RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Diego Garcia (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/47110-diego-garcia.html)

dxAce December 27th 04 04:56 PM

Diego Garcia
 
The female operator in answer to a query from an aircraft after giving weather
information reported no ill effects from the earthquake.

So everything appears well on Diego Garcia.

1653 on 13254 USB

dxAce
Michigan
USA


running dogg December 28th 04 02:54 AM

dxAce wrote:

The female operator in answer to a query from an aircraft after giving weather
information reported no ill effects from the earthquake.

So everything appears well on Diego Garcia.


They got lucky. DG is an atoll (for those who don't know what that is,
look it up), a 30 foot high wave could easily wipe it off the face of
the earth.


1653 on 13254 USB

dxAce
Michigan
USA



[email protected] December 28th 04 03:50 AM

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another 2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if there
really was damage on DG??


dxAce December 28th 04 12:47 PM



wrote:

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another 2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if there
really was damage on DG??


Nah, it's all a big secret to get you conspiracy kooks going!

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the wave itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have 'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else to go but
up the beach.

It's pretty simple physics.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Mark Zenier December 28th 04 08:23 PM

In article , dxAce wrote:


wrote:

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another 2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if there
really was damage on DG??


Nah, it's all a big secret to get you conspiracy kooks going!

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the wave itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have 'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else to go but
up the beach.

It's pretty simple physics.


Yes, I dug out the Nat. Geo. World Atlas and the physical map of the
Indian Ocean shows why some areas like India and Somalia got plastered.
The continental shelf and the shoreline are parallel to the wave front,
so the energy got concentrated vertically. Diego Garcia and the Chagos
have the Chagos Trench that runs east and south of DG, so the energy
could diffract around.

The surprise for me is that Broome and Northwest Australia didn't get
it hard. One description (can't remember if it was in the newspaper or
on one of the American TV news broadcasts) said that in these subduction
quakes, some of the seabed falls and some areas rise. So there's a
dipole effect where, for some directions, the waves cancel out.

They said Sumatra moved 100 ft. I'd hate to be a land surveyor there
using GPS. Until they recalibrate their local benchmarks, it'll be
hopeless.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident



Dionne December 28th 04 09:49 PM


dxAce wrote:
wrote:

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no

damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes

sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another

2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if

there
really was damage on DG??


Nah, it's all a big secret to get you conspiracy kooks going!

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the

wave itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have

'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else

to go but
up the beach.

It's pretty simple physics.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


It all has to do with something called "run-up".........basically, it's
how far the water travels inland which is determined by the sea floor.
USGS has an online walk through on the mechanics of the tsunami. I am
a survivor of the great Alaskan earthquake and subsequent tsunamis in
1964. Did you know that since the initial temblor (off the coast of
Sumatra) there have been a total of 46 exceeding 5.0......and that
there now are indications that a wave was generated as well that
entered the pacific. Interesting stuff here.


dxAce December 28th 04 09:57 PM



Dionne wrote:

dxAce wrote:
wrote:

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no

damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes

sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another

2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if

there
really was damage on DG??


Nah, it's all a big secret to get you conspiracy kooks going!

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the

wave itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have

'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else

to go but
up the beach.

It's pretty simple physics.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


It all has to do with something called "run-up".........basically, it's
how far the water travels inland which is determined by the sea floor.
USGS has an online walk through on the mechanics of the tsunami. I am
a survivor of the great Alaskan earthquake and subsequent tsunamis in
1964. Did you know that since the initial temblor (off the coast of
Sumatra) there have been a total of 46 exceeding 5.0......and that
there now are indications that a wave was generated as well that
entered the pacific. Interesting stuff here.


Yes, there have been a lot of aftershocks. I subscribe to the the service he

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/products/..._services.html

Which notifies me of earthquakes exceeding 5.5 anywhere in the world or 4.5 in
the USA.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Dionne December 28th 04 10:27 PM

Thanx for the link. Didn't know that was hiding in there!


George December 29th 04 12:26 AM

Hi!

I just found this info on the status of Diego Garcia. I was stationed
there for a year (1979-1980) as a member of the US Navy. I was happily
suprised to learn that the island was spared...having spent many hours
roaming the shores of "DG", I know how easily it could be overrun by a
tsunami...don't recall a place as HIGH as 22 feet...The highest spot I
was on was the at the base SWIMMING POOL! It was elevated so that when
you stood at poolside, you were at about room height of surrounding
buildings. I was a lifeguard in my "spare" time. We were standing
port/starboard (12 on 12 off) work schedules at the Naval Security
Group Activity there. I still managed to hold down a part time job!
I was there when we did the failed Iranian Embassy Rescue Mission.
Some of the C-130 crews met at the pool to talk about the
"mission"...no one...even THEM knew exactly where they were going or
why! It was very hush hush. I am also a ham radio operator (WA1JMM)
and although I didn't get to operate while there, I did get a British
Indian Ocean Territory call sign from the British Government...think it
was "VP9GD" or GRD...they used your initials for the call letters! Got
to make one phone patch at the Navy MARS station and then discovered
the Autovon phone system...got to talk to my wife via an very
understanding phone op in Maine! Ah the fond memories of "The Rock"!
George, Senior Chief Petty Officer, USN (Retired).


dxAce December 29th 04 12:45 AM



George wrote:

Hi!

