how not to do a radio web site
 

I hate to be mean, but here is an example of how not to do a radio web
site. it is full of the worst samples of receivers that I have ever
seen. many of the receivers look like they came from a burnt down house

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/BCLradio.html

schrieb:

I hate to be mean, but here is an example of how not to do a radio web
site. it is full of the worst samples of receivers that I have ever
seen. many of the receivers look like they came from a burnt down house

The images looks like they were resized rather badly (at least in part)
and saved as JPEG with very heavy compression. That tells more about the
image editing skills of the author and potential space limits on the
server than the receivers themselves. Someone who's been surfing the web
for a while should be able to recognize JPEG artifacts, really.

BTW, at least now I know what this Quelle Universum labeled "Parabola
3000" (?) receiver that recently went on Ebay was - a Toshiba RT-2880.

Stephan
--
Home: http://stephan.win31.de/
PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W

I don't know if it is all that bad. I've used it several times as a
reference.


wrote:
I hate to be mean, but here is an example of how not to do a radio
web
site. it is full of the worst samples of receivers that I have ever
seen. many of the receivers look like they came from a burnt down
house

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/BCLradio.html

And your website URL is ??

--
C. L. - Reader Beware
--
I doubt, therefore I might be !


wrote in message
oups.com...
I hate to be mean, but here is an example of how not to do a radio web
site. it is full of the worst samples of receivers that I have ever
seen. many of the receivers look like they came from a burnt down house

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/BCLradio.html

the stains on this radio are not artifacts, and the knobs are not
correct, I guess if you knew radios, you could tell that.

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/ssr-1.html

wrote in message
oups.com...
the stains on this radio are not artifacts, and the knobs are not
correct, I guess if you knew radios, you could tell that.

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/ssr-1.html


You just gotta love Babelfish translations... I may as well have just tried
to read the original Japanese.. ROFL!!!

SSR-1 ????
1975 sale XXYEN 69500
10Khz - 30MHzAM USB LSB preselector -, ??????? and 10Khz direct reading

If seventies at that time, you mentioned "????", it was the brand of yearn
existence of the radio young priest. SPR-4 30 ten thousand Yen or less,
digital DSR-2 115 ten thousand Yen. The ? ? ? ? ? it is high!

The ???? way the ? which is coming into view at convenient price. Although
with you rejoiced, this design how the thing? Speaking well, simple,
speaking badly, you cannot feel dignity.
"As for the populace being patient with this"? Is -, design eightfold state
FRG-7 decisively calling. In the use report of the magazine FRG-7, the kind
of air whose appraisal is high does.

Regrettable the knob of the possession machine is not original.
Just a little it meaning that photograph reflection is bad, it is the
schedule which future does again to take.

wrote:
I hate to be mean, but here is an example of how not to do a radio web
site. it is full of the worst samples of receivers that I have ever
seen. many of the receivers look like they came from a burnt down
house

http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~ghq777/BCLradio.html

I like that RP-2000F. Anyone ever see that before?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

That's an unusual one. I've seen exactly one Hitachi SW, and that was
a small portable at the original EEB store in the early 1980's.

He has some interesting receivers that I've never seen but would love
to own. The RF1010, and FR6600 look interesting, but are probably
impossible to find outside of Japan.

The website owner does have a rare copy of the small table version of
the R-300. It was a little known model that was compressed especially
for for apartment owners.