RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   TV, ADD, Spellcasting, Etc. (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/46448-tv-add-spellcasting-etc.html)

Al Patrick November 22nd 04 03:24 PM

TV, ADD, Spellcasting, Etc.
 
Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE November 22nd 04 09:43 PM

Al Patrick wrote:
Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

SNIP
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.
Just thought some of you might like to know.


Just thought some of you might like to know what a vile, scary neo-Nazi,
Christian "Identity" nutcase Pete Peters is:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/amer...te-peters.html

Al Patrick November 22nd 04 11:05 PM

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:
Al Patrick wrote:

Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.


SNIP

http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.
Just thought some of you might like to know.



Just thought some of you might like to know what a vile, scary neo-Nazi,
Christian "Identity" nutcase Pete Peters is:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/amer...te-peters.html


And I thought some of you might want to know what some others think
about the ADL whom he referenced above.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/ADL/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League

For the following quote go to: http://www.zpub.com/notes/adl2.html

The ADL is "...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the
U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest
and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who
dares to criticize the Holy State ('Israel')." --Noam Chomsky, Professor
of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

http://www.sfbayview.com/012804/antisemitic012804.shtml

http://www.votenader.org/why_ralph/index.php?cid=119

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ghoffer06.html

http://www.eaif.org/Chron/chron83.htm

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti.../6/15319.shtml

And regardless of what you may think or claim about the "Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Zion" the ADL is VERY ANTI-CHRISTIAN. See:
http://www.rense.com/general54/adl.htm and yet they want the support of
all the Christians. "Let His blood be on our hands and on our
children!" "Crucify Him! Crucify Him!"

http://www.rense.com/general37/RRTO.HTM tells us "Libel Award Against
Anti-Defamation League Upheld 4-26-3 "

Check out http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news34.htm for a fellows
personal experiences with the ADL.

Boy! I almost forgot the William (Bill) Cooper archives. He used to
give LOTS of commentary on the ADL, their activities and the meaning of
B'nai B'rith. Best I can recall it basically means they are the sons
of AI. You Bible scholars know about the happenings at Ai don't you?
The children of Israel were defeated, temporarily, because of one man's
sin. How can they be "Israel" if they are the sons of a nation God
commanded Israel to destroy?

There is MUCH more on the ADL and its "fine" fellows - and tactics. But
this is enough to get you started. Don't want to "overload" you with
just one message. ;-)

Al

P.S. Let me put that snip back in in case any of you care to hear
Pastor Peter J. Peters for yourself tonight.

"He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know. "









tommyknocker November 23rd 04 02:53 AM

Al Patrick wrote:

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:
Al Patrick wrote:

Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.


SNIP

http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.
Just thought some of you might like to know.



Just thought some of you might like to know what a vile, scary neo-Nazi,
Christian "Identity" nutcase Pete Peters is:

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/amer...te-peters.html


And I thought some of you might want to know what some others think
about the ADL whom he referenced above.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/ADL/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League

For the following quote go to: http://www.zpub.com/notes/adl2.html

The ADL is "...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the
U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest
and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who
dares to criticize the Holy State ('Israel')." --Noam Chomsky, Professor
of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Al Patrick quotes Noam Chomsky! Who'da thunk it? The more extreme the
politics, the stranger the bedfellows.

http://www.sfbayview.com/012804/antisemitic012804.shtml

http://www.votenader.org/why_ralph/index.php?cid=119

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ghoffer06.html

http://www.eaif.org/Chron/chron83.htm

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti.../6/15319.shtml

And regardless of what you may think or claim about the "Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Zion" the ADL is VERY ANTI-CHRISTIAN. See:
http://www.rense.com/general54/adl.htm and yet they want the support of
all the Christians. "Let His blood be on our hands and on our
children!" "Crucify Him! Crucify Him!"


Have you ever considered that the Bible may NOT be an accurate
historical record?

http://www.rense.com/general37/RRTO.HTM tells us "Libel Award Against
Anti-Defamation League Upheld 4-26-3 "

Check out http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news34.htm for a fellows
personal experiences with the ADL.

Boy! I almost forgot the William (Bill) Cooper archives. He used to
give LOTS of commentary on the ADL, their activities and the meaning of
B'nai B'rith. Best I can recall it basically means they are the sons
of AI. You Bible scholars know about the happenings at Ai don't you?
The children of Israel were defeated, temporarily, because of one man's
sin. How can they be "Israel" if they are the sons of a nation God
commanded Israel to destroy?


Ai! :) Really, Al, the Jewish nation has subsumed any number of other
tribes over the millennia, especially in the ancient period. Being a Jew
isn't determined by genes, despite what you Nazis think.

Oh, and did the Jews kill Cooper? You know, override his brain with
their super technology and force his finger to pull the trigger?

There is MUCH more on the ADL and its "fine" fellows - and tactics. But
this is enough to get you started. Don't want to "overload" you with
just one message. ;-)

Al

P.S. Let me put that snip back in in case any of you care to hear
Pastor Peter J. Peters for yourself tonight.


I'll leave it in. If the Nazi nuts weren't ranting on SW, they'd be out
killing people. I'd prefer that they stick to SW, even if WWCR is kinda
hard to ignore. :)


"He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know. "











----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Al Patrick November 23rd 04 03:54 AM



tommyknocker wrote:
Al Patrick wrote:

s n i p
The ADL is "...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the
U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest
and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who
dares to criticize the Holy State ('Israel')." --Noam Chomsky, Professor
of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology



Al Patrick quotes Noam Chomsky! Who'da thunk it? The more extreme the
politics, the stranger the bedfellows.


I'm not too choosy. I'd even quote you if you ever said anything worthy
of being quoted (oh, I just did quote you, sorry.)

