|
Honus wrote:
Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? He just gets a kick out of calling everyone 'tard boy. Same thing over and over, you know, just like someone retarded often does. |
Mexico furious: RealID Act to protect border and enforce laws
The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of
Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse |
|
beerbarrel wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2005 12:46:56 GMT, " wrote: wrote: The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse A great place to train our military for live fire anti invasion excellent training! It IS an invasion. Amen Brother! Let's do a Canuck wall Too! The Maple Leaf Curtain. dxAce Michigan USA |
dxAce wrote: beerbarrel wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2005 12:46:56 GMT, " wrote: wrote: The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse A great place to train our military for live fire anti invasion excellent training! It IS an invasion. Amen Brother! Let's do a Canuck wall Too! The Maple Leaf Curtain. It'd be nice too if we could build it high enough to block that cold wind as well. dxAce Michigan USA |
If the US economy ever falters badly, something that is a distinct possibility within the next 30 years... ************************************************** *** Did you say 30 years? I'd say about 30 months. United airlines can't provide a pension for their workers, General Motors is nearly broke and Ford isn't much better. The jobs we are creating are mainly service type jobs that go mainly to Mexicans. I think the house of cards is going to fall soon unless we have some drastic things happen. RJT. |
running dogg wrote: Conan Ford wrote: http://news.ft.com/cms/s/bf6dcbe2-c3...00e2511c8.html Mexico has reacted furiously to a bill signed into law by the US this week that would fund a border wall and prevent illegal Mexican migrants from obtaining US driving licences. President Vicente Fox said he would lodge a diplomatic complaint, and was considering complaints to multilateral bodies if Mexico could not unable to resolve the problem bilaterally. In the US, leaders of the Mexican community threatened to strike to send a message to US employers that they could not survive without cheap Mexican labour. Santiago Creel, Mexico's interior secretary, said the “Real ID” law was “negative, inconvenient, and obstructionist”. “Building walls doesn't help anyone build a good neighbourhood,” he said. “Taking away the possibility of obtaining driving licences for people who are working in legal jobs, who pay their taxes there, who send remittances home here, seems to us to be an extreme measure, particularly given the new understanding that we thought we had after the re-election of President Bush.” ....... I think this pretty much exposes the whole agenda of the government of Mexico---The US is not to protect its borders, the USA is not to enforce its laws. Now, I would like to see something done about employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. Did you know that it is a federal felony to do so? Did you know that some states, like Colorado, specifically forbid local law enforcement from assisting the feds. in immigration matters? They also forbid, under "sanctuary" laws, employers from not hiring people they suspect of being illegal. I wonder how much of the Mexican economy runs on illegals sending their meager American paychecks home to their families. Judging from Fox's reaction, it's a LOT. You'd think that the Mexicans would be more interested in developing their own educational system (the average Mexican has a fourth grade education, I think) so that Mexicans would be able to create jobs within Mexico that would pay well and create a stable middle class that in turn could support an advanced economy instead of basing the whole country's existence on mooching off the rich gringos. A country that has its whole economy and society based on fleecing the rich is a giant welfare state, and is therefore inherently unstable (as well as doomed to poverty and mediocrity). If the US economy ever falters badly, something that is a distinct possibility within the next 30 years, Mexico will be brought to the verge of chaos, like Argentina was five years ago when the rich stopped investing there. Argentina learned the hard way that basing your economy on welfare handed out by the rich is a bad idea. Mexico is headed down that same road. I've heard it said that as far as income goes oil exports are #1, tourism is #2 and the remittences from workers in the US are #3. dxAce Michigan USA |
'They step on the soil, vaporize them. Time to quit f...ing around, there's
too much at stake!! East to West mini-nuke test range would be good. Great for testing those battlefield nukes. Common *******s, lets see 'ya run --- that's it ---- gotya's! "dxAce" wrote in message ... running dogg wrote: Conan Ford wrote: http://news.ft.com/cms/s/bf6dcbe2-c3...00e2511c8.html Mexico has reacted furiously to a bill signed into law by the US this week that would fund a border wall and prevent illegal Mexican migrants from obtaining US driving licences. President Vicente Fox said he would lodge a diplomatic complaint, and was considering complaints to multilateral bodies if Mexico could not unable to resolve the problem bilaterally. In the US, leaders of the Mexican community threatened to strike to send a message to US employers that they could not survive without cheap Mexican labour. Santiago Creel, Mexico's interior secretary, said the "Real ID" law was "negative, inconvenient, and obstructionist". "Building walls doesn't help anyone build a good neighbourhood," he said. "Taking away the possibility of obtaining driving licences for people who are working in legal jobs, who pay their taxes there, who send remittances home here, seems to us to be an extreme measure, particularly given the new understanding that we thought we had after the re-election of President Bush." ....... I think this pretty much exposes the whole agenda of the government of Mexico---The US is not to protect its borders, the USA is not to enforce its laws. Now, I would like to see something done about employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. Did you know that it is a federal felony to do so? Did you know that some