![]() |
"Jim Douglas" wrote:
Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message ... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. -- Eric F. Richards "The weird part is that I can feel productive even when I'm doomed." - Dilbert |
Eric F. Richards wrote:
"Jim Douglas" wrote: Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message ... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. There's also the fact that much of what shortwave was several years ago is now much different. With more major broadcasters removing themselves by degrees, or in total from HF in favor of Internet, podcasts, satellite radio, or any and all. And service by the majors to North America being all but abandoned. Though there's still a good deal of content, and some of it quite interesting, many of the staples have given way to US religious broadcasters which are of less interest to the serious DXers here, resulting in attrition from the bands, and from the newsgroup as well. World tensions and shifting political sands do create a need for SW in many regions of the world, but as David posted here recently, SW is not a primary, or even secondary medium for much of the world. This, too, results in changes, often sudden and dramatic, in usage of the bands, and subsequently the usage of this newsgroup. Hard truth is that SW was at one time, a significant medium for Europe. And for Europeans living abroad, it was often the only source of news from home. For many governments, SW was the most cost effective medium for widely distributing propaganda, news, culture and popular entertainment. Local media, as it was instituted quickly displaced SW in the public attention. Outside of European culture, SW has been a novelty for the rest of us. If that. This situation is not showing any signs of reversal. Meaning, in the end, this newsgroup will be comprised of enthusiasts, and hobbycraft participants. As newsgroup history has demonstrated over the last 10 years, not every SW enthusiast remains an enthusiast. Atrition will reduce the numbers as people entering the hobby anew will be, because there is little or no active widespread promotion of SW listening, fewer than those exiting. While flamers have no doubt run off some of the players here, and some of the serious players have gone into lurking mode, the changing nature of SW itself is responsible for the loss of regulars here. |
In article
, Peter Maus wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote: "Jim Douglas" wrote: Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message ... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. There's also the fact that much of what shortwave was several years ago is now much different. With more major broadcasters removing themselves by degrees, or in total from HF in favor of Internet, podcasts, satellite radio, or any and all. And service by the majors to North America being all but abandoned. Though there's still a good deal of content, and some of it quite interesting, many of the staples have given way to US religious broadcasters which are of less interest to the serious DXers here, resulting in attrition from the bands, and from the newsgroup as well. World tensions and shifting political sands do create a need for SW in many regions of the world, but as David posted here recently, SW is not a primary, or even secondary medium for much of the world. This, too, results in changes, often sudden and dramatic, in usage of the bands, and subsequently the usage of this newsgroup. Hard truth is that SW was at one time, a significant medium for Europe. And for Europeans living abroad, it was often the only source of news from home. For many governments, SW was the most cost effective medium for widely distributing propaganda, news, culture and popular entertainment. Local media, as it was instituted quickly displaced SW in the public attention. Outside of European culture, SW has been a novelty for the rest of us. If that. This situation is not showing any signs of reversal. Meaning, in the end, this newsgroup will be comprised of enthusiasts, and hobbycraft participants. As newsgroup history has demonstrated over the last 10 years, not every SW enthusiast remains an enthusiast. Atrition will reduce the numbers as people entering the hobby anew will be, because there is little or no active widespread promotion of SW listening, fewer than those exiting. While flamers have no doubt run off some of the players here, and some of the serious players have gone into lurking mode, the changing nature of SW itself is responsible for the loss of regulars here. Don't worry Peter we will be in another war soon and SW will pick up. Iran, North Korea, China... the possibilities for trouble are endless. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote:
In article , Peter Maus wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote: "Jim Douglas" wrote: Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message ... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. There's also the fact that much of what shortwave was several years ago is now much different. With more major broadcasters removing themselves by degrees, or in total from HF in favor of Internet, podcasts, satellite radio, or any and all. And service by the majors to North America being all but abandoned. Though there's still a good deal of content, and some of it quite interesting, many of the staples have given way to US religious broadcasters which are of less interest to the serious DXers here, resulting in attrition from the bands, and from the newsgroup as well. World tensions and shifting political sands do create a need for SW in many regions of the world, but as David posted here recently, SW is not a primary, or even secondary medium for much of the world. This, too, results in changes, often sudden and dramatic, in usage of the bands, and subsequently the usage