The above quote is just typical of MANY people's opinions on the ADL and
they have much proof to back it up. . . . One thing the ADL seems to be
really short on most of the time. They just tell their lies and, sad to
say, all too often law enforcement seems to accept it as the truth. One
high school principal received a message from the ADL with a preacher's
picture on it and telling how "dangerous" that preacher was. I'm sure
he must frighten them nearly to death because one thing they can't stand
is the truth. Like cock roaches they run from the light and scurry for
another rock to crawl under -- all the while telling others how
"dangerous" light is! :-) I'm sure it must have been sent to far more
than the one principal. Anyway, that one surely didn't buy the lies!

Al

BDK November 23rd 04 04:32 AM

In article ,
says...
Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al


And what was it that caused Pete's insanity??

BDK

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE November 23rd 04 06:53 AM

Al Patrick wrote:
The above quote is just typical of MANY people's opinions on the ADL and
they have much proof to back it up. . . . One thing the ADL seems to be
really short on most of the time. They just tell their lies and, sad to
say, all too often law enforcement seems to accept it as the truth.


Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
drifting off your own topic.

Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
believe?

--His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?

--Homosexuals should be executed?

--Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?


Al Patrick November 23rd 04 01:07 PM

Working on a reply right now, but tune your radio to 9.985 MHz to see
what Joyce Reily is about to tell us of Israel buying another key piece
of real estate in Washington! It's 08:00 EST / 13:00 UTC now.

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:
Al Patrick wrote:

The above quote is just typical of MANY people's opinions on the ADL and
they have much proof to back it up. . . . One thing the ADL seems to be
really short on most of the time. They just tell their lies and, sad to
say, all too often law enforcement seems to accept it as the truth.



Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
drifting off your own topic.

Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
believe?

--His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?

--Homosexuals should be executed?

--Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?


Al Patrick November 23rd 04 02:19 PM



Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:

Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
drifting off your own topic.

Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
believe?

--His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?

--Homosexuals should be executed?

--Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?


I'm going to letter your three comments as A) B) & C).

A) You say, " --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn
of Satan?"

Let's see if he has any basis for it. Shall we start with what Jesus
Christ Himself and other Bible characters said?

In Matthew 15 the scribes and Pharisees (v. 1) came to Jesus and ... He
answered (v.3) Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your
tradition? Go ahead and read the chapter. He tells of their hypocracies
and calls them hypocrites. V.22 a Canaanite woman comes to Him and
tells her it is not right to take the Children's bread and give it to
the DOGS. (v26)

In Matthew 16 He calls the Pharisees and dSadducees hypocrites and a
wicked and adulterous generation and verse 6 tells us, "Take heed and
beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."

There are MANY other places where Christ calls the Pharisees and
Sadducees things like snakes, white washed tombs, etc. Then, in John 8
He tells them they are of THEIR FATHER THE DEVIL.

38 ¶ I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that
which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith
unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth,
which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not
born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for
I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he
sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye
will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

46 ¶ Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do
ye not believe me?

47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not,
because ye are not of God.

I suppose that is far enough on this one topic.

But there is MUCH more Biblical and secular evidence.

Check out YOU GENTILES by a Jewish author, Maurice Samuel. The cover,
front, back and even the spine is a picture of one HUGE cattle pen with
all kinds of chutes and cross fences. I'm sure this represents the fact
that Jews see non-Jews as goyim - cattle. There are MANY significant
quotes available from this piece of enlightenment. We'll just mention a
few. Chap. 9 is entitled "We, the Destroyers". His opening sentence,
"If anything, you must learn (and are learning)to dislike and fear the
modern and 'assimilated' Jew more than you did the old Jew, for he is
more dangerous to you." That, along with the chapter title, reminds me
of something George Washington is supposed to have said.

According to Maxims of George Washington, by A. A. Appleton & Co, old
George said, "They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the
enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties
and the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that
each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and
the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."

B) & C) will have to wait, but get a good Bible and read Leviticus 18:22
and follow any references thereto for B.

C) I never heard of and wonder who made it up. The ADL? ;-)

m II November 23rd 04 04:49 PM

Al Patrick wrote:

Working on a reply right now, but tune your radio to 9.985 MHz to see
what Joyce Reily is about to tell us of Israel buying another key piece
of real estate in Washington! It's 08:00 EST / 13:00 UTC now.




That's rich. Israel using American welfare billions to buy land in the
donor country. I love it. I wonder how much of the billions in 'aid'
to the zionists gets rechanneled to crooked politicians via the
NeoCon network? A little kickback assures the money keeps flowing.

A wonderful system..well, perhaps not for the US taxpayer, but they
don't have any say over foreign policy anyway.



mike





Stephen M.H. Lawrence November 23rd 04 05:35 PM


"Leigh Marrin/KM6JE" wrote:

| Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
| drifting off your own topic.
|
| Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
| believe?
|
| --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?
|
| --Homosexuals should be executed?
|
| --Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?

Aww, don't mind Al; he's RRS's resident Jew - hater®.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04



george craig November 23rd 04 05:49 PM

Interesting article by a jew, Dr. Henery Makow
www.savethemales.ca/000482.html
..............GC



"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
link.net...

"Leigh Marrin/KM6JE" wrote:

| Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
| drifting off your own topic.
|
| Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
| believe?
|
| --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?
|
| --Homosexuals should be executed?
|
| --Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?

Aww, don't mind Al; he's RRS's resident Jew - hater®.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04





Al Patrick November 23rd 04 05:50 PM

Ever heard the saying, "The bit dog barks"? "The truth hurts"? The
truth is the truth, even when it is about Jews.

