![]() |
David wrote: On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:47:19 -0400, dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: - Don't approve of what Johnson did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Nixon did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Fonda did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Bush did - Don't approve of what Smith did.. I don't approve of what Diver Dan did... he supported a known, self admitted, war criminal for the high office of President of The United States of America. dxAce Michigan USA Name a modern-day president who wasn't a war criminal. Give me a ****ing break. Self admitted? Actual on the ground war crimes? YOU give me a ****ing break, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
"David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:47:19 -0400, dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: - Don't approve of what Johnson did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Nixon did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Fonda did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Bush did - Don't approve of what Smith did.. I don't approve of what Diver Dan did... he supported a known, self admitted, war criminal for the high office of President of The United States of America. dxAce Michigan USA Name a modern-day president who wasn't a war criminal. Give me a ****ing break. Name ONE. And see if you can actually back this up with facts and not some idiotic commentary from buzzflash. |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:19:18 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:47:19 -0400, dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: - Don't approve of what Johnson did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Nixon did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Fonda did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Bush did - Don't approve of what Smith did.. I don't approve of what Diver Dan did... he supported a known, self admitted, war criminal for the high office of President of The United States of America. dxAce Michigan USA Name a modern-day president who wasn't a war criminal. Give me a ****ing break. Name ONE. And see if you can actually back this up with facts and not some idiotic commentary from buzzflash. War crime is redundant. |
"David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:19:18 -0500, "MnMikew" wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:47:19 -0400, dxAce wrote: Dan wrote: - Don't approve of what Johnson did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Nixon did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Fonda did in Viet nam - Don't approve of what Bush did - Don't approve of what Smith did.. I don't approve of what Diver Dan did... he supported a known, self admitted, war criminal for the high office of President of The United States of America. dxAce Michigan USA Name a modern-day president who wasn't a war criminal. Give me a ****ing break. Name ONE. And see if you can actually back this up with facts and not some idiotic commentary from buzzflash. War crime is redundant. You're right. It was a crime in 1941 when we declared war on Japan. Sheese. |
David wrote:
War crime is redundant. No, it isn't. If your country is invaded you aren't a criminal for fighting the invaders, and neither are those who are willing to help defend your homeland. If you believe otherwise you are either deluded, or a coward. -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:39:33 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote: War crime is redundant. You're right. It was a crime in 1941 when we declared war on Japan. Sheese. Thinking like it's still 1941 is definitely a crime of some kind. Two things changed the world forever: Trinity (the one in New Mexico) and Apollo 8. Ponder it for a while. http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/image...ature_102.html |
"David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:39:33 -0500, "MnMikew" wrote: War crime is redundant. You're right. It was a crime in 1941 when we declared war on Japan. Sheese. Thinking like it's still 1941 is definitely a crime of some kind. Two things changed the world forever: Trinity (the one in New Mexico) and Apollo 8. Ponder it for a while. Three things, 9/11. Ponder that. |
"David" wrote in message Give me a ****ing break. Which leg? B.H. |
In article ,
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: David wrote: War crime is redundant. No, it isn't. If your country is invaded you aren't a criminal for fighting the invaders, and neither are those who are willing to help defend your homeland. If you believe otherwise you are either deluded, or a coward. It is most likely that he is deluded AND a coward. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com