states, like Colorado, specifically forbid local law enforcement from assisting the feds. in immigration matters? They also forbid, under "sanctuary" laws, employers from not hiring people they suspect of being illegal. I wonder how much of the Mexican economy runs on illegals sending their meager American paychecks home to their families. Judging from Fox's reaction, it's a LOT. You'd think that the Mexicans would be more interested in developing their own educational system (the average Mexican has a fourth grade education, I think) so that Mexicans would be able to create jobs within Mexico that would pay well and create a stable middle class that in turn could support an advanced economy instead of basing the whole country's existence on mooching off the rich gringos. A country that has its whole economy and society based on fleecing the rich is a giant welfare state, and is therefore inherently unstable (as well as doomed to poverty and mediocrity). If the US economy ever falters badly, something that is a distinct possibility within the next 30 years, Mexico will be brought to the verge of chaos, like Argentina was five years ago when the rich stopped investing there. Argentina learned the hard way that basing your economy on welfare handed out by the rich is a bad idea. Mexico is headed down that same road. I've heard it said that as far as income goes oil exports are #1, tourism is #2 and the remittences from workers in the US are #3. dxAce Michigan USA |
|
beerbarrel tried to write:
I don't think many yanks would want to go to the great white ********! Sounds like you belong on the Mexican side ASSHOLE!!! Many of us "Yanks" own property/businesses in the great white ********. A lotta "Yanks" would spit in your face for spewing such garbage. 'Just comes natural for you to say such things though. Flows easy as the drool from your 'bacco juice right lowlife? Get some respect for yourself ..... the rest'll come to 'ya!! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org |
Your reponse says it all!!
I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:16:58 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: beerbarrel tried to write: I don't think many yanks would want to go to the great white ********! Sounds like you belong on the Mexican side ASSHOLE!!! Many of us "Yanks" own property/businesses in the great white ********. A lotta "Yanks" would spit in your face for spewing such garbage. 'Just comes natural for you to say such things though. Flows easy as the drool from your 'bacco juice right lowlife? Get some respect for yourself ..... the rest'll come to 'ya!! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Have you figured out where you're at yet Waldo? _____________________ www.ReformUS.org |
"beerbarrel" wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:55:57 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: Your reponse says it all!! I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL Why don't you write like an adult? What are you about 10? There goes another irony meter. |
beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2005 19:18:09 GMT, "Honus" wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:55:57 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: Your reponse says it all!! I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL Why don't you write like an adult? What are you about 10? There goes another irony meter. Did you find Waldo Honkus? Honkus.... LOLOLOLOL dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2005 19:18:09 GMT, "Honus" wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:55:57 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: Your reponse says it all!! I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL Why don't you write like an adult? What are you about 10? There goes another irony meter. Did you find Waldo Honkus? Honkus.... LOLOLOLOL Get a room. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2005 19:18:09 GMT, "Honus" wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:55:57 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: Your reponse says it all!! I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL Why don't you write like an adult? What are you about 10? There goes another irony meter. Did you find Waldo Honkus? Honkus.... LOLOLOLOL Get a room. Like yours... padded? dxAce Michgan USA |
beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2005 20:36:13 GMT, "Honus" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2005 19:18:09 GMT, "Honus" wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:55:57 -0400, "Waldo" wrote: Your reponse says it all!! I'd much rather be on the Mexican side....at least you can trust em.... Yes sir! Sayz it ALL Why don't you write like an adult? What are you about 10? There goes another irony meter. Did you find Waldo Honkus? Honkus.... LOLOLOLOL Get a room. He wants you Ace...hahahahaha! Everyone does! dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. |
"beerbarrel" wrote in message ... He wants you Ace...hahahahaha! Once again, the tower of intellect and repartee known as beerbarrel speaks. Man, you just aren't funny. Even cuhulin (may he RIP) had his occasional moments of humor; you don't even approach his low standard. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? I believe I already did. Please try to pay attention. dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? I believe I already did. Please try to pay attention. Then you believe wrongly. I know this because I've been paying attention. Please try again to answer the question directly. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? I believe I already did. Please try to pay attention. Then you believe wrongly. I know this because I've been paying attention. Please try again to answer the question directly. LMAO at the clueless Honkus. (Go through the thread boy, and you might just figure it out). dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? I believe I already did. Please try to pay attention. Then you believe wrongly. I know this because I've been paying attention. Please try again to answer the question directly. LMAO at the clueless Honkus. (Go through the thread boy, and you might just figure it out). I specifically left the majority of the thread intact for -your- benefit, Ace. Don't let my efforts got to waste. The animosity is coming from -you-. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Get a room. Like yours... padded? That depends on how rough you and beerbarrel like it. It's all up to you. Oooooh... queer boy talk. Honkus, you might actually get a date with Rickets. Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? I guess it's coming from you. You'd guess wrong. This was between beerbarrel and me until you chimed in. I rarely ever guess wrong. This time you did. Why don't you answer the question directly? I believe I already did. Please try to pay attention. Then you believe wrongly. I know this because I've been paying attention. Please try again to answer the question directly. LMAO at the clueless Honkus. (Go through the thread boy, and you might just figure it out). I specifically left the majority of the thread intact for -your- benefit, Ace. Don't let my efforts got to waste. The animosity is coming from -you-. Nope... all I did was laugh (LOLOLOL) at the 'Honkus' moniker... after that, 'tard boy, it began with your 'get a room' comment. Now, do me a favour, and go shove something very large up your fricking queer ass and break it off, you stinking piece of know nothing ****. Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Nope... all I did was laugh (LOLOLOL) at the 'Honkus' moniker... after that, 'tard boy, it began with your 'get a room' comment. Laughing at someone calling me a name is animosity. You started it bewteen us. Now, do me a favour, and go shove something very large up your fricking queer ass and break it off, you stinking piece of know nothing ****. Ha! Looks like I got under your skin. I call that a win for me, puppet. gbg Continue to tote. And that's definitely a loss for Team dxAce; you're as uncreative as beerbarrel, and that's pretty damned bad. |
Honus wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: Nope... all I did was laugh (LOLOLOL) at the 'Honkus' moniker... after that, 'tard boy, it began with your 'get a room' comment. Laughing at someone calling me a name is animosity. You started it bewteen us. No, I was simply laughing at the 'Honkus' moniker. It tickled me funnybone. The escalation was all yours, queer boy. Now, do me a favour, and go shove something very large up your fricking queer ass and break it off, you stinking piece of know nothing ****. Ha! Looks like I got under your skin. I call that a win for me, puppet. gbg No, you are still on the losing end, 'tard. Little if anything gets under my skin these days. Continue to tote. And that's definitely a loss for Team dxAce; you're as uncreative as beerbarrel, and that's pretty damned bad. Team? Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA |
Honus wrote:
And that's definitely a loss for Team dxAce; you're as uncreative as beerbarrel, and that's pretty damned bad. Please leave the special needs students alone. mike |
If the Mexicans are REALLY kept out, who will do all the hard work?
America has relied on cheap immigrant labor for 400 years. Hudley Pearse |
wrote in message oups.com... The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse They didnt have .50 cals mounted on their wall. |
On 15 May 2005 14:13:44 GMT, (Frank White)
wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 14 May 2005 12:46:56 GMT, " wrote: wrote: The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse A great place to train our military for live fire anti invasion excellent training! It IS an invasion. Amen Brother! Let's do a Canuck wall Too! I'd think the Canadians would want to build that one, themselves, to keep the crazy Yanks out... Right -- build the wall across the Canadian border. Then the next time we shut down our airspace they can tell us to fly our ungrateful asses to Mexico if we want to land. |
wrote: On 15 May 2005 14:13:44 GMT, (Frank White) wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 14 May 2005 12:46:56 GMT, " wrote: wrote: The Great Wall of China never kept anyone out, and the Great Wall of Texas probably won't either. Hudley Pearse A great place to train our military for live fire anti invasion excellent training! It IS an invasion. Amen Brother! Let's do a Canuck wall Too! I'd think the Canadians would want to build that one, themselves, to keep the crazy Yanks out... Right -- build the wall across the Canadian border. Then the next time we shut down our airspace they can tell us to fly our ungrateful asses to Mexico if we want to land. CanaDuh is not in much of a position to tell us to do anything. dxAce Michigan USA |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: Honus wrote: Alright, dxAce...what's your problem? I've never butted heads with you before; where's this animosity coming from? He just gets a kick out of calling everyone 'tard boy. Same thing over and over, you know, just like someone retarded often does. Nah, I simply called him 'tard boy because he got his knickers in a knot over my laughing at the 'Honkus' moniker bestowed upon him. Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:06:13 -0400, beerbarrel
wrote: can cook and appreciate the chance to make a living. The Canucks want to sit at home and let the US take care of their candy asses! Oh, I almost forgot, they like to harbor draft dodgers too. They love cowards don't they? It takes one to know one I guess! Year of entry to World War II: UK - 1939 Canada - 1939 USA - 1941 Mexico - 1942 -- Andrew Oakley andrew/atsymbol/aoakley/stop/com |
beerbarrel wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2005 12:48:13 GMT, Andrew Oakley wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:06:13 -0400, beerbarrel wrote: can cook and appreciate the chance to make a living. The Canucks want to sit at home and let the US take care of their candy asses! Oh, I almost forgot, they like to harbor draft dodgers too. They love cowards don't they? It takes one to know one I guess! Year of entry to World War II: UK - 1939 Canada - 1939 USA - 1941 Mexico - 1942 Canada sent 3 people! The tide turned in 41... Yeah, and if we'd entered into the war in 1939 there'd be someone still screaming that we did it without a 'coalition' or something. There's just no making the 'tards happy. Besides, CanaDuh is a part of the UK anyway... ;-) dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com