -- the government or
the
: audience?

1. The Fairness Doctrine could be resurrected and rewritten to assure a
balance of voices/opinions are heard on the public airwaves.
2. The audience has absolutely no input over what is heard on the airwaves
(with very limited exceptions). If you try to argue that broadcasters are
responding to market demands then the I.Q. factor in this country has
indeed fallen to the low double or even single digit range.
3. No, what I would really like to see is an ownership cap of seven to a
dozen stations per entity with no cross ownership. Then there might
actually be some creative programming and diversity - you know, like there
was for the first 75 years or so.... Imagine! stations with different
studios, different personnel, maybe even different program directors! Then
they wouldn't sell for over inflated amounts and we wouldn't get stripped
down, dumbed down voice-tracked generic dog-vomit programming!
4. Radio listenership is down by 15-20%. There's a reason for that

this isn't a poltoical post only asking about broadband over powerlines.
the only way i'd truly be for this is if they could do something to the
lines there using so that the radio wvaes or harmonics as i've read
won't be emitted out side the transmission lines?

www.moveon.org stop the republicans!
bush health care does not empower americans!

"andrew cool" wrote in message
...
| this isn't a poltoical post only asking about broadband over powerlines.
| the only way i'd truly be for this is if they could do something to the
| lines there using so that the radio wvaes or harmonics as i've read
| won't be emitted out side the transmission lines?
|
| www.moveon.org stop the republicans!
| bush health care does not empower americans!

The "move on" bull**** appearing at the bottom of your
post makes it a political post.

You might want to have a doctor provide some care - you
obviously suffer from acute rectocranial inversion.

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/9/04