Stephen M.H. Lawrence wrote:
"Leigh Marrin/KM6JE" wrote:

| Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
| drifting off your own topic.
|
| Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
| believe?
|
| --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?
|
| --Homosexuals should be executed?
|
| --Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?

Aww, don't mind Al; he's RRS's resident Jew - hater®.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04



uncle arnie November 23rd 04 09:39 PM

Bunk. First of all the diagnosis is ADHD (Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder), not ADD (not since DSM-IV). Second, there is no link b/n the
development of ADHD and TV. It is usually noticed in toddlerhood, before TV
is a factor. It is neurological condition. Runs in families. In some
communities, it is over-diagnosed and inappropriate prescriptions given.
Treated in the UK with minimal medication. Treated in North America as
medicine as the first thing. Relates to drug company advertising and
schools not wanting to spend the $ on behavioral treatments and off loading
this onto drugs and parents.

I think your Pastor Peters is not qualified to diagnose, discuss etiology or
provide a review of research.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:24 am, Al Patrick posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM

Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al



Al Patrick November 23rd 04 11:45 PM

"He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+."

You don't read too well. Bro. Stair probably does a better job. ;-)

==========

uncle arnie wrote:
Bunk. First of all the diagnosis is ADHD (Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder), not ADD (not since DSM-IV). Second, there is no link b/n the
development of ADHD and TV. It is usually noticed in toddlerhood, before TV
is a factor. It is neurological condition. Runs in families. In some
communities, it is over-diagnosed and inappropriate prescriptions given.
Treated in the UK with minimal medication. Treated in North America as
medicine as the first thing. Relates to drug company advertising and
schools not wanting to spend the $ on behavioral treatments and off loading
this onto drugs and parents.

I think your Pastor Peters is not qualified to diagnose, discuss etiology or
provide a review of research.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:24 am, Al Patrick posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM


Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al




tommyknocker November 24th 04 02:51 AM

Stephen M.H. Lawrence wrote:


"Leigh Marrin/KM6JE" wrote:

| Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
| drifting off your own topic.
|
| Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
| believe?
|
| --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?
|
| --Homosexuals should be executed?
|
| --Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?

Aww, don't mind Al; he's RRS's resident Jew - hater®.


Al also believes the Bible is literally true and correct. Unfortunately
this is not an isolated view among Americans. I personally have a hard
time taking seriously anybody who believes in the literal truth of say
the account of Creation in Genesis, or the Great Flood (and Noah's Ark).
Jonah wasn't literally swallowed by a whale, Moses didn't literally hit
the ground with his staff and cause water to appear, the Red Sea didn't
literally open up and allow the Israelites to walk across on dry land
then cave in on Pharaoh's troops (despite what the movie shows). You'd
think all of this would be obvious in an age of science, and that the
Bible is full of metaphors and parables, but apparently not. (Tackling
just one of those: the original Hebrew said Jonah was swallowed by a big
fish, which was their equivalent of an American saying somebody is
between a rock and a hard place; it's a figure of speech, we don't mean
it literally. In Jonah's case, he was in a tough position because he was
made to go and preach moral reform to a wicked city, something he didn't
want to do.)




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE November 24th 04 04:16 AM

Al Patrick wrote:
Ever heard the saying, "The bit dog barks"? "The truth hurts"? The
truth is the truth, even when it is about Jews.


Al, I read your "proof", and I don't buy it. The bible is so full of
odd & archaic phrases, contradictions, history & fables that just about
ANYTHING can be extracted from it. Whether one is a Ghandi-ish
turn-the-other-cheek pacifist or a Mad Bomber blowing up abortion clinics,
each extreme can find some passage in the bible to justify their behavior.

So: evidently you DO BELIEVE that jews are the "spawn of satan", like
your hero, Pete Peters. I'm not surprised: do you STILL believe your
posting of several years ago; that all the Jews who worked in the World
Trade Center were warned not to work on 9/11/01?

The truth hurts, Al: IMO, you are a gullible naive who is quite willing
to believe almost any kooky anti-semitic theory.


m II November 24th 04 05:40 AM

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:

Whether one is a Ghandi-ish
turn-the-other-cheek pacifist or a Mad Bomber blowing up abortion clinics,
each extreme can find some passage in the bible to justify their behavior.


You misunderestimate the venerable Mister Gandhi

"Where the choice is between only violence and cowardice, I would
advise violence."

~ Mohatma Gandhi






mike

k35454 November 24th 04 06:01 AM


"tommyknocker" wrote in message
...
Stephen M.H. Lawrence wrote:


"Leigh Marrin/KM6JE" wrote:

| Al, you started this "thread" on Pete Peters, and now you're quickly
| drifting off your own topic.
|
| Speaking of truth, I wonder how many of Pastor Pete's "truths" do you
| believe?
|
| --His "Christian" Identity belief that Jews are the spawn of Satan?
|
| --Homosexuals should be executed?
|
| --Peters' support of domestic terrorist groups like "The Order"?

Aww, don't mind Al; he's RRS's resident Jew - hater®.


Al also believes the Bible is literally true and correct. Unfortunately
this is not an isolated view among Americans. I personally have a hard
time taking seriously anybody who believes in the literal truth of say
the account of Creation in Genesis, or the Great Flood (and Noah's Ark).
Jonah wasn't literally swallowed by a whale, Moses didn't literally hit
the ground with his staff and cause water to appear, the Red Sea didn't
literally open up and allow the Israelites to walk across on dry land
then cave in on Pharaoh's troops (despite what the movie shows). You'd
think all of this would be obvious in an age of science, and that the
Bible is full of metaphors and parables, but apparently not. (Tackling
just one of those: the original Hebrew said Jonah was swallowed by a big
fish, which was their equivalent of an American saying somebody is
between a rock and a hard place; it's a figure of speech, we don't mean
it literally. In Jonah's case, he was in a tough position because he was
made to go and preach moral reform to a wicked city, something he didn't
want to do.)

