Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 10th 04, 09:17 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default HQ-180

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...12425 83&rd=1

Looks like it might need a little TLC, but there you are.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

  #2   Report Post  
Old November 11th 04, 08:31 AM
Kachina 78
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ebay is how I got my HQ-180, two years ago. I got lucky, because it was
actually as listed; mint condition. Everything, including the clock, was in
perfect working order. There were several listed at the same time, but this one
was the cream of the crop, and the seller had an excellent rating. It didn't
come cheap though. A bidding war got it into my shack for $500.00, but it was
worth every penny. I hope you find one in similar condition to mine, because it
really is a great classic radio. Good DXing to you, Gary
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 11th 04, 08:16 PM
Michael Lawson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It actually looks in very good shape for getting it at an estate
sale. Might not have to do much of anything at all to it.

Man, if only I had the money...

--Mike L.

"Kachina 78" wrote in message
...
Ebay is how I got my HQ-180, two years ago. I got lucky, because it

was
actually as listed; mint condition. Everything, including the clock,

was in
perfect working order. There were several listed at the same time,

but this one
was the cream of the crop, and the seller had an excellent rating.

It didn't
come cheap though. A bidding war got it into my shack for $500.00,

but it was
worth every penny. I hope you find one in similar condition to mine,

because it
really is a great classic radio. Good DXing to you, Gary




  #4   Report Post  
Old November 13th 04, 08:28 AM
Kachina 78
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing to you, Gary
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 13th 04, 06:42 PM
John Barnard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep the circuits
aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will have vernier
tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory (I don't have
it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and R-390A and they
all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is that they
often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting leaky and sometimes
it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A). If you get a
chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy!

73

John Barnard

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing to you, Gary




  #6   Report Post  
Old November 14th 04, 03:05 AM
Michael Lawson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It also had sweet audio in general. I only got
to play with one for a couple of weeks, but man,
the thing I remember the most was the audio.

--Mike L.


"John Barnard" wrote in message
...
The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep

the circuits
aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will

have vernier
tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory

(I don't have
it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and

R-390A and they
all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is

that they
often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting

leaky and sometimes
it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A).

If you get a
chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy!

73

John Barnard

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite

feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you

encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The

receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out

man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it

also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may

consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a

sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can

be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference

points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow

weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways

liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC

NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any

questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing

to you, Gary




  #7   Report Post  
Old November 14th 04, 03:23 AM
george craig
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like how the HQ-180 lights up the shack at night ...........GC



"Michael Lawson" wrote in message
...
It also had sweet audio in general. I only got
to play with one for a couple of weeks, but man,
the thing I remember the most was the audio.

--Mike L.


"John Barnard" wrote in message
...
The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep

the circuits
aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will

have vernier
tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory

(I don't have
it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and

R-390A and they
all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is

that they
often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting

leaky and sometimes
it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A).

If you get a
chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy!

73

John Barnard

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite

feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you

encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The

receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out

man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it

also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may

consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a

sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can

be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference

points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow

weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways

liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC

NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any

questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing

to you, Gary






  #8   Report Post  
Old November 14th 04, 03:38 AM
Sniper
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:23:28 GMT, "george craig"
wrote:

I like how the HQ-180 lights up the shack at night ...........GC


And warms it too!!!! :-)

  #9   Report Post  
Old November 16th 04, 05:03 AM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing to you, Gary


I've used an HQ-180AC. It's a fun receiver that satisfies the urge to
twiddle knobs but I wouldn't trade a modern receiver like my R8B for the
'180'. A friend has the HQ-145x which is almost a '180'. He uses a
digital frequency display with it that takes all the guess work out of
the tuning.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #10   Report Post  
Old November 16th 04, 11:25 PM
BOEING377
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I recently bought an HQ 180 and LOVE it. It is soooo quiet , but very
sensitive. Stability is just OK after warmup, but I probably have been spoiled
by PLLs PTOs etc. With the 180 you need to touch up the tuning every 20 min or
so to keep an SSB signal sounding the same. Even when left on for days it
drifts a tiny bit. It is so much fun to use and it takes the chill off a small
room in the winter with those glowing filaments. I have "cheated" and bought a
digital readout kit, but I'll only use it when I cant find what I want using
analog tuning dials. I have always preferred the looks of Hallicrafters (SX 100
especially), but the HQ 180 blows away the Halli performance wise. You can
still find semi-cheap HQ 180s if you look hard. Mine was $150 in great shape
at a local ham swap. If you have room for one, they really make SWLing fun. I
have a DSP Ten Tec 320 but its not nearly as much fun to use as the HQ 180.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017