Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Lawson" wrote in message ... " Radio Flyer" wrote in message ... "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , " Radio Flyer" wrote: "CW" wrote in message ... Mine. your what? Radio! But that makes no sense, he was replying to "ET Phone Home" Where's the Gilligan's Island radio in all this, anyway?? --Mike L. I didn't know we were talking about one to begin with |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If you appreciate electronic construction and layout, my vote goes to any of the Hammarlund radios. They were built "to last forever".... Dials and controls .....s m o o t h.... If you pull the case, they're beautiful. No construction shortcuts. If you've ever marveled at the construiction of the older Tektronix Oscilloscopes, you know what I'm talking about. rj |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RJ wrote:
If you appreciate electronic construction and layout, my vote goes to any of the Hammarlund radios. They were built "to last forever".... Dials and controls .....s m o o t h.... If you pull the case, they're beautiful. No construction shortcuts. If you've ever marveled at the construiction of the older Tektronix Oscilloscopes, you know what I'm talking about. rj My Tektronics 7904 keeps the heaviest of doors open and the plugin modules work well on the windows. mike g Kidding aside, they're very nicely made pieces of equipment. I hope mine lasts forever. |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you appreciate electronic construction and layout,
my vote goes to any of the Hammarlund radios. They were built "to last forever".... Dials and controls .....s m o o t h.... If you pull the case, they're beautiful. No construction shortcuts. They are no doubt my favorites. My first Hammarlund was the 129X with the additional Q-Multiplier. Then the 140X and lastly the 180. They are built like tanks and I can hear anything on the 129X and the 180 that anyone else can hear on their rice burners. ;-) |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tommyknocker wrote in message ...
Question: if you want to operate a receiver from your PC, why not look at the receivers made specifically for PC operation? I would think that they would have better shielding. For the record: Passport recommends the Drake R8B, although in its 2005 edition the AOR is rated a close second. ... If you're in the US, it may be hard to get your hands on an AOR, as Passport says they're no longer sold in the US. You may be able to get a used one, or buy the Drake if it's essential that you have a brand spanking new right out of the box receiver. ... Dear Mr. Tommyknocker, The AOR AR7030 Plus works extremely well with computers. The shielding included in the radio is effective. AOR offers a program called DataMaster which I own but no longer use as Jan Arkesteijn's RxWings program, a far superior one and available free of charge, is essentially perfect. This receiver can be operated from the receiver itself, by its remote control, by a computer, or any combination (at the same time). The choice is the user's. This of course cannot be done with a PC (only) receiver. There are many excellent receivers for short wave listening. I feel that the AOR AR7030 Plus is the best and most versatile available at the present time. Read the PASSPORT review carefully. They actually state that for program listening the AR7030 is slightly superior to any other radio available; their reviewers do not like the operation of the radio. Personally, I think they are mistaken. I've owned my receiver since last March; I'm STILL waiting for the "glow of ownership" to pass! It is actually quite easy to buy an AR7030 from one of a number of shops in the UK. (It's really no different than buying via mail order from US dealers.) When I purchased mine it was still available from US dealers, but the English dealers, being more familiar with the receiver than their US counterparts, are much more responsive to the purchaser. I bought mine from THE SHORTWAVE SHOP in the UK, in conjunction with AOR UK. The Drake R8B, an admirable receiver, cannot be fully operated with a computer. Best, Joe |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:54:39 GMT, Yodar wrote:
Radio Man wrote: If money were no object what is the best general coverage receiver that one could purchase? for receive only DRAKE R-8 Yodar It is of course none other than the 1938 Zenith 15-U-269. I am the fortunate owner of one of these. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...7863 241&rd=1 |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it all depends on what you will be listening to. If you are
going for Radio Flyspeck that broadcasts for an hour a day on a 10 watt transmitter from Kiribati like one of the Japan Radio, Icom, Kenwood, etc., radios, lots of antenna. OTOH if you are looking for pleasant armchair listening to powerhouse broadcasters and don't need a radio that fits into a pocket, then go for an old Panasonic RF-5000b. Wonderfully smooth and mellow audio from a hefty radio in a wood case (brushed steel exterior). For a good portable at a decent price look at the Sony ICF7600GR. "Radio Man" wrote in message news:ewPmd.5860$h15.2506@trnddc07... If money were no object what is the best general coverage receiver that one could purchase? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RadCom G3WPO RX80 Receiver IC KB4412 and SL1621 data sought. | Homebrew | |||
RDS receiver and PC | Broadcasting | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Homebrew | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Homebrew |