"... Jonah was swallowed by a big fish..." ... A whale is not a fish.
k35454.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---



Al Patrick November 24th 04 09:20 AM

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Leigh Marrin/KM6JE wrote:

So: evidently you DO BELIEVE that jews are the "spawn of satan", like
your hero, Pete Peters. I'm not surprised: do you STILL believe your
posting of several years ago; that all the Jews who worked in the World
Trade Center were warned not to work on 9/11/01?


Stephen M.H. Lawrence November 24th 04 03:56 PM


"Al Patrick" wrote:
| John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
| ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
| truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
| speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Al,

I just wanted to pass on a message to you:

The laundry called, and your brown shirts are ready.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04



Al Patrick November 24th 04 04:39 PM

Steve,

I didn't realize you were a laundry assistant! ;-)

Here are a few other quotes to ponder - since you like them so well.

Pr 11:21 Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished:
but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered.

Pr 13:5 A righteous man hateth lying: but a wicked man is loathsome,
and cometh to shame.

Pr 13:9 The light of the righteous rejoiceth: but the lamp of the
wicked shall be put out.

Pr 15:28 The heart of the righteous studieth to answer: but the mouth
of the wicked poureth out evil things.

Pr 15:29 The LORD is far from the wicked: but he heareth the prayer of
the righteous.

Pr 18:5 It is not good to accept the person of the wicked, to overthrow
the righteous in judgment.

Pr 21:12 The righteous man wisely considereth the house of the wicked:
but God overthroweth the wicked for their wickedness.

Pr 24:15 Lay not wait, O wicked man, against the dwelling of the
righteous; spoil not his resting place:

Pr 24:24 He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall
the people curse, nations shall abhor him:

Pr 28:1 The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are
bold as a lion.

Pr 28:12 When righteous men do rejoice, there is great glory: but when
the wicked rise, a man is hidden.

Pr 28:28 When the wicked rise, men hide themselves: but when they
perish, the righteous increase.

Pr 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but
when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

Pr 29:7 The righteous considereth the cause of the poor: but the wicked
regardeth not to know it.

Pr 29:16 When the wicked are multiplied, transgression increaseth: but
the righteous shall see their fall.

Ec 3:17 I said in mine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the
wicked: for there is a time there for every purpose and for every work.

Isa 5:23 Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the
righteousness of the righteous from him!


Stephen M.H. Lawrence wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote:
| John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
| ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
| truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
| speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Al,

I just wanted to pass on a message to you:

The laundry called, and your brown shirts are ready.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota


Leigh Marrin/KM6JE November 24th 04 07:59 PM

Al Patrick wrote:
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.


Matthew 7:1 Judge not, so ye may not be judged.


uncle arnie November 24th 04 10:19 PM

ONe study does not prove anything. Maybe the teacher did this with his/her
own kids. What peer reviewed journal is the study published in. I hope
you don't believe everything a shyster religous nut tells you. This is
stil b.s.

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:45 pm, Al Patrick posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM

"He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+."

You don't read too well. Bro. Stair probably does a better job. ;-)

==========

uncle arnie wrote:
Bunk. First of all the diagnosis is ADHD (Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder), not ADD (not since DSM-IV). Second, there is no link b/n the
development of ADHD and TV. It is usually noticed in toddlerhood, before
TV
is a factor. It is neurological condition. Runs in families. In some
communities, it is over-diagnosed and inappropriate prescriptions given.
Treated in the UK with minimal medication. Treated in North America as
medicine as the first thing. Relates to drug company advertising and
schools not wanting to spend the $ on behavioral treatments and off
loading this onto drugs and parents.

I think your Pastor Peters is not qualified to diagnose, discuss etiology
or provide a review of research.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:24 am, Al Patrick posted
to rec.radio.shortwave: %MM


Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al





Al Patrick November 24th 04 10:48 PM

The point of the posting was for YOU to be able to hear it ALL, IN
CONTEXT, FOR YOURSELF if you were interested. Apparently you were not so
I don't feel obligated to try to tell you the entire context. Anyone
can sit back and belly ache about what *they think* someone else is.
It's a whole different matter to get the data and PROVE them to be
wrong. To you it probably is B.S. I'm sure all those who hammered on
the door of the ark, if they did, after the gully washer rain came had
changed their mind. However, for some, it is too late. YOU have to
make up YOUR own mind, but don't pretend everyone else is wrong because
you can't or won't see it! :-)

uncle arnie wrote:
ONe study does not prove anything. Maybe the teacher did this with his/her
own kids. What peer reviewed journal is the study published in. I hope
you don't believe everything a shyster religous nut tells you. This is
stil b.s.

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:45 pm, Al Patrick posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM


"He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+."

You don't read too well. Bro. Stair probably does a better job. ;-)

==========

uncle arnie wrote:

Bunk. First of all the diagnosis is ADHD (Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder), not ADD (not since DSM-IV). Second, there is no link b/n the
development of ADHD and TV. It is usually noticed in toddlerhood, before
TV
is a factor. It is neurological condition. Runs in families. In some
communities, it is over-diagnosed and inappropriate prescriptions given.
Treated in the UK with minimal medication. Treated in North America as
medicine as the first thing. Relates to drug company advertising and
schools not wanting to spend the $ on behavioral treatments and off
loading this onto drugs and parents.

I think your Pastor Peters is not qualified to diagnose, discuss etiology
or provide a review of research.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:24 am, Al Patrick posted
to rec.radio.shortwave: %MM



Pastor Peter J. Peters was on WWCR 9.985 at 9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC and had
been catching up on his mail as he was discussing lots of little topics
which got mailed to him.