of this newsgroup. Hard truth is that SW was at one time, a significant medium for Europe. And for Europeans living abroad, it was often the only source of news from home. For many governments, SW was the most cost effective medium for widely distributing propaganda, news, culture and popular entertainment. Local media, as it was instituted quickly displaced SW in the public attention. Outside of European culture, SW has been a novelty for the rest of us. If that. This situation is not showing any signs of reversal. Meaning, in the end, this newsgroup will be comprised of enthusiasts, and hobbycraft participants. As newsgroup history has demonstrated over the last 10 years, not every SW enthusiast remains an enthusiast. Atrition will reduce the numbers as people entering the hobby anew will be, because there is little or no active widespread promotion of SW listening, fewer than those exiting. While flamers have no doubt run off some of the players here, and some of the serious players have gone into lurking mode, the changing nature of SW itself is responsible for the loss of regulars here. Don't worry Peter we will be in another war soon and SW will pick up. Iran, North Korea, China... the possibilities for trouble are endless. Yeah, the pucker factor is high lately, isn't it. |
I agree with most of these observations. The gist seems to be that
shortwave is becoming more and more marginalized. This in itself is nothing new. Shortwave has been a marginal medium for decades now. It's marginalization is also, in my opinion, one of its strengths. What attracts many people to the shortwave bands is precisely the possibility of hearing something different, something besides the standard crap you hear on FM, broadcast AM, etc. Yes, the big broadcasters appear to be abandoning shortwave, but (1) there's *plenty* to listen to on shortwave besides the big broadcasters and (2) it's not yet clear how the big boys' retreat from shortwave is going to play out. Swiss Radio International and RVI both abandoned shortwave broadcasts some time ago in favor of the internet. You may have listened to these broadcasters regularly, but have you visited their websites since they left the airwaves? Me neither. Steve |
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , Peter Maus wrote: Eric F. Richards wrote: "Jim Douglas" wrote: Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message digy.com ... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. There's also the fact that much of what shortwave was several years ago is now much different. With more major broadcasters removing themselves by degrees, or in total from HF in favor of Internet, podcasts, satellite radio, or any and all. And service by the majors to North America being all but abandoned. Though there's still a good deal of content, and some of it quite interesting, many of the staples have given way to US religious broadcasters which are of less interest to the serious DXers here, resulting in attrition from the bands, and from the newsgroup as well. World tensions and shifting political sands do create a need for SW in many regions of the world, but as David posted here recently, SW is not a primary, or even secondary medium for much of the world. This, too, results in changes, often sudden and dramatic, in usage of the bands, and subsequently the usage of this newsgroup. Hard truth is that SW was at one time, a significant medium for Europe. And for Europeans living abroad, it was often the only source of news from home. For many governments, SW was the most cost effective medium for widely distributing propaganda, news, culture and popular entertainment. Local media, as it was instituted quickly displaced SW in the public attention. Outside of European culture, SW has been a novelty for the rest of us. If that. This situation is not showing any signs of reversal. Meaning, in the end, this newsgroup will be comprised of enthusiasts, and hobbycraft participants. As newsgroup history has demonstrated over the last 10 years, not every SW enthusiast remains an enthusiast. Atrition will reduce the numbers as people entering the hobby anew will be, because there is little or no active widespread promotion of SW listening, fewer than those exiting. While flamers have no doubt run off some of the players here, and some of the serious players have gone into lurking mode, the changing nature of SW itself is responsible for the loss of regulars here. Don't worry Peter we will be in another war soon and SW will pick up. Iran, North Korea, China... the possibilities for trouble are endless. Heck, we don't even have to be involved, either. Pakistan and India are one accident away from making a lot of offshoring look like a bad idea, and all it takes to ignite things in much of the globe is the traditional assassin's bullet. --Mike L. |
"Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Eric F. Richards wrote: "Jim Douglas" wrote: Holy crap batman I only get 5-10 posts total daily, WTF, I am using COMCAST, anyone else using COMCAST and getting dribbles? "Telamon" wrote in message digy.com... My news server must be on the fritz only 8 posts for today? This is a 100 to 300 posts a day news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California I'm not seeing much traffic any more at this point, either. I figured the flamers (yes, I've done it, too) have driven the serious posters away. Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. Peter, you should post more often. It's always good to see a voice from the past. There's also the fact that much of what shortwave was several years ago is now much different. With more major broadcasters removing themselves by degrees, or in total from HF in favor of Internet, podcasts, satellite radio, or any and all. And service by the majors to North America being all but abandoned. Though there's still a good deal of content, and some of it quite interesting, many of the staples have given way to US religious broadcasters which are of less interest to the serious DXers here, resulting in attrition from the bands, and from the newsgroup as well. As I've said in the past, it all depends on what the major broadcasters are trying to accomplish. If the idea is to broadcast primarily to expatriates, then you can use the more advanced forms of communication as the expatriates will be willing to look them up. If the idea is to broadcast views to the broadest possible audience, then SW should remain as part of the solution, as it reaches more people with less cost requirements than other solutions. World tensions and shifting political sands do create a need for SW in many regions of the world, but as David posted here recently, SW is not a primary, or even secondary medium for much of the world. This, too, results in changes, often sudden and dramatic, in usage of the bands, and subsequently the usage of this newsgroup. Hard truth is that SW was at one time, a significant medium for Europe. And for Europeans living abroad, it was often the only source of news from home. For many governments, SW was the most cost effective medium for widely distributing propaganda, news, culture and popular entertainment. Local media, as it was instituted quickly displaced SW in the public attention. Outside of European culture, SW has been a novelty for the rest of us. If that. This situation is not showing any signs of reversal. There are other factors, such as energy costs and governmental priorities, that drive decisions on SW broadcasting as well. If you look at SW broadcasting as far as ratings are concerned, you're probably going to be hard pressed to find any good consistent Nielsen rating-esque method of finding out listenership. It's easier to say, "XXX website has XXX hits", and be able to draw conclusions, or also perform the same service as the Nielsen Netratings, so there is data for policymaking. SW listenership is a bit more nebulous, so it's a bit harder to ascertain. That makes it also more difficult to defend when the people who make the decisions are used to a corporate-style cost benefit analysis. Meaning, in the end, this newsgroup will be comprised of enthusiasts, and hobbycraft participants. As newsgroup history has demonstrated over the last 10 years, not every SW enthusiast remains an enthusiast. Atrition will reduce the numbers as people entering the hobby anew will be, because there is little or no active widespread promotion of SW listening, fewer than those exiting. While flamers have no doubt run off some of the players here, and some of the serious players have gone into lurking mode, the changing nature of SW itself is responsible for the loss of regulars here. One other item to note is that the real world will often intrude. There was a period of several years where I didn't touch SW at all, because of the time factor. I'm also sure that later on in life, as the kids become more active with evening events like sports, scouts and whatnot, my free time for SW will decline again. Still later, when they are all teens, I'm sure that the free time will start to go back up, and my availability for SW listening with it. This is the same item that you see in the boardgame community: when the old Atari and Intellivision came out, there was a dropoff in boardgame usage. That dropoff has become heightened over the years as the video games replaced board games as the primary game of choice of kids. However, there is still a subset of people who still play boardgames, and there is a cottage industry of companies that have since sprung up to cater to that group that looks for things other than the latest Monopoly variant. --Mike L. |
Peter Maus wrote:
Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. Good to see you posting, Peter. Here's an on-topic sort of thing to ask you: Do you expec the disappearance of most -- if not all -- tabletops from the SW market to be permanent? After all, it is the broadcasters who are cutting back on SW use, not as much the utes, and the tabletop radio isn't necessarily the first choice for a broadcaster. Certainly the portable isn't the first choice for a ute listener. Regards, -- Eric F. Richards "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass, often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 |
Eric F. Richards wrote:
Peter Maus wrote: Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. Good to see you posting, Peter. Thanks. Here's an on-topic sort of thing to ask you: Do you expec the disappearance of most -- if not all -- tabletops from the SW market to be permanent? Unless there is a demand, yes. With SW broadcasters cutting back, manufacturers are looking at the worldwide demand for receivers falling steadily. Let's face it, most of us here, as enthusiastic as we are, don't need hardware that tops a kilobuck for our hobbycraft. You buy heavy. I buy heavy. Steve Lare buys heavy. But read the posts of users here...they're not dropping cash topping a kilobuck on a receiver. And many were drawn into the hobby to listen to the BBC, when signals were plentiful and reception quality was near local. As BBC and DW have exited the North American market, the dilletantes, of which there are many, lost interest. As broadcaster after broadcaster exits the market, more program listeners exit with them. Some move to satellite radio. Most simply exit the hobby. Lost interest, means an upgraded receiver not sold. Now, the hardcores here, will be scoring utes and transatlantic aircraft, smaller broadcasters and harder to capture signals from overseas, but that's not easy. And the majority of SW participants aren't going to spend that kind of time and effort to pick up noisy, fading signals. You will. I will. Lare will. Maghakian will. And we'll all use heavy hardware to do it. But that's four that I can think of