RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Sony SW77 vs. ICF-2010 (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/69980-re-sony-sw77-vs-icf-2010-a.html)

running dogg April 29th 05 12:30 AM

Sony SW77 vs. ICF-2010
 
derFlieger wrote:

I'm having a hard time deciding between these two radios - the sony
sw77 or the 2010 - I know both would be used if I purchased one.
If spending same amount of money - which radio would you want - and
why. Thanks very much for the help!
P


The 2010 was tops in its day, and better than the 77 IMO. But good luck
finding one for a reasonable price-ebay has pushed up prices on 2010's
to ridiculous levels. Given that reality, a 77 might be more within
reach financially.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Brian Denley April 29th 05 03:57 AM

derFlieger wrote:
I'm having a hard time deciding between these two radios - the sony
sw77 or the 2010 - I know both would be used if I purchased one.
If spending same amount of money - which radio would you want - and
why. Thanks very much for the help!
P


The SW77 is more 'portable sized' for travel if that's important to you.
They are both good receivers


--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html



[email protected] April 29th 05 04:34 AM


Brian Denley wrote:
derFlieger wrote:
I'm having a hard time deciding between these two radios - the sony
sw77 or the 2010 - I know both would be used if I purchased one.
If spending same amount of money - which radio would you want - and
why. Thanks very much for the help!
P


The SW77 is more 'portable sized' for travel if that's important to

you.
They are both good receivers


--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html


Performance-wise I find them indistinguishable. You might prefer the
ergonomics of the 2010, as some people complain that the SW77 is
difficult to use--though I don't find it difficult.

Steve


Joe Jax April 29th 05 03:09 PM

Consider there is little to listen to on the SW bands nowadays, you will
find that both radios can receive static equally well.



[email protected] April 29th 05 04:37 PM


Joe Jax wrote:
Consider there is little to listen to on the SW bands nowadays, you

will
find that both radios can receive static equally well.


What are you using? A Grundig Mini-World? Last night the bands were
practically bursting at the seams on my R8B.

Steve


Telamon April 30th 05 04:05 AM

In article ,
"Joe Jax" wrote:

Consider there is little to listen to on the SW bands nowadays, you will
find that both radios can receive static equally well.


There are more stations than blank spots on the bands.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

mike0219116 April 30th 05 05:21 PM

I've never owned a 2010, but I've had a SW77 for a couple of years now.
I like it for the most part. I love the menu system that it uses for
storing station presets. The only thing I don't like about it is its
audio, which I fine to be muffled/muddy. I don't know if the audio on
the 2010 is any better.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com