He sites a study and quotes a teacher concerning TV between the ages of
2 & 3 causing ADD at age 7+.

Lots of other topics of interest.

Oh, this same program (Dated 11/11/04, I believe) will be repeated on
12.160 MHz at 12:00 EST / 17:00 UTC and again at 11:00 pm (23:00) EST /
04:00 UTC.

He'll also be on the hour before this last mention, but that will be
different - sometimes LIVE. Also that one gets repeated at 04:00 EST /
09:00 UTC.

He's also on satellite 24/7 on Telstar 5. Look for SFAW, Scriptures For
America, etc. Don't know the exact name of the channel.

All this can be heard on the internet at
http://www.scripturesforamerica.org - I think.

Just thought some of you might like to know.

Al




Profit Stair November 25th 04 10:34 AM

From the book of almighty subgenious Bob:
Bob 6:66 - Confucious say defecate in your pants.

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Steve,

I didn't realize you were a laundry assistant! ;-)

Here are a few other quotes to ponder - since you like them so well.

Pr 11:21 Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished:
but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered.

Pr 13:5 A righteous man hateth lying: but a wicked man is loathsome, and
cometh to shame.

Pr 13:9 The light of the righteous rejoiceth: but the lamp of the wicked
shall be put out.

Pr 15:28 The heart of the righteous studieth to answer: but the mouth of
the wicked poureth out evil things.

Pr 15:29 The LORD is far from the wicked: but he heareth the prayer of
the righteous.

Pr 18:5 It is not good to accept the person of the wicked, to overthrow
the righteous in judgment.

Pr 21:12 The righteous man wisely considereth the house of the wicked:
but God overthroweth the wicked for their wickedness.

Pr 24:15 Lay not wait, O wicked man, against the dwelling of the
righteous; spoil not his resting place:

Pr 24:24 He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the
people curse, nations shall abhor him:

Pr 28:1 The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold
as a lion.

Pr 28:12 When righteous men do rejoice, there is great glory: but when
the wicked rise, a man is hidden.

Pr 28:28 When the wicked rise, men hide themselves: but when they perish,
the righteous increase.

Pr 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when
the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

Pr 29:7 The righteous considereth the cause of the poor: but the wicked
regardeth not to know it.

Pr 29:16 When the wicked are multiplied, transgression increaseth: but
the righteous shall see their fall.

Ec 3:17 I said in mine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the
wicked: for there is a time there for every purpose and for every work.

Isa 5:23 Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the
righteousness of the righteous from him!


Stephen M.H. Lawrence wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote:
| John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your
father
| ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
| truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
| speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Al,

I just wanted to pass on a message to you:

The laundry called, and your brown shirts are ready.

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, Minnesota




Al Patrick November 28th 04 10:21 PM

Honus wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...


b i g s n i p

NO such things
as nuclear energy such that the skin can melt off a man while he yet
stands, along with his eyes and tongue melting out of his head!



More hyperbole. You're basically describing a massive amount of heat. Why
not? They tried to say that the entire planet was buried under a massive
amount of water. I'm surprised they didn't bring up anything about massive
amounts of ice, too. (Besides hail stones.) Oh, wait. Why would they? They
encounter all of those other phenomena in the Middle East...but ice ages,
no. Hmmm. Kind of telling, don't you think?


Check out:

Zec 14:12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite
all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall
consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall
consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in
their mouth.

Honus November 29th 04 02:46 AM


"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Honus wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...


b i g s n i p

NO such things
as nuclear energy such that the skin can melt off a man while he yet
stands, along with his eyes and tongue melting out of his head!



More hyperbole. You're basically describing a massive amount of heat.

Why
not? They tried to say that the entire planet was buried under a massive
amount of water. I'm surprised they didn't bring up anything about

massive
amounts of ice, too. (Besides hail stones.) Oh, wait. Why would they?

They
encounter all of those other phenomena in the Middle East...but ice

ages,
no. Hmmm. Kind of telling, don't you think?


Check out:

Zec 14:12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite
all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall
consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall
consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in
their mouth.


Ah, I see. I made a mistake...this wasn't a one time instantaneous event, it
was a -plague-. Sounds like a disease of some sort to me. As a matter of
fact, I've got a translation here that flat out calls it a disease.You seem
to think that it's some sort of nuclear cataclysm. When was the last time
Jehovah nuked anybody, because that's what the verse says according to your
view. "...the Lord will smite...." Oh, wait...I forgot. It's not what the
verse says that matters, it's what you want it to say.

I notice that it says the "plague" will nail ALL of the people that have
fought Israel. A novel twist on the neutron bomb, perhaps? Only kills Jew
haters, and leaves the rest standing? If that's the case, then I'd say that
you're pretty much screwed, anti-Semite that you are. ;)

Here's one for -you- to check out:

Judges 1:19 King James Version

"And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the
mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because
they had chariots of iron."

Seems to me a little nuke ought to have come in handy right about then.
Maybe Einstein and Oppenheimer made it through the Pearly Gates, and God's
been able to improve his arsenal.

Considering the fact that he was originally a tribal war god, Jehovah ain't
much in the military department. They must have screwed up, and offered up a
sacrificial lamb with a spot on its ass or something. You know how
particular Yahweh is about that sort of thing.

And my wife thinks -I'm- a picky eater.

By the way: I notice that you snipped out all of those other points I made,
you know, about earthquakes and such, and stuck with the most ambiguous one.
But even that one flies against what you claim it means.

Why are you going out of your way to help me out here?

