LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old April 17th 05, 02:16 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:43:50 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


The Inverted-vee is a center (or off-center) fed dipole with it's ends lower
than the feedpoint. Rarely a desired design, it usually results from being
unable to elevate both ends equal to the feedpoint of a half wave dipole. It
nonetheless works fairly well and is a "complete" antenna, requiring no
grounding. It is not a vertical antenna as Ace suggested.


They are generally vertically oriented, therefore the 'inverted vee'
designation.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

''Efficiency is less than a horizontal dipole of similar height, but
the radiation pattern is more omni-directional which may be considered
to be an advantage.''

http://www.smeter.net/antennas/inv_vee.php

I think characterising the Inverted V as an ''inferior'' choice is
wrong.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEC Section 810 Online? Jim Miller Antenna 10 April 8th 05 06:14 AM
Single ground Bill Ogden Antenna 26 November 25th 04 03:47 AM
Lightning Strikes Boat Anchor morris.verlander Boatanchors 1 June 13th 04 02:26 AM
Balun Grounding Question ? John Doty Shortwave 4 November 25th 03 12:29 PM
Antenna mount Jason Wagner Scanner 12 August 12th 03 09:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017