Proof of explosives at Al Qaaqaa
 

TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

"David" wrote in message
...
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Nice try, but factually deficient as usual. Next time you might
actually try reading.

"5 EYEWITNESS NEWS e-mailed pictures of the material we found to
experts in Washington Wednesday to see if it is the same kind of high
explosives that went missing in Al Qaqaa. They could not make that
determination. "

Now why would they do this if what they found was "proof of explosives
at Al Qaqaa."?

On 28 Oct 2004 14:18:21 GMT, "Lloyd" wrote:

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:56:41 GMT, David wrote:
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Everyone agrees that there were ordinary explosives there, so that is
a non-story at this point in time. What is under "discussion" are
some special high explosives which U.N. inspectors had placed under
seal. There are no U.N. seals visible in any of those photographs,
and the story by a local TV station, breathless though it may be,
doesn't change a thing.

The special explosives were most probably removed before the war had
started. The latest claims are that they were of Russian manufacture,
and that the Russians removed them during the run-up to the war.

I don't know if I believe the latter claims, but I do believe that the
special explosives were long gone. It's the simplest explanation.


Ya gotta love "ordinary" explosives - real deadly without the bad rap
nukes get.

It doesn't matter if they are the ''same''. They are dangerous items
20 miles from Baghdad, easily used by the insurgency, and they were
unguarded. And Bush was moving the Army so quickly they left lots of
these sites unguarded and these materials are now being used against
us.

Incompetence.

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:04:49 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
.. .
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Nice try, but factually deficient as usual. Next time you might
actually try reading.

"5 EYEWITNESS NEWS e-mailed pictures of the material we found to
experts in Washington Wednesday to see if it is the same kind of high
explosives that went missing in Al Qaqaa. They could not make that
determination. "

Now why would they do this if what they found was "proof of explosives
at Al Qaqaa."?

David wrote:

It doesn't matter if they are the ''same''. They are dangerous items
20 miles from Baghdad, easily used by the insurgency, and they were
unguarded. And Bush was moving the Army so quickly they left lots of
these sites unguarded and these materials are now being used against
us.

Incompetence.

Incompetence. Hmmmmmm... I think incompetence was the fact that your daddy
didn't wear a condom, and your momma didn't use birth control.

How's that for incompetence?

I'm sure the brother and sister team are proud of their 'tard boy though.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

As if any of this has anything to do with Bush. Everyone with any military
knowledge knows that the military officers are the ones making the calls in
that situation. I can't understand how some people can actually believe that
the President is an actual "Military Planner". If you want to blame someone,
blame the leaders in the military.


"David" wrote in message
...
It doesn't matter if they are the ''same''. They are dangerous items
20 miles from Baghdad, easily used by the insurgency, and they were
unguarded. And Bush was moving the Army so quickly they left lots of
these sites unguarded and these materials are now being used against
us.

Incompetence.

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:04:49 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Nice try, but factually deficient as usual. Next time you might
actually try reading.

"5 EYEWITNESS NEWS e-mailed pictures of the material we found to
experts in Washington Wednesday to see if it is the same kind of high
explosives that went missing in Al Qaqaa. They could not make that
determination. "

Now why would they do this if what they found was "proof of explosives
at Al Qaqaa."?

"David" wrote in message
...
It doesn't matter if they are the ''same''. They are dangerous
items
20 miles from Baghdad, easily used by the insurgency, and they were
unguarded. And Bush was moving the Army so quickly they left lots
of
these sites unguarded and these materials are now being used against
us.

Incompetence.

Yes, it was highly incompetent of you to the title your post with
reference to the "controversial" explosives at Al Qaaqaa, and now try
to backpeddle furiously to cover the fact you were distorting the
whole issue with phony "proof"-----just like your candidate.

Of course you're equally wrong about who was "moving the Army" (as if
Bush makes the battle plan), but comapred to the first gaffe that's
pretty minor. I doubt he's an armchair general like those
complaining about moving fast.


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:04:49 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Nice try, but factually deficient as usual. Next time you might
actually try reading.

"5 EYEWITNESS NEWS e-mailed pictures of the material we found to
experts in Washington Wednesday to see if it is the same kind of
high
explosives that went missing in Al Qaqaa. They could not make that
determination. "

Now why would they do this if what they found was "proof of
explosives
at Al Qaqaa."?

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the brother and sister team are proud of their 'tard boy though.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


No way to talk about your own parents, hillbilly..

I see the word 'tard is engraved forever into your brain. Good luck. It
will NEVER go away and may well cause an even deeper psychosis than you
already have.

How's the ammunition gathering going Steve? Figure you'll have enough
for election day? Have the FBI been around to check out your sanity yet?




mike

David wrote:

TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

What kind of explosives?

"JuLiE Dxer" wrote in message
...
|
| What does this have to do with shortwave listening?

Apparently, no Midol was found at Al Qaaqaa.

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/04