And by the way; diseases aren't caused by little demons in your body. Just
thought you might like to know that.





m II November 30th 04 03:40 AM

Honus wrote:

They must have screwed up, and offered up a
sacrificial lamb with a spot on its ass or something. You know how
particular Yahweh is about that sort of thing.



He's not alone. That very same thing made vegetarians out of whole
generations. Even the lions wouldn't touch the lambs with the spots on
their asses. They just lay there with them. It's in the Book!




mike

Daryl Krupa December 1st 04 12:07 AM

"Honus" wrote in message news:PHSqd.12858$lv6.2417@trnddc03...
"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
om...


snip
If you wish, I can supply links to the writeups on Ballard's finds
in professional journals.


I can find 'em.


I'm not going to let your demurral stop me, because there are really
only 2 on the 'net:

Ballard, R. D. Fred Hiebert, Dwight Coleman, Cheryl Ward,
Jennifer Smith, Kathryn Willis, Brendan Foley, Katherine Croff,
Candace Major, Francesco Torre
2001
Deepwater Archaeology of the Black Sea of the Black Sea:
The 2000 Season at Sinop, Turkey
American Journal of Archeology, v. 105, no. 4, pp. 607-623

http://www.ajaonline.org/archive/105...54.pdf#ballard

There you will see, on p. 615, the supposed habitation site:
Table 1.
Radiocarbon Analysis of Samples Collected from the Surface of Site 82

The dates range from 250 to 120 BP, i.e.
no earlier than the 17th Century A.D..

Also, on the previous page,
"Two samples were taken of the top 5-7 cm of deposit from within Site
82 ...
Both samples contained ... no ceramics, stone debitage, or diagnostic
artifacts."

Whatever it may be, the "habitation site" is not proof of a BSFlood.
It could easily be 12,000 years old, which is about when the level
of the Black Sea dropped to its lowest point.

Sad to say, Ballard didn't find Noah's house.

There's just one mo

Further evidence of abrupt Holocene drowning of the Black Sea shelf.
Ballard, R.D, Coleman, D.F., Rosenberg, G. D.
2000
Marine Geology. 170; 3-4, Pages 253-261

There used to be more, but his archaeolologist Hiebert's pages on
the subject are gone, even from his own professional site, which
otherwise seems not to have been updated for more than a year:

http://www.museum.upenn.edu/Sinop/SinopIntro.htm

Ballard's latest report on his 2000 season in the Black Sea
mentions the BSFlood, but notes that it is controversial, and says
nothing at all about Noah's address, Site 82.

Ward, Cheryl and Robert D. Ballard
2004
Deep-water Archaeological Survey in the Black Sea: 2000 Season
The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology
Volume 33 Issue 1 Page 2 - April 2004
doi:10.1111/j.1095-9270.2004.00002.x

"Recent archaeological survey by sidescan sonar and remotely operated
vehicles (ROVs) resulted in the discovery of one of the best-preserved
seagoing ships from antiquity in the anoxic waters of the Black Sea.
Three shipwrecks from the 4th to 6th centuries AD, with cargoes of
shipping jars from Sinop, Turkey, were found at depths of about 100 m;
the fourth sits upright on the sea-bed, buried to deck level in
sediment. A description of each site and identification of visible
site components is followed by a discussion of directions and possible
implications of future research."

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/lin....00002.x/full/

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/ope...ssue=1&spage=2

And what is likely to be Ryan's last gasp (I hear that he has not
done well in conference tournaments lately):

William B.F. Ryan, Candace O. Major, Gilles Lericolais, and *Steven L.
Goldstein
CATASTROPHIC FLOODING OF THE BLACK SEA
2003
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Vol. 31: 525-554 (Volume publication date May 2003)

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/...100901.141249?

Abstract:
http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/....100901.141249

Sorry to splash water in the frying pan.


Why? It's some theists that can't accept change based on better information.
I don't have that problem. ;)


Hmmm ... what's that subtle taste? I remember it from long ago,
but I so rarely encounter it nowadays ... HAH! That's It! It's
Rationality!

Daryl Krupa

Honus December 1st 04 05:44 AM


"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
m...
"Honus" wrote in message

news:PHSqd.12858$lv6.2417@trnddc03...
"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
om...


snip
If you wish, I can supply links to the writeups on Ballard's finds
in professional journals.


I can find 'em.


I'm not going to let your demurral stop me, because there are really
only 2 on the 'net:

Ballard, R. D. Fred Hiebert, Dwight Coleman, Cheryl Ward,
Jennifer Smith, Kathryn Willis, Brendan Foley, Katherine Croff,
Candace Major, Francesco Torre
2001
Deepwater Archaeology of the Black Sea of the Black Sea:
The 2000 Season at Sinop, Turkey
American Journal of Archeology, v. 105, no. 4, pp. 607-623

http://www.ajaonline.org/archive/105...54.pdf#ballard

There you will see, on p. 615, the supposed habitation site:
Table 1.
Radiocarbon Analysis of Samples Collected from the Surface of Site 82

The dates range from 250 to 120 BP, i.e.
no earlier than the 17th Century A.D..


Right, but they also state that all of those things were surface items
recently deposited on the site. They weren't claiming that they were left
there by the inhabitants. Did you catch the bit about the "concentrations of
zinc and copper"? That one really caught me off guard! I'm usre that they
didn't mean for it to be as funny as I found it. g

Also, on the previous page,
"Two samples were taken of the top 5-7 cm of deposit from within Site
82 ...
Both samples contained ... no ceramics, stone debitage, or diagnostic
artifacts."


I'm missing your point. They didn't find anything diagnostic...that's all.
Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, as they say. And they do note
that more sampling and collection of baseline data is needed. Seems to be
the proper stance to me.

Whatever it may be, the "habitation site" is not proof of a BSFlood.
It could easily be 12,000 years old, which is about when the level
of the Black Sea dropped to its lowest point.


