RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Realistic DX-160 wanted... (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/72425-realistic-dx-160-wanted.html)

JLewis June 7th 05 08:25 PM

Realistic DX-160 wanted...
 
Looking for xlnt condition (must work 100%) DX-160...

Pic would be nice - as would matching speaker (DX-150) let me know condition
and shipped price (63116).

Thanks - it's appreciated...

John





Michael Lawson June 7th 05 09:13 PM


"JLewis" wrote in message
...
Looking for xlnt condition (must work 100%) DX-160...

Pic would be nice - as would matching speaker (DX-150) let me know

condition
and shipped price (63116).

Thanks - it's appreciated...


There are usually several on eBay at any given time. I'd
also check any local hamfests, since you never know what
you'll find.

--Mike L.



John S. June 7th 05 11:01 PM

Check Ebay, they are very common and many come with the speaker. Nice
little bandspread radio.


Arthur Pozner June 8th 05 01:36 AM

I may sound sarcastic,but why would anyone need a Realistic DX-160?
This radio has: poor frequency resolution (main dial+amateur band
bandspread only), single conversion (awful images every 910 KHz),
undescribibly low dynamic range (was probably OK in the 50's and 60's
), single 4 KHz mechanical (!!!) IF filter (surprise), substantial
drift,especially when used in CW/SSB mode...
May I suggest a Realistic/Allied SX-190, a MUCH,MUCH better designed
and built receiver. It might seem very strange.but both -160 and
-190 came from the same manufacturer.if not mistaken. Believe it was GRE
in Japan.


Unrevealed Source June 8th 05 02:51 AM

Perhaps he is looking for a full coverage receiver, which the SX-190 is not.

"Arthur Pozner" wrote in message
...
I may sound sarcastic,but why would anyone need a Realistic DX-160?
This radio has: poor frequency resolution (main dial+amateur band
bandspread only), single conversion (awful images every 910 KHz),
undescribibly low dynamic range (was probably OK in the 50's and 60's
), single 4 KHz mechanical (!!!) IF filter (surprise), substantial
drift,especially when used in CW/SSB mode...
May I suggest a Realistic/Allied SX-190, a MUCH,MUCH better designed
and built receiver. It might seem very strange.but both -160 and
-190 came from the same manufacturer.if not mistaken. Believe it was GRE
in Japan.




John S. June 8th 05 10:10 PM

Well sure offer away, but remember he did indicate specifically that he
was interested in the DX-160. The SX-190 is in my experienced
ovepriced on the secondhand market for what it is.

The DX-160 and all it's brethren are more reasonably priced, have more
complete coverage and are pretty decent performers for the money.
Indeed I found an old Popular Electronics that reviewed the 150B and
found it to be quite a performer (by 1970 standards) for the money. My
150B that I picked up at an estate sale complete with original speaker
for $10.00 would hear a lot of stations, and I though it looked pretty
neat as well.


Rob Mills June 9th 05 03:21 AM


"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...

My150B that I picked up at an estate sale complete with original
speaker

for $10.00

Guess I took, I paid $10 for my 160 with no speaker. Actually, they thought
it didn't work, the switch in the headphone jack had filmed over and
wouldn't allow the speaker to work. RM~



Arthur Pozner June 11th 05 09:56 PM

OK, it is worth $10.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com