= = = Sir Cumference wrote in message
= = = ...
Mr William Everfart III wrote:

On 26 Oct 2004 17:42:15 -0500, Dan wrote:


That's Dan Rather all over. He has *hated* the Bushes ever since
George H. W. Bush embarrassed him when he made his famous remark to
Rather about him walking off the stage when Wimbledon ran late.



True. Dan Rather has it out for Bush. So what? What's your problem
with it? He's entitled to his opinion.

He is not entitled to use the CBS network as a news reporter
to express his personal opinions. He is supposed to report
the news, not make it up.


SC,

I would not mind if Dan Rather took a moment to 'express' his
"Personal Opinion" or to make an "Editorial Statement" as long
as he makes it CLEAR that is what he is doing.

But... too often Dan Rather and others of the Liberal Media 'ELITE'
EXPRESS their "Personal Opinions" and make "Editorial Statements"
under the guise of a 'news item or story'.

So Say I - My Opinions Stated As Facts ~ RHF
..
..

Mr William Everfart III mis-wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:59:49 -0600, Sir Cumference
wrote:


Mr William Everfart III wrote:


On 26 Oct 2004 17:42:15 -0500, Dan wrote:



That's Dan Rather all over. He has *hated* the Bushes ever since
George H. W. Bush embarrassed him when he made his famous remark to
Rather about him walking off the stage when Wimbledon ran late.



True. Dan Rather has it out for Bush. So what? What's your problem
with it? He's entitled to his opinion.

He is not entitled to use the CBS network as a news reporter to express
his personal opinions. He is supposed to report the news, not make it up.



He certainly is entitled.

You got that wrong.

clifto wrote:

Dan wrote:

When exactly was Dan Blather a "White House stenographer"? Other
than during the Clinton regime, that is.


What about during the Carter blight?

Blather has been in the hip pocket of the simple minded dummycrat
liberas for years.

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:51:58 -0600, Sir Cumference
wrote:

Mr William Everfart III mis-wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:59:49 -0600, Sir Cumference
wrote:


Mr William Everfart III wrote:


On 26 Oct 2004 17:42:15 -0500, Dan wrote:



That's Dan Rather all over. He has *hated* the Bushes ever since
George H. W. Bush embarrassed him when he made his famous remark to
Rather about him walking off the stage when Wimbledon ran late.



True. Dan Rather has it out for Bush. So what? What's your problem
with it? He's entitled to his opinion.

He is not entitled to use the CBS network as a news reporter to express
his personal opinions. He is supposed to report the news, not make it up.



He certainly is entitled.

You got that wrong.


Nope

elmer fudd swanson wrote:



Just before the story about Al Qaqaa broke, the Bush-Cheney campaign
was frantically trying to debunk John Kerry's statement that Mr. Bush
let Osama bin Laden get away when he was cornered at Tora Bora. That
getaway, Mr. Kerry asserts, was possible because the administration
"outsourced" the job of closing off escape routes to local Afghan
warlords.

Clinton, the incompetent but sexually active, let Osama get away two
times. Had two chances to get him, but Clinton was too busy doing
strange things with cigars with Monica in the back office to be bothered
with Osama. Thanks to Clinton's incompetence and appeasement, Osama
rewarded us with 9/11.