Beaming shortwave from satellite/space
 

Wouldn't that provide a better coverage with less fading compared to
traditional approach? Or is it that shortwave needs ionosphere to
work at all? Thanks.

"Jim" wrote in message
om...
Wouldn't that provide a better coverage with less fading compared to
traditional approach? Or is it that shortwave needs ionosphere to
work at all? Thanks.

Seems to me that the signal would have a pretty difficult time penetrating
the ionosphere at HF frequencies.There are of course complications to that
answer, such as MUF and incident angle, but in general if the ionosphere
acts to reflect earth originated signals, it will do the same to space
originated signals.

Dale W4OP

Jim wrote:
Wouldn't that provide a better coverage with less fading compared to
traditional approach? Or is it that shortwave needs ionosphere to
work at all? Thanks.

When you transmit a shortwave signal from an earth-bound transmitter, it
gets "bounced" off the ionosphere to come back down to the listener a
few thousand miles away.

If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not
particularly useful.

--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:01:18 +0000, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:

When you transmit a shortwave signal from an earth-bound transmitter, it
gets "bounced" off the ionosphere to come back down to the listener a
few thousand miles away.

If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not
particularly useful.

Nonsense (at least above the MUF). Consider QSOs made using Mode K (21
MHz uplink, 29 MHz downlink) of the RS-10/11 and RS-12/13 ham satellites.

=====
RS-12 RADIO SPORT RS-12
Catalog number: 21089
Launched: February 5, 1991

Uplink: 21.210 to 21.250 MHz CW/USB Downlink: 29.410 to 29.450 MHz
CW/USB Beacon: 29.408 MHz
Robot: 29.454 MHz
[05232004]
=====

Snowbat wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:01:18 +0000, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:

When you transmit a shortwave signal from an earth-bound transmitter, it
gets "bounced" off the ionosphere to come back down to the listener a
few thousand miles away.

If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not
particularly useful.

Nonsense (at least above the MUF). Consider QSOs made using Mode K (21
MHz uplink, 29 MHz downlink) of the RS-10/11 and RS-12/13 ham satellites.

I recall listening to a satellite launched by China that played 'The East is
Red' as it came within range. Don't recall the frequency right off hand but
think it was up near 20 MHz or so. Perhaps someone else remembers it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

Snowbat wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:01:18 +0000, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:

When you transmit a shortwave signal from an earth-bound transmitter, it
gets "bounced" off the ionosphere to come back down to the listener a
few thousand miles away.

If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not
particularly useful.

Nonsense (at least above the MUF). Consider QSOs made using Mode K (21
MHz uplink, 29 MHz downlink) of the RS-10/11 and RS-12/13 ham satellites.

I recall listening to a satellite launched by China that played 'The East is
Red' as it came within range. Don't recall the frequency right off hand but
think it was up near 20 MHz or so. Perhaps someone else remembers it.

I did a quick Google and did find that that particular satellite was launched on
April 24, 1970 and used 20.009 Mhz to broadcast 'The East is Red'.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Mon, 16 May 2005 01:51:02 -0400, dxAce wrote:

I recall listening to a satellite launched by China that played 'The East is
Red' as it came within range. Don't recall the frequency right off hand but
think it was up near 20 MHz or so. Perhaps someone else remembers it.

CHINA-1 and CHINA-2 seem to fit your description:
http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/China12/China12.htm

Snowbat wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2005 01:51:02 -0400, dxAce wrote:

I recall listening to a satellite launched by China that played 'The East is
Red' as it came within range. Don't recall the frequency right off hand but
think it was up near 20 MHz or so. Perhaps someone else remembers it.

CHINA-1 and CHINA-2 seem to fit your description:
http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/histind/China12/China12.htm

I'll have to get a sound-card going again here as it would be a thrill to listen
to the recording they have up there on the site.

Almost as much of a thrill as it was to hear it live at the time I'll bet.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Snowbat wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:01:18 +0000, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not
particularly useful.

Nonsense (at least above the MUF). Consider QSOs made using Mode K (21
MHz uplink, 29 MHz downlink) of the RS-10/11 and RS-12/13 ham satellites.

I don't think that's what the OP was asking though.

Heck, we already make massive use of frequencies above the MUF for this
kind of service. Frequencies *way* above the MUF, as in above 1GHz.

Really, it would make little sense to use shortwave frequencies above
the MUF for routine service from space. The MUF changes -- a frequency
that won't bounce back into space today might bounce tomorrow. It makes
far more sense to select a frequency that's above the highest recorded E
and F-layer MUFs (i.e. at least 250MHz) and not have to worry about it.

(I wonder - but don't have the science to back it up - whether the MUF
might be considerably higher for transmissions originating in space?
Because they're striking the ionosphere at a shallower angle?)
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

Not necessarily. The planet Jupiter emits a signal that can be heard at
about 15 meter wavelength, about 21 mhz or so. That signal penetrates the
ionosphere pretty nicely. See
http://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/libra...discovery.html for more
info...

bill
KC9CS

"Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:
Wouldn't that provide a better coverage with less fading compared to
traditional approach? Or is it that shortwave needs ionosphere to
work at all? Thanks.

When you transmit a shortwave signal from an earth-bound transmitter, it
gets "bounced" off the ionosphere to come back down to the listener a few
thousand miles away.

If you were to transmit such a signal from space, it would bounce in
pretty much the same way -- except that instead of bouncing down to a
listener on Earth, it would bounce back out into space. Not particularly
useful.

--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com