I just found this info on the status of Diego Garcia. I was stationed
there for a year (1979-1980) as a member of the US Navy. I was happily
suprised to learn that the island was spared...having spent many hours
roaming the shores of "DG", I know how easily it could be overrun by a
tsunami...don't recall a place as HIGH as 22 feet...The highest spot I
was on was the at the base SWIMMING POOL! It was elevated so that when
you stood at poolside, you were at about room height of surrounding
buildings. I was a lifeguard in my "spare" time. We were standing
port/starboard (12 on 12 off) work schedules at the Naval Security
Group Activity there. I still managed to hold down a part time job!
I was there when we did the failed Iranian Embassy Rescue Mission.
Some of the C-130 crews met at the pool to talk about the
"mission"...no one...even THEM knew exactly where they were going or
why! It was very hush hush. I am also a ham radio operator (WA1JMM)
and although I didn't get to operate while there, I did get a British
Indian Ocean Territory call sign from the British Government...think it
was "VP9GD" or GRD...they used your initials for the call letters! Got
to make one phone patch at the Navy MARS station and then discovered
the Autovon phone system...got to talk to my wife via an very
understanding phone op in Maine! Ah the fond memories of "The Rock"!
George, Senior Chief Petty Officer, USN (Retired).


http://www.members.tripod.com/carlvillanueva/id22.htm

dxAce
Michigan
USA



tianli December 29th 04 01:09 AM

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the wave
itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have

'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else to go

but
up the beach.


I watched a simulation that showed the main "wave" energy was directed
squarely
towards Sri Lanka. Probably because it was paralell to the fault line near
Indonesia.
While watching the simulation I noted that DG was not in line and quite a
bit outside
(flanked) of this main wave energy.

It's pretty simple physics.


Fluid dynamics is excruciatingly complicated.





dxAce December 29th 04 01:24 AM



tianli wrote:

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the wave

itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have

'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else to go

but
up the beach.


I watched a simulation that showed the main "wave" energy was directed
squarely
towards Sri Lanka. Probably because it was paralell to the fault line near
Indonesia.
While watching the simulation I noted that DG was not in line and quite a
bit outside
(flanked) of this main wave energy.

It's pretty simple physics.


Fluid dynamics is excruciatingly complicated.


It's just to deep for me.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



[email protected] December 29th 04 05:26 PM


wrote:
I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes

sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another

2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if

there
really was damage on DG??


Hi,

I saw your intervention on the net abour the the Diego Garcia base, not
affected by the tsunami. Do you know if the base has played a role in
the warning. Did the navy there, called countries of the region, as
little islands, etc? Bye! Eric


peaceblove December 30th 04 10:52 PM

This is on GlobalSecurity.org:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm

Initial indications are that Diego Garcia was not affected by the
Andaman Tsunami of 26 December 2004. It is located south of the tip of
India, well with in range of what the tsunami, with a max elevation of
22 and an average elevation of only 4 feet. Civilians monitoring
shortwave radio reported on rec.radio.shortwave that a female operator,
in answer to a query from an aircraft after giving weather information,
reported no ill effects from the earthquake.

Officials said the Diego Garcia Navy Support Facility, which houses
about 1,700 military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors, suffered
no damage related to the earthquake and ensuing tsunamis. Personnel at
the facility reported no unusual activity or problems over the weekend.
Diego Garcia, the southernmost island in the Chagos Archipelago, sits
about 1,000 miles south of India and roughly 2,000 miles from the
earthquake's epicenter. Even though an earthquake like Sunday's
will radiate destructive waves in all directions, the damage caused by
the water differs greatly depending on the undersea topography.

Favorable ocean topography minimized the tsunami's impact on the
atoll. Diego Garcia is part of the Chagos Archipelago, situated on the
southernmost part of the Chagos-Laccadive Ridge. To the east lies the
Chagos Trench, a 400 mile long, underwater canyon that ranges in depth
from less than 1,00 meters below the surface to depths that plunge to
over 5,000 meters. It is one of the deepest regions of the Indian
Ocean. Diego Garcia is located to the west of Chagos Trench, which runs
north and south. The depth of the Chagos Trench and grade to the shores
does not allow for tsunamis to build before passing the atoll. The
result of the earthquake was seen as a tidal surge estimated at six
feet.


Mark Zenier wrote:
In article , dxAce

wrote:


wrote:

I talked by phone, about an hour ago, with a gentleman on DG and

he
said they experienced waves 3 to 4 feet high but suffered no

damage.
If the island's elevation is only 4 to 22 feet high, that makes

sense.
But why was there so much damage to the coast of Somalia, another

2000
miles further west, and no damage to DG?? Would they tell us if

there
really was damage on DG??