That's a possibility. It sounds like the jury is still out; I can wait for
the verdict, albeit a bit impatiently.

By the way, thanks again for that link. It was a neat one. I loved those
pictures! I didn't expect them, and was quite pleasantly surprised to find
them. But am I the only guy around that loathes pdf's?

Sad to say, Ballard didn't find Noah's house.

There's just one mo

Further evidence of abrupt Holocene drowning of the Black Sea shelf.
Ballard, R.D, Coleman, D.F., Rosenberg, G. D.
2000
Marine Geology. 170; 3-4, Pages 253-261

There used to be more, but his archaeolologist Hiebert's pages on
the subject are gone, even from his own professional site, which
otherwise seems not to have been updated for more than a year:

http://www.museum.upenn.edu/Sinop/SinopIntro.htm

Ballard's latest report on his 2000 season in the Black Sea
mentions the BSFlood, but notes that it is controversial, and says
nothing at all about Noah's address, Site 82.


I keep getting "cannot find server" error messages when I try to navigate
from that page. I'll continue with my attempts, though. That looks like
interesting reading.


http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/lin....00002.x/full/


http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/ope...ssue=1&spage=2



http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/...100901.141249?

Abstract:

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/....100901.141249

Nuts. Those are pay sites. :( I'm not about to give them $15 regardless of
how interested I am, so I'll just have to take your word for it. g

Hmmm ... what's that subtle taste? I remember it from long ago,
but I so rarely encounter it nowadays ... HAH! That's It! It's
Rationality!


It's a rare beast, more's the pity. Anyway, that's the flood that the
original poster was referring to. Whether it happened or not is a different
matter. My mind's made up on the Noachin one, though. ;)



Daryl Krupa December 4th 04 07:33 AM

"Honus" wrote in message news:pTcrd.4219$wr6.1893@trnddc04...
"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
m...
"Honus" wrote in message

news:PHSqd.12858$lv6.2417@trnddc03...
"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
om...


snip
If you wish, I can supply links to the writeups on Ballard's finds
in professional journals.

I can find 'em.


I'm not going to let your demurral stop me, because there are really
only 2 on the 'net:

Ballard, R. D. Fred Hiebert, Dwight Coleman, Cheryl Ward,
Jennifer Smith, Kathryn Willis, Brendan Foley, Katherine Croff,
Candace Major, Francesco Torre
2001
Deepwater Archaeology of the Black Sea of the Black Sea:
The 2000 Season at Sinop, Turkey
American Journal of Archeology, v. 105, no. 4, pp. 607-623

http://www.ajaonline.org/archive/105...54.pdf#ballard

There you will see, on p. 615, the supposed habitation site:
Table 1.
Radiocarbon Analysis of Samples Collected from the Surface of Site 82

The dates range from 250 to 120 BP, i.e.
no earlier than the 17th Century A.D..


Right, but they also state that all of those things were surface items
recently deposited on the site. They weren't claiming that they were left
there by the inhabitants.


Well, if you look at the National Geographic journal of the 2000
expedition, they were sure hoping that they we

"We were able to see that this structure more or less is in
the shape of what we would think is an ancient house. It had
ceramics. It had these ground stone implements. It had the
clear remains of walls made out of mud with sticks and beams
as their major construction."

Dispatch 10, 2000 (Sept, 9)

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/bl.../ax/frame.html


From a NatGeog press release:

"Today Ballard, famous for finding Titanic, confirmed that his
research team, sponsored in part by the National Geographic Society,
has identified a wooden structure on a gently sloping shelf near the
convergence of two submerged ancient river beds.

"This is an incredible find," Ballard said in a telephone call to the
National Geographic Society from the expedition ship Northern Horizon.
"It consists of [the remains of] a single building with a hewn beam
and wooden branches that formed the walls and roof of a structure—most
likely a house. We have also found and photographed stone tools,
possibly a chisel or an axe, and ceramic storage vessels, all
untouched since the flooding of the Black Sea."

The find represents "the first concrete evidence for the occupation of
the Black Sea coast prior to its flooding," says expedition
archaeologist Fredrik Hiebert, of the University of Pennsylvania
Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. "This is a major discovery
that will rewrite the history of civilizations in this key area
between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East."

The wooden structure is the only building sighted so far during the
expedition. As the search continues, the team hopes that additional
finds will suggest a settlement pattern along the ancient coastline.
Using sonar profiles, Ballard's team has identified more than 50
potential search areas similar to the site of the structure."

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...0blacksea.html


Did you catch the bit about the "concentrations of
zinc and copper"? That one really caught me off guard! I'm usre that they
didn't mean for it to be as funny as I found it. g


No, I didn't; which page is it on, please?

Also, on the previous page,
"Two samples were taken of the top 5-7 cm of deposit from within Site
82 ...
Both samples contained ... no ceramics, stone debitage, or diagnostic
artifacts."


I'm missing your point. They didn't find anything diagnostic...that's all.
Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, as they say. And they do note
that more sampling and collection of baseline data is needed. Seems to be
the proper stance to me.


Yes, except that it negates the earlier claim by Hiebert:
"It had ceramics. It had these ground stone implements.
It had the clear remains of walls made out of mud with sticks and
beams as their major construction."
It's an admission that the earlier claim was inflated.

Whatever it may be, the "habitation site" is not proof of a BSFlood.
It could easily be 12,000 years old, which is about when the level
of the Black Sea dropped to its lowest point.


That's a possibility. It sounds like the jury is still out;
I can wait for the verdict, albeit a bit impatiently.


