Rush and shortwave
Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand
reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA |
Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. ************************************************** ********* It would be good if we could get a true conservative on radio. |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? Lucky |
Lucky wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? For the world. dxAce Michigan USA |
"Lucky" wrote in message Great for who?? Lucky Hey Lucky. Are you still going to cripple Al P? Just curious? B.H. |
dxAce wrote:
Lucky wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? For the world. Say what you want about Rush's political views, at least he's not a Konspiracy Kook or a bible thumping fundamentalist preacher. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Brian Hill wrote:
"Lucky" wrote in message Great for who?? Lucky Hey Lucky. Are you still going to cripple Al P? Just curious? Al's mind is already crippled. Too much bible thumping. I think it causes infected blisters, and the infection goes up into the brain, and makes them stupid. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Lucky" wrote in message ... "dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? Lucky I didn't know they let drug addicts on the air. |
FDR wrote:
"Lucky" wrote in message ... "dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? Lucky I didn't know they let drug addicts on the air. Gene Scott chainsmoked his way to an early grave. Tobacco is a drug. Of course, the TRUE kooks don't need drugs to make them crazy. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
FDR wrote: "Lucky" wrote in message ... "dxAce" wrote in message ... Rush just mentioned being on shortwave a few minutes ago. Kind of an offhand reference to WRNO, which did carry him years ago. He mentioned maybe looking into being on shortwave again. He may not realise that he is currently on AFN shortwave for the first hour, but it would be great if he could be on shortwave for the entire 3 hours. dxAce Michigan USA Great for who?? Lucky I didn't know they let drug addicts on the air. Well, they let you use the internet. dxAce Michigan USA |
DX Ace,
|
On 5 Mar 2005 04:48:54 -0800, "RHF"
wrote: Yes - Rush Limbaugh could be on Shortwave Radio and Heard 24/7 Around the World That would be the final nail in the HF broadcasting coffin. Look, unless you're in the middle of nowhere there are much better ways to get the variety of programming once exclusive to HFBC. It's the 21st Century people. |
DaviD - Yes it is the 21st Century.
|
DX Ace,
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:41:45 -0800, running dogg wrote:
David wrote: I have been getting my news almost exclusively from International Broadcsters for decades. I do read the local rags for local news. The best day of my International Broadcasting life was when XM started offering the BBC World Service 24/7 in HIFI, followed by Sirius with BBCWS News and WRN. I have my shortwaves for hobby purposes, my news craving has moved on. What will you do when XM and Sirius drop the BBC or "censor" it the way the satellite services do with CBC's As It Happens? I figure it will happen about the time that the US government comes for our radios. You seem very concerned about that, but not about the fact that anything that comes over a satellite can be censored or dropped by the well connected corporation that provides the satellite service. Like with TV satellite, just TWO big corporations control satellite radio. THEY control what you hear and don't hear. With shortwave, *I* control what I hear (well, me and the ionosphere, but at least the ionosphere can't be controlled by a big corporation or a government-yet). That alone makes shortwave superior to a corporate controlled, fee for service satellite media source. When the US government censors satellite as heavily as they do broadcast and cable media, deciding what gets to be aired and making sure there's nothing "seditious" there that might give the sheep ideas, shortwave will still be there, still giving UNFILTERED news from a multitude of countries (well, there's still the propaganda factor to consider, but at least shortwave content is not passed through a couple big all powerful entities), and still unblockable, uncensorable, and defying all attempts at jamming. I suspect the day will come when posessing a shortwave radio is a capital offense in the US, like it is in North Korea, and the ultimate in news sources is illegal to listen to precisely because the government cannot control it. Government can control MW/FM/broadcast TV, cable TV, and satellite services, but they can't control shortwave. On 5 Mar 2005 16:01:21 -0800, "RHF" wrote: DaviD - Oh So America-Centric of 'you' ! . MW/FM Radio is what ever your native country allows to be heard. . The Internet is what ever your native country allows in via the WWW. . Worldspace, Sirius and XM offer a very limited 'global' coverage. . The 1M, 10M, 100M or more Un-Reachable People of the World International Shortwave Radio can be the Door-Way to News and Information that is un-filtered by their native countries. . expand your mind - get the big picture - hear 'the rush' ~ RHF . . ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- The government doesn't censor regular radio. The regular radio censors itself. I didn't say I was going to sell all my radios. I'm keeping them handy. Right now, though, I'm really digging the freedom to tune into the Beeb or Radio Australia or Koln without any static. The American people are so freaked-out and scatterbrained already the government sees no need to be overtly restrictive on the flow of information. People don't even notice the bad news when it's right in front of them. Might as well go down in flames with full-bandwidth audio, don't you think? |
RHF wrote:
DaviD - Can 'you' Get This - It's NOT About 'you' [.] . Its' About the "Un-Reachable People" of the World being able to Hear International Shortwave Radio; and having a Door-Way to News and Information that is un-filtered and not controlled by their native countries and governments. . me, Me. ME ! - the world according to david ~ RHF . [ Rush Limbaugh 24/7 on International Shortwave Radio World Wide. ] In Sacramento we have an FM station called Howard 93.7. "Howard in the morning...Stern all day". Yes, they play Howard Stern 24/7. Whoever thought this up should be shot. I suspect that Rush 93.7 would be about the same, just the opposite end of the spectrum. Who wants to hear the SAME GUY ranting on and on all the time, except followers of Gene Scott? That said, I suspect that Rush Limbaugh will have very little interest in him outside of the US. His commentary is very America centric, and he represents a political bloc that doesn't exist in other English speaking countries. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
I listen to the Coast Guard and other Utilities.