in a swipe of the cortex. There was a time I could point to four times that many without taking a breath. Times have changed. In the 10 years I've been playing in this newsgroup alone. I barely recognize the bands from the time I first got into SW 50 years ago. And most don't know that they can, despite what the HOA says, put up an external antenna. They don't want a confrontation, even if they're right, and they don't want a bullseye painted on their back with the community. Intimidation keeps a LOT of people, who would otherwise play harder with SW, from doing so. So, there's diminishing activity and diminishing interest. There's also a LOT more noise. It's gotten so difficult to score a clean signal where I am, I can barely hear WLS sometimes. And my installation is no slouch job. Who but the hardcores are going to put up with that? And spend heavy cash to do it? Few. To be sure. So, sales of serious receivers are down. Toys and gimmicks are up. SW is seen as a gimmick, almost afterthought, to receiver manufacture. It goes into portables more designed for the beach than the shack. Along with more digital crap, that unless executed well, produces more noise than the signals being sought. And always bear in mind, that in the US, shortwave has never been a part of daily life as it was in Europe. It's virtually always been a matter of hobbycraft here. And it's even seen dramatic diminution in Europe, where it was among the most important sources of broadcast content. When, Mark "Don't-Try-To-Confuse-Me-With-Facts Byford" decided to shut off North American streams, and let he and his school tie wearing buddies pocket the budget savings, he was totally misinformed about the size of the WorldService listening audience in the US. He believed that the numbers favored FM and internet. He was staggeringly full of ****. But then, he wasn't really interested in reaching the SW listening crowd, because we didn't fit the socio-economic targets he found desirable. He's not alone in that assessment of SW listeners. Broadcasters worldwide, as well as hardware manufactures all look at the numbers. And most decide we're not a market worth serving. US is among the biggest and most voracious markets in the world (China is now giving us a run for our money) and if there's limited market need, here, most manufacturers are not interested in producing a product to fill it. Manufacturers are in the business of providing commodities these days. The days of the passionate manufacturer serving the hobby by producing specialized toys are all but over. Hallicrafters couldn' survive today, even with their products made in Japan and China. Hammarlund couldn't survive today. There's a reason why Drake isn't making SW desktops, either. MBA driven boardrooms are no longer interested in producing products for boutique buyers. Ten Tec still makes receivers, but the bulk of their money comes from government contracts and their sheetmetal fabricating business. There's a budget to serve the hobby. But it's limited. And products are pricey. Good products, no doubt, but very pricey. Even Icom is out of the SW business. They produced huge goverment and commercial contractors. Hobbycraft had limited access to these products, but even commercial contractors are getting out of HF, and amateur numbers, where the last passion for HF exists, are dwindling. Even dedicated amateur suppliers are turning attention away from HF. No manufacturer is going to enter the market with a product that's saleproof. And for most manufacturers today, it's not about a product, a service, or serving a niche, it's about numbers. And they have to be large numbers to make it worth the effort to being servicing needs. So, yes, I expect the absence of affordable performance desktops to be permanent. After all, it is the broadcasters who are cutting back on SW use, not as much the utes, and the tabletop radio isn't necessarily the first choice for a broadcaster. Certainly the portable isn't the first choice for a ute listener. You're right. But then, hard truth is that they don't care. |
"Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Eric F. Richards wrote: Peter Maus wrote: Sometimes the serious participants simply go into lurking mode. I've been with the group for about a decade, now, but have fallen into lurking mode, because much of what comes up is the same stuff that came up when I first joined the group. Lots of beginners' questions, and a good deal of rehash of common problems. Most of the gratuitous flamers have exited after becoming bored. Those that remain become more topical, less bellicose. So, it's not that the serious players have left, they're just waiting to participate in a discussion that they've not already been involved in. Good to see you posting, Peter. Thanks. Here's an on-topic sort of thing to ask you: Do you expec the disappearance of most -- if not all -- tabletops from the SW market to be permanent? Unless there is a demand, yes. With SW broadcasters cutting back, manufacturers are looking at the worldwide demand for receivers falling steadily. Let's face it, most of us here, as enthusiastic as we are, don't need hardware that tops a kilobuck for our hobbycraft. You buy heavy. I buy heavy. Steve Lare buys heavy. But read the posts of users here...they're not dropping cash topping a kilobuck on a receiver. And many were drawn into the hobby to listen to the BBC, when signals were plentiful and reception quality was near local. As BBC and DW have exited the North American market, the dilletantes, of which there are many, lost interest. As broadcaster after broadcaster exits the market, more program listeners exit with them. Some move to satellite radio. Most simply exit the hobby. Lost interest, means an upgraded receiver not sold. Now, the hardcores here, will be scoring utes and transatlantic aircraft, smaller broadcasters and harder to capture signals from