Nah, it's all a big secret to get you conspiracy kooks going!

But actually it probably has a lot to do with the mechanics of the

wave itself
and the sea floor/bed around Diego Garcia itself. The wave may have

'flowed'
around Diego Garcia, but when it reached Somalia it had nowhere else

to go but
up the beach.

It's pretty simple physics.


Yes, I dug out the Nat. Geo. World Atlas and the physical map of the
Indian Ocean shows why some areas like India and Somalia got

plastered.
The continental shelf and the shoreline are parallel to the wave

front,
so the energy got concentrated vertically. Diego Garcia and the

Chagos
have the Chagos Trench that runs east and south of DG, so the energy
could diffract around.

The surprise for me is that Broome and Northwest Australia didn't get
it hard. One description (can't remember if it was in the newspaper

or
on one of the American TV news broadcasts) said that in these

subduction
quakes, some of the seabed falls and some areas rise. So there's a
dipole effect where, for some directions, the waves cancel out.

They said Sumatra moved 100 ft. I'd hate to be a land surveyor there
using GPS. Until they recalibrate their local benchmarks, it'll be
hopeless.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident



peaceblove December 30th 04 10:56 PM

CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS POST
This is on Deigo Garcia's official US Navy website:
http://www.dg.navy.mil/ then select Tsunami News Update at left-middle
of screen/page.


Initial indications are that Diego Garcia was not affected by the
Andaman Tsunami of 26 December 2004. It is located south of the tip of
India, well with in range of what the tsunami, with a max elevation of
22 and an average elevation of only 4 feet. Civilians monitoring
shortwave radio reported on rec.radio.shortwave that a female operator,
in answer to a query from an aircraft after giving weather information,
reported no ill effects from the earthquake.


Officials said the Diego Garcia Navy Support Facility, which houses
about 1,700 military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors, suffered
no damage related to the earthquake and ensuing tsunamis. Personnel at
the facility reported no unusual activity or problems over the weekend.
Diego Garcia, the southernmost island in the Chagos Archipelago, sits
about 1,000 miles south of India and roughly 2,000 miles from the
earthquake's epicenter. Even though an earthquake like Sunday's
will radiate destructive waves in all directions, the damage caused by
the water differs greatly depending on the undersea topography.


Favorable ocean topography minimized the tsunami's impact on the
atoll. Diego Garcia is part of the Chagos Archipelago, situated on the
southernmost part of the Chagos-Laccadive Ridge. To the east lies the
Chagos Trench, a 400 mile long, underwater canyon that ranges in depth
from less than 1,00 meters below the surface to depths that plunge to
over 5,000 meters. It is one of the deepest regions of the Indian
Ocean. Diego Garcia is located to the west of Chagos Trench, which runs
north and south. The depth of the Chagos Trench and grade to the shores
does not allow for tsunamis to build before passing the atoll. The
result of the earthquake was seen as a tidal surge estimated at six
feet.


peaceblove December 30th 04 10:57 PM

CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS POST
This is on Deigo Garcia's official US Navy website:
http://www.dg.navy.mil/ then select Tsunami News Update at left-middle
of screen/page.


Initial indications are that Diego Garcia was not affected by the
Andaman Tsunami of 26 December 2004. It is located south of the tip of
India, well with in range of what the tsunami, with a max elevation of
22 and an average elevation of only 4 feet. Civilians monitoring
shortwave radio reported on rec.radio.shortwave that a female operator,
in answer to a query from an aircraft after giving weather information,
reported no ill effects from the earthquake.


Officials said the Diego Garcia Navy Support Facility, which houses
about 1,700 military personnel and 1,500 civilian contractors, suffered
no damage related to the earthquake and ensuing tsunamis. Personnel at
the facility reported no unusual activity or problems over the weekend.
Diego Garcia, the southernmost island in the Chagos Archipelago, sits
about 1,000 miles south of India and roughly 2,000 miles from the
earthquake's epicenter. Even though an earthquake like Sunday's
will radiate destructive waves in all directions, the damage caused by
the water differs greatly depending on the undersea topography.


Favorable ocean topography minimized the tsunami's impact on the
atoll. Diego Garcia is part of the Chagos Archipelago, situated on the
southernmost part of the Chagos-Laccadive Ridge. To the east lies the
Chagos Trench, a 400 mile long, underwater canyon that ranges in depth
from less than 1,00 meters below the surface to depths that plunge to
over 5,000 meters. It is one of the deepest regions of the Indian
Ocean. Diego Garcia is located to the west of Chagos Trench, which runs
north and south. The depth of the Chagos Trench and grade to the shores
does not allow for tsunamis to build before passing the atoll. The
result of the earthquake was seen as a tidal surge estimated at six
feet.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com