The SWBC bands are a very small fraction of the HF spectrum. On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:58:00 -0800, running dogg wrote: David wrote: Between MW/FM, the internets, Worldspace, Sirius and XM, there aren't that many ''unreachable'' people left. Certainly not enough for most countries to justify the expense of maintaining a fleet of 250 kW transmitters around the world. Just as I thought. You really don't care about shortwave, just about spreading your ideology. Well, go spread it someplace else, like talk.politics.misc, or alt.conspiracy. The same goes for Al Patrick, who is more interested in the narrow ideology of the kooks on shortwave rather than on getting the many varied viewpoints shortwave offers. I suspect that most of the people here aren't really concerned about shortwave as a hobby, just about finding another outlet for getting "news" that agrees with their worldview. Well, there's something on shortwave for everybody, but try stepping outside your closed little world and listening to viewpoints other than yours. On 5 Mar 2005 13:43:59 -0800, "RHF" wrote: DaviD - Yes it is the 21st Century. . However Shortwave Radio is still one of the best ways Today to 'reach' the Un-Reachable People of the World. . Rush Limbaugh on Shortwave Radio to be Heard 24/7 Around the World. [ Every Conservative's Dream -and- Every Liberal's Nightmare ] . dream on, Dream On. DREAM ON ! ~ RHF . . ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
RD - Hello it's a Metaphor.
|
I don't understand why clear channel would want to broadcast on
shortwave. Shortwave is just a medium, and not many people have the equipment to receive on that medium in the US. There is a reason that shortwave is dominated by government and privately owned stations that are subsidized by non-advertising money. The reason is small audience and no advertisers equates to no profit. Broadcast FM & MW and satellite FM have a much much bigger base of listeners and clear channel will go where the advertising and subscription money is. I have to admit that it would indeed be humurous to have Rush Limbaugh holding forth next to bible pounders, survivalists, denizens of the Montana forest and those who are still sure the commies are still poised to invade the U.S. via Mexico. Rush has a loyal group of followers now so why risk losing some by switching to a relatively unkown medium like shortwave. It would make as much sense to broadcast on LW. I'm still completely confused by: "Substitute the Name "Rush Limbaugh" for any of the Top 25 AM/FM Talk Radio Talents. Put each of them on Three Hours a Day which equals Eight Regular Hosts Around-the-Clock Monday thru Friday with several other Hosts representing 'different voices' featured during the Week-End." |
|
Rush Limbaugh and his bible thumping oppressive bull**** he spews out
of his ass is laughable, but its scary such oppressive people exist who think they know whats best for you and your family while talking about how "liberals" are trying to control your life.. Lmao. |
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:05:21 -0500, dxAce
wrote: Switching? who mentioned switching? Rush was on WRNO years ago because the owner liked his program and decided to air it. If Rush were to air the ENTIRE program (it is on AFN currently for one hour), it would be in 'conjunction with' his current line-up of over 600 stations and not a 'switch' to shortwave. Some of you out there need to learn how to think things through. Yes, I know you're 'confused', but give thinking a tryout, you might like it! dxAce Michigan USA The owner of WRNO also liked to fondle Boy Scouts. What's that say about Limbaugh's minions? |
The key phrase is that he WAS on shortwave. One not well run station
that closed and he was periodically rebroadcast on AFN. There would be no benefit to using shortwave shortwave - he would not gain any new audience. And some of his broadcast advertisers might think twice about doing business with him if he got the reputation of keeping company with programs like "The End is Coming" and "Modern Survivalism in the U.S." His somewhat condescending comment to the caller was more appeasement to keep him listening. It would be humorous to hear Rush ruminating over the Clinton-years-now-long-gone alongside the usual talent on 5mhz. I'm still completely confused by: " Substitute the Name "Rush Limbaugh" for any of the Top 25 AM/FM Talk Radio Talents. Put each of them on Three Hours a Day which equals Eight Regular Hosts Around-the-Clock Monday thru Friday with several other Hosts representing 'different voices' featured during the Week-End What are you trying to say..... |
David wrote: On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:05:21 -0500, dxAce wrote: Switching? who mentioned switching? Rush was on WRNO years ago because the owner liked his program and decided to air it. If Rush were to air the ENTIRE program (it is on AFN currently for one hour), it would be in 'conjunction with' his current line-up of over 600 stations and not a 'switch' to shortwave. Some of you out there need to learn how to think things through. Yes, I know you're 'confused', but give thinking a tryout, you might like it! dxAce Michigan USA The owner of WRNO also liked to fondle Boy Scouts. What's that say about Limbaugh's minions? You're a 'tard. Does that necessarily mean the rest of your family are 'tards? dxAce Michigan USA |
|
Unless WRNO was resurrected AFN feeds are the only ones I'm aware of.
dxAce wrote: wrote: The key phrase is that he WAS on shortwave. Please try to pay attention... he STILL is on shortwave. Damn 'tard boys just cain't pay attention for even a single second, can you? Check back in when you get a clue! dxAce Michigan USA |
From the Limbaugh site is a listing of all stations carrying his
program including one WRNO for 2 hours. To the best of my knowlege WRNO shortwave is silent. On which stations is the windy-one carried. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/men...guest.all.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com