overseas, but that's not easy. And the majority of SW participants aren't going to spend that kind of time and effort to pick up noisy, fading signals. You will. I will. Lare will. Maghakian will. And we'll all use heavy hardware to do it. Another problem is the issue of priorities. With the exception of the SX-100 that I scored at Dayton, I've not bought a radio for the shack since the Satellit 800 back in 2000. I'd love to grab an R-5000, IC-R71A, R8, R8A or R8B, but the money needs to go elsewhere right now. My other hobbies suffer accordingly, but unless I want to end up owing an arm and a leg to the credit agencies, I have to cut back and reprioritize. But that's four that I can think of in a swipe of the cortex. There was a time I could point to four times that many without taking a breath. Times have changed. In the 10 years I've been playing in this newsgroup alone. I barely recognize the bands from the time I first got into SW 50 years ago. And most don't know that they can, despite what the HOA says, put up an external antenna. They don't want a confrontation, even if they're right, and they don't want a bullseye painted on their back with the community. Intimidation keeps a LOT of people, who would otherwise play harder with SW, from doing so. Heh. I just found out last week that the neighbors thought I was putting up a clothesline last fall when I put up my 50' random wire. I figured that the height of it (10+' off the ground) would have been a hint that it wasn't a clothesline, but then again... So, there's diminishing activity and diminishing interest. There's also a LOT more noise. It's gotten so difficult to score a clean signal where I am, I can barely hear WLS sometimes. And my installation is no slouch job. Yes, I've noticed as summer came on, when people started switching on the pool equipment, the lights, and other outdoor items that the noise level skyrocketed. I'm starting to think that a loop like a Wellbrook isn't a bad idea after all, especially when next year we'll be planting a swamp white oak in the path of the random wire, and the random wire will have to come down. Who but the hardcores are going to put up with that? And spend heavy cash to do it? Few. To be sure. So, sales of serious receivers are down. Toys and gimmicks are up. SW is seen as a gimmick, almost afterthought, to receiver manufacture. It goes into portables more designed for the beach than the shack. Along with more digital crap, that unless executed well, produces more noise than the signals being sought. And always bear in mind, that in the US, shortwave has never been a part of daily life as it was in Europe. It's virtually always been a matter of hobbycraft here. And it's even seen dramatic diminution in Europe, where it was among the most important sources of broadcast content. When, Mark "Don't-Try-To-Confuse-Me-With-Facts Byford" decided to shut off North American streams, and let he and his school tie wearing buddies pocket the budget savings, he was totally misinformed about the size of the WorldService listening audience in the US. He believed that the numbers favored FM and internet. He was staggeringly full of ****. But then, he wasn't really interested in reaching the SW listening crowd, because we didn't fit the socio-economic targets he found desirable. He's not alone in that assessment of SW listeners. Broadcasters worldwide, as well as hardware manufactures all look at the numbers. And most decide we're not a market worth serving. US is among the biggest and most voracious markets in the world (China is now giving us a run for our money) and if there's limited market need, here, most manufacturers are not interested in producing a product to fill it. The problem here is that it's essentially understood that it requires a certain financial commitment to undertake a manufacturing job. I think that the SW business can be done, but not on anything approaching the scale of what was done before. More like Wellbrook sized operations, I believe. Manufacturers are in the business of providing commodities these days. The days of the passionate manufacturer serving the hobby by producing specialized toys are all but over. Hallicrafters couldn' survive today, even with their products made in Japan and China. Hammarlund couldn't survive today. There's a reason why Drake isn't making SW desktops, either. MBA driven boardrooms are no longer interested in producing products for boutique buyers. Ten Tec still makes receivers, but the bulk of their money comes from government contracts and their sheetmetal fabricating business. There's a budget to serve the hobby. But it's limited. And products are pricey. Good products, no doubt, but very pricey. I think that there is a business for SW, but it will have to be served by small companies. Small as in itty-bitty. The audiophile companies haven't been put out of business by the changing times with everyone and their grandmother wanting home theaters, and the catering of the few boutique makers to the obsessed has continued. Even Icom is out of the SW business. They produced huge goverment and commercial contractors. Hobbycraft had limited access to these products, but even commercial contractors are getting out of HF, and amateur numbers, where the last passion for HF exists, are dwindling. Even dedicated amateur suppliers are turning attention away from HF. No manufacturer is going to enter the market with a product that's saleproof. And for most manufacturers today, it's not about a product, a service, or serving a niche, it's about numbers. And they have to be large numbers to make it worth the effort to being servicing needs. So, yes, I expect the absence of affordable performance desktops to be permanent. I will wait and see; things might change once boomers retire and have a lot of money and time on their hands. --Mike L. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com