![]() |
No Live 8 broadcast?
Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here.
Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! |
"Hatfield" wrote in message oups.com... Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! Not sure I understand your comments. Are you talking about Live8? I watched some of it on VH1 and MTV. |
"Hatfield" wrote in message oups.com... Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! Mr. H. Field, Where is "over here"? It was on TV in New Zealand. Don't know that it was on shortwave though. Mark. Auckland New Zealand. |
On 3 Jul 2005 23:21:56 -0700, "Hatfield"
wrote: Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! AOL streamed it live and are now streaming repeats at aol dot communist. |
David wrote:
On 3 Jul 2005 23:21:56 -0700, "Hatfield" wrote: Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! AOL streamed it live and are now streaming repeats at aol dot communist. It was also streamed live on at least 8 channels of XM. |
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:50:24 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: David wrote: On 3 Jul 2005 23:21:56 -0700, "Hatfield" wrote: Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! AOL streamed it live and are now streaming repeats at aol dot communist. It was also streamed live on at least 8 channels of XM. XM has no pictures. |
David wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:50:24 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: David wrote: On 3 Jul 2005 23:21:56 -0700, "Hatfield" wrote: Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! AOL streamed it live and are now streaming repeats at aol dot communist. It was also streamed live on at least 8 channels of XM. XM has no pictures. That's the beauty of XM. At least here in the Windy, the concert was also broadcast on ABC. for a number of hours. Big bright pictures and all. |
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:13:40 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: At least here in the Windy, the concert was also broadcast on ABC. for a number of hours. Big bright pictures and all. 2 hours of Disney sanitized highlights. Oh joy. |
David wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:13:40 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: At least here in the Windy, the concert was also broadcast on ABC. for a number of hours. Big bright pictures and all. 2 hours of Disney sanitized highlights. Oh joy. You're never happy with much of anything are you, 'tard boy? Continue to tote, and have a nice 4th of July. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
David wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:13:40 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: At least here in the Windy, the concert was also broadcast on ABC. for a number of hours. Big bright pictures and all. 2 hours of Disney sanitized highlights. Oh joy. Interesting. I comment that it was on ABC in Chicago for a number of hours and you respond with 2 hours of highlights. DISNEY sanitized highlights. Referring to a post of this past week, I understand why so many people come to this group, participate for a while, and then leave. Your protestations notwithstanding, the show WAS available widely throughout this country through multiple sources, whether domestically originated or not, it WAS widely available. Perhaps not on SW. But then the pictures on SW are so poor these days. :) One colleague told me he found it on PBS, though. No Disney there. |
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:58:59 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: David wrote: On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:13:40 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: At least here in the Windy, the concert was also broadcast on ABC. for a number of hours. Big bright pictures and all. 2 hours of Disney sanitized highlights. Oh joy. Interesting. I comment that it was on ABC in Chicago for a number of hours and you respond with 2 hours of highlights. DISNEY sanitized highlights. Referring to a post of this past week, I understand why so many people come to this group, participate for a while, and then leave. Your protestations notwithstanding, the show WAS available widely throughout this country through multiple sources, whether domestically originated or not, it WAS widely available. Perhaps not on SW. But then the pictures on SW are so poor these days. :) One colleague told me he found it on PBS, though. No Disney there. |
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:58:59 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Your protestations notwithstanding, the show WAS available widely throughout this country through multiple sources, whether domestically originated or not, it WAS widely available. Perhaps not on SW. But then the pictures on SW are so poor these days. :) One colleague told me he found it on PBS, though. No Disney there. That's all just lovely. I love you too. AOL had 5 or 6 simultaneous streams available. CSPAN style, no commentary. 320 Kb second, full screen zoomable. It's still playing replays. Free of charge. Right now. http://music.channel.aol.com/live_8_...ive_now_london |
David wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:58:59 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Your protestations notwithstanding, the show WAS available widely throughout this country through multiple sources, whether domestically originated or not, it WAS widely available. Perhaps not on SW. But then the pictures on SW are so poor these days. :) One colleague told me he found it on PBS, though. No Disney there. That's all just lovely. I love you too. AOL had 5 or 6 simultaneous streams available. CSPAN style, no commentary. 320 Kb second, full screen zoomable. It's still playing replays. Free of charge. Right now. http://music.channel.aol.com/live_8_...ive_now_london Then we agree, it was/is widely available, and there are no complaints. :::and quiet that "I love you" stuff. I thought you didn't want anyone to know. Geez. Oh, and did the "condition" ever clear up? It still stings when I pee.:::: |
D Peter Maus wrote:
:::and quiet that "I love you" stuff. I thought you didn't want anyone to know. Geez. Oh, and did the "condition" ever clear up? It still stings when I pee.:::: Many years ago, I trained Bees to do just that. They were conditioned to sting the male appendage whenever it was made available for urination. I had visions of great wealth being made with this 'organic' enlargement/enhancement process. Well, somehow, unbeknownst to me, a strain of African killer bees made it into my trained hive. During the last stage of testing before the public offerings were to be made, disaster struck. I proceeded through the motions of aiming the research object and the bees came. It's impossible to describe the horror. On recovering consciousness, I found I was so swollen I couldn't pull my pants up or go through a doorway sideways. I had to cover my deformity until all the brand new groupies disappeared. It took the better part of a fortnight, but they drifted off. The grapevine has it they migrated over the Ace's house. They heard he's a huge one ALL the time and not just above the shoulders. mike |
m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: :::and quiet that "I love you" stuff. I thought you didn't want anyone to know. Geez. Oh, and did the "condition" ever clear up? It still stings when I pee.:::: Many years ago, I trained Bees to do just that. They were conditioned to sting the male appendage whenever it was made available for urination. I had visions of great wealth being made with this 'organic' enlargement/enhancement process. Well, somehow, unbeknownst to me, a strain of African killer bees made it into my trained hive. During the last stage of testing before the public offerings were to be made, disaster struck. I proceeded through the motions of aiming the research object and the bees came. It's impossible to describe the horror. On recovering consciousness, I found I was so swollen I couldn't pull my pants up or go through a doorway sideways. I had to cover my deformity until all the brand new groupies disappeared. It took the better part of a fortnight, but they drifted off. The grapevine has it they migrated over the Ace's house. They heard he's a huge one ALL the time and not just above the shoulders. mike I'll have what he's having. TWO olives. |
Peter Maus wrote:
I'll have what he's having. TWO olives. Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? mike |
m II wrote:
Peter Maus wrote: I'll have what he's having. TWO olives. Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? mike Which one? |
Peter Maus wrote:
Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? Which one? Life is goodg I was thinking of the 750/5 (or was it/2?). I've been toying with an an idea of a hybrid using a VW motor. I just picked up a four speed transmission on eBay to go with the assorted bits and pieces I already have. An adapter plate would have to be made once I get the VW crankcases and crankshaft together. Something along the lines of: http://w6rec.com/duane/bmw/BMW-VW/ 1600 cc should give lots of torque. mike |
m II wrote:
Peter Maus wrote: Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? Which one? Life is goodg Could suck worse. Still riding the '90 K-LT, sold most everything else about 5 months ago, and picked up a '72 R60/5. Needs some attention, but then so do I. I was thinking of the 750/5 (or was it/2?). I've been toying with an an idea of a hybrid using a VW motor. I just picked up a four speed transmission on eBay to go with the assorted bits and pieces I already have. An adapter plate would have to be made once I get the VW crankcases and crankshaft together. That's a whole lot of fabricating going on. Something along the lines of: http://w6rec.com/duane/bmw/BMW-VW/ 1600 cc should give lots of torque. Have you ridden the Rocket III by Triumph? 2300cc's, 6 cylinders. You wanna talk about torque? And smooth as barber shaved glass. Faster and quieter than my BMW. It's not a light bike, but handles like a bike half it's weight. I got one from Marty in South Heights for an afternoon. Damn! I had a Ferrari that didn't pull that hard. But a VW 1600 seems like more weight than you'd need in a frame that small. Although the low C/M would make for more nimble handling than you'd expect, stopping would be a bit of a challenge. But the mandatory newsgroup question would have to be, what kind of radio you going to put on it? I pulled the factory radio on mine, last year, and dropped my Becker Mexico in the hole. Light preamp for the whip and I was listening to shortwave on the road. The factory radio is back in the hole,though. I'm using the Becker in my mini van. |
