Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = starman wrote in message
= = = ... Richard Larson wrote: I see both the Sony SW 55 and SW 77 on ebay. Which is better ? Why ? The SW77 because it has a good sync' detector. Here are the details: http://www.dxing.com/rx/icfsw55.htm RL, Never had my hands on a Sony ICF-SW55, but I have been able to play with the Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver a few times. Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver product information by Universal-Radio.Com http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...able/2493.html Radio Netherlands Review of the Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver http://www2.rnw.nl/rnw/en/features/m...s/icfsw77.html Radio Netherlands Shortwave Radios and Receivers by "Price Ranges" http://www2.rnw.nl/rnw/en/features/m.../rx_sort2.html eHAM Owner's Reviews of the Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/480 Tecsun Radio Club 'review' of the Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver http://www.tecsun.com.cn/radioclub/s...y-ICF-SW77.htm Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver 'snap-shot' by RigPix.Com http://www.rigpix.com/sony/sony_sw77.htm Sony ICF-SW77 Receiver 'product information' by Sony.Com FM Stereo Multi-Band World Band Receiver http://www.sel.sony.com/SEL/consumer...77_specs.shtml The "Sony ICF-SW77 Radio/Receiver" eGroup at YAHOO ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SONYICFSW77/ IMHO: The Sony ICF-SW77 has the size and feel of a 'portable' Table Top Receiver; good sound for a radio of its size; and with 4 "C" Batteries should last longer then the Sony ICF-SW55 which only uses 4 "AA" Batteries. hth ~ RHF .. .. |