Look again at Ballard's and Hiebert's words, and their current
opinions on the site:

"Black Sea Trip Yields No Flood Conclusions
....
Hiebert had hoped wood pieces from the suspected homestead would prove
it was built before the flood, which would help date the event
conclusively.
But some of the retrieved pieces dated to after the flood, meaning no
one
can say exactly when the settlement had been built.

Also, scientists found nothing that could have established whether the
site was a human settlement.

"We didn't find a farmer or his tools," Ballard said."

http://www.puresupply.com/newap/D8458SGG3.html

The prosecution of the case has been dropped by the claimants,
due to lack of evidence. That's the only verdict you'll ever see.

By the way, thanks again for that link. It was a neat one. I loved those
pictures! I didn't expect them, and was quite pleasantly surprised to find
them. But am I the only guy around that loathes pdf's?


You take what you can get.

Sad to say, Ballard didn't find Noah's house.

There's just one mo

Further evidence of abrupt Holocene drowning of the Black Sea shelf.
Ballard, R.D, Coleman, D.F., Rosenberg, G. D.
2000
Marine Geology. 170; 3-4, Pages 253-261

There used to be more, but his archaeolologist Hiebert's pages on
the subject are gone, even from his own professional site, which
otherwise seems not to have been updated for more than a year:

http://www.museum.upenn.edu/Sinop/SinopIntro.htm

Ballard's latest report on his 2000 season in the Black Sea
mentions the BSFlood, but notes that it is controversial, and says
nothing at all about Noah's address, Site 82.


I keep getting "cannot find server" error messages when I try to navigate
from that page. I'll continue with my attempts, though. That looks like
interesting reading.


Actually, it's not that interesting. It doesn't have any more on
"Noah's House" than the NatGeog site does.

Abstract:


http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/....100901.141249

Nuts. Those are pay sites. :( I'm not about to give them $15 regardless of
how interested I am, so I'll just have to take your word for it. g


See if you can get guest access at a university library, one that
has the necessary subscriptions. That's what I do.
But you should have been able to see the abstract, at least:

"Abstract
Decades of seabed mapping, reflection profiling, and seabed sampling
reveal that throughout the past two million years the Black Sea was
predominantly a freshwater lake interrupted only briefly by sal****er
invasions coincident with global sea level highstand.
When the exterior ocean lay below the relatively shallow sill of the
Bosporus outlet, the Black Sea operated in two modes.
As in the neighboring Caspian Sea, a cold climate mode corresponded
with an expanded lake and a warm climate mode with a shrunken lake.
Thus, during much of the cold glacial Quaternary, the expanded Black
Sea's lake spilled into to the Marmara Sea and from there to the
Mediterranean.
However, in the warm climate mode, after receiving a vast volume of
ice sheet mel****er, the shoreline of the shrinking lake contracted
to the outer shelf and on a few occasions even beyond the shelf edge.
If the confluence of a falling interior lake and a rising global ocean
persisted to the moment when the rising ocean penetrated across the
dividing sill, it would set the stage for catastrophic flooding.
Although recently challenged, the flood hypothesis for the connecting
event best fits the full set of observations."

From the body of the article:

"Criticisms of Catastrophic Flooding

The hypothesis of a rapid terminal flooding of the Black Sea
has been criticized (Aksu et al. 2002a, b, Görür et al. 2001).
The initial objection (Görür et al. 2001) noted the presence of
8.1-ky BP peat and 7.2-ky BP wood associated with brackish fauna
(Dreissena polymorpha and Monodacna caspia) in cores from
the Sakarya River and adjacent shelf.
Deposits with these components at a depth of 22 m
conflicted with a lake downed at 7.14 ky BP as originally proposed.
However, a recognition
from the strontium isotopes
that the salinization was initiated earlier at 8.4 ky BP and that
the 7.14 ky BP only reflected a threshold in salinity
resolves the apparent conflict."

I.e., nothing catastrophic at 7.14 ka (or thereabouts),
nothing related to a chage in Black Sea level,
basically a complete capitulation to the critics of
the BSFlood hypothesis.

In 2003, at a conference session devoted to the topic of the
BSFlood,
Ryan mentions nothing about an event at 7.14 ka BP:

http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/fin...ract_64109.htm

And here's another explanation for the lower-than-100-m-down
shoreline:

http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prAvalon.htm

More he

http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/fin...ract_63243.htm

And he

http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/fin...ract_58733.htm

Hmmm ... what's that subtle taste? I remember it from long ago,
but I so rarely encounter it nowadays ... HAH! That's It! It's
Rationality!


It's a rare beast, more's the pity. Anyway, that's the flood that the
original poster was referring to. Whether it happened or not is a different
matter. My mind's made up on the Noachin one, though. ;)


So's mine.
It was flooding of the area between the lower Tigris and Euphrates
rivers, following years of siltation of the river beds during
a period of reduced flow and increased sediment input due to
erosion in the headwaters after land clearance for agriculture there.
The channels filled up with silt, and the next time that there was
a really large flow of water on the two rivers at the same time, the
channnels could not handle the flow, and the area between them flooded
completely so that no dry land could be seen anywhere.
The "whole world" was flooded.
Except maybe on the occasional tell: Noah's Ark might have been
a pile of dirt.

Daryl Krupa

Honus December 5th 04 12:04 AM


"Daryl Krupa" wrote in message
om...
"Honus" wrote in message

news:pTcrd.4219$wr6.1893@trnddc04...


Did you catch the bit about the "concentrations of
zinc and copper"? That one really caught me off guard! I'm usre that

they
didn't mean for it to be as funny as I found it. g


No, I didn't; which page is it on, please?


Page 615 of the document, page 43 of the pdf.

"One of the two samples from Site (dive 29) had concentrations of zinc and
copper, which are typically associated with excrement and urine."




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com