Peter Maus wrote:
Life is goodg Could suck worse. Still riding the '90 K-LT, sold most everything else about 5 months ago, and picked up a '72 R60/5. Needs some attention, but then so do I. I hope things work out well and not suck at all. That's a whole lot of fabricating going on. Yes. Things are always easier when not actually doing the work yet. Have you ridden the Rocket III by Triumph? 2300cc's, 6 cylinders. You wanna talk about torque? And smooth as barber shaved glass. Faster and quieter than my BMW. It's not a light bike, but handles like a bike half it's weight. I got one from Marty in South Heights for an afternoon. Damn! I had a Ferrari that didn't pull that hard. Being in Canada, we only get the *three* cylinder 2300. I've seen it, but found it repulsive, if not downright ugly. Suzuki's Madura of a few years ago stunk too. I I were to get a new bike today, it would be a plain Ducati 1000s Monster. Unfortunate name, but wonderful bike. But a VW 1600 seems like more weight than you'd need in a frame that small. Although the low C/M would make for more nimble handling than you'd expect, stopping would be a bit of a challenge. I don't need as much in the way of brakes as I did twenty or thirty years ago g But the mandatory newsgroup question would have to be, what kind of radio you going to put on it? I pulled the factory radio on mine, last year, and dropped my Becker Mexico in the hole. Light preamp for the whip and I was listening to shortwave on the road. The factory radio is back in the hole,though. I'm using the Becker in my mini van. I wander around the wreckers two or three times a year, checking out the old German cars for anything with a shortwave banded radio. No luck yet. They said they'd keep their eyes open for me. A nice Blaupunk would be a welcome addition. |
m II wrote:
Being in Canada, we only get the *three* cylinder 2300. I've seen it, but found it repulsive, if not downright ugly. Suzuki's Madura of a few years ago stunk too. I I were to get a new bike today, it would be a plain Ducati 1000s Monster. Unfortunate name, but wonderful bike. Checking the paperwork, yes, you're right, it IS a three. I must be confusing that with the Valkyrie I rode most of that week. Also didn't suck. But a VW 1600 seems like more weight than you'd need in a frame that small. Although the low C/M would make for more nimble handling than you'd expect, stopping would be a bit of a challenge. I don't need as much in the way of brakes as I did twenty or thirty years ago g Largely true of most of us. But the mandatory newsgroup question would have to be, what kind of radio you going to put on it? I pulled the factory radio on mine, last year, and dropped my Becker Mexico in the hole. Light preamp for the whip and I was listening to shortwave on the road. The factory radio is back in the hole,though. I'm using the Becker in my mini van. I wander around the wreckers two or three times a year, checking out the old German cars for anything with a shortwave banded radio. No luck yet. They said they'd keep their eyes open for me. A nice Blaupunk would be a welcome addition. Mot many of those floating around loose. Good luck. |
DaviD - so... 'you' get the picture ~ RHF
. . . . . |
Hatfield wrote:
Thank you BBC TV, but too bad U.S. could not copy you all over here. Disappointing. Folks were paying 500 pounds per ticket, but no concert on American TV, nor SW neither, ratings would have been tremendous! I listened to it on XM radio. Each city was on a different XM channel. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
Peter Maus wrote:
m II wrote: Peter Maus wrote: I'll have what he's having. TWO olives. Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? mike Which one? Aww that was cruel Peter! Nice to hear from you! -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
Brian Denley wrote:
Peter Maus wrote: m II wrote: Peter Maus wrote: I'll have what he's having. TWO olives. Nice to see you, Peter. How's the BMW? mike Which one? Aww that was cruel Peter! Nice to hear from you! And you. And that SW=8 is still burning along. Even dragged it to the North Woods for some very nice listening by the lake. |
Peter Maus wrote:
And you. And that SW=8 is still burning along. Even dragged it to the North Woods for some very nice listening by the lake. Good to hear Peter! I have been trying my hand at writing a control program for my M-7000 decoder. It works pretty well! Something to do while waiting for SWL conditions to improve. Hope you are well. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com