RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   U.S. Citizens Targeted for $Trillion$ U.N. Taxation Plan (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/74247-u-s-citizens-targeted-%24trillion%24-u-n-taxation-plan.html)

BagLady July 9th 05 02:26 AM

U.S. Citizens Targeted for $Trillion$ U.N. Taxation Plan
 
Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America’s Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women’s conference and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children’s rights and women’s rights in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive once
again.

A: She has. That’s the central focus of her public relations campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into the
family.

Q: She’s been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women. Isn’t she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That’s very basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml



running dogg July 9th 05 03:44 AM

The accompanying article doesn't seem to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all, but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America’s Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women’s conference and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children’s rights and women’s rights in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive once
again.

A: She has. That’s the central focus of her public relations campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into the
family.

Q: She’s been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women. Isn’t she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That’s very basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Brian Denley July 9th 05 04:16 AM

Powerful women scare the sh*t out of the right. They like 'em barefoot and
pregnant.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html



Li`Changchun July 9th 05 03:00 PM


"running dogg" wrote The accompanying article doesn't seem
to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all,


Here lil boy let me hold your hand
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/smkgun.pdf

Perhaps your rant below simply reveals that you find Marxist-Socialist
idealogy to be compatible with your "personal" view. Perhaps that "personal
hatred" that you seem to perceive is a reflection of your "personal hatred"
for conservatives.
I have found little evidence that shows Hilary Clintoon is nothing but a
Marxist-Socialist. In which case, yes I have a "personal hatred" towards
her. Just as so many of the Millions of families whose relatives were
murdered by hineous leaders with that oh so famous "personal charisma" of
Marxism-Socialism.

but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens

Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and

Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary

Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington

attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in

the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America's Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in

Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her

ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more

government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the

global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active

in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human

rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That

is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women's conference

and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was

going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children's rights and women's rights

in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive

once
again.

A: She has. That's the central focus of her public relations

campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with

women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into

the
family.

Q: She's been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of

the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of

Discrimination
against Women. Isn't she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the

future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and

social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task

than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That's very

basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+

Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

=----



Eric F. Richards July 9th 05 04:11 PM

"BagLady" wrote:


Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in the
United States Senate.


Barbara Olson died on September 11, 2001 aboard the plane that crashed
into the Pentagon.

Your credibility is shot. Maybe you and Rickets ought to get together
for a name-calling contest.


[email protected] July 9th 05 04:39 PM

That is what I was going to say too,Eric,but you said it first.Barbara
Olson did die in that Airplane crash.
cuhulin


running dogg July 9th 05 10:47 PM

Li`Changchun wrote:


"running dogg" wrote The accompanying article doesn't seem
to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all,


Here lil boy let me hold your hand
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/smkgun.pdf

Perhaps your rant below simply reveals that you find Marxist-Socialist
idealogy to be compatible with your "personal" view. Perhaps that "personal
hatred" that you seem to perceive is a reflection of your "personal hatred"
for conservatives.
I have found little evidence that shows Hilary Clintoon is nothing but a
Marxist-Socialist. In which case, yes I have a "personal hatred" towards
her. Just as so many of the Millions of families whose relatives were
murdered by hineous leaders with that oh so famous "personal charisma" of
Marxism-Socialism.


Hillary may be a commie, but you've got to admit that she's got charisma
and guts. That can be either good or bad-both FDR and Hitler had it. I
don't have a personal hatred for conservatives. I don't agree with the
far right's extremist worldview, but they have a right to have that view
as long as they don't try to force it on me. For too many on both the
left and the right, politics has turned into a game of personal
hatred-they hate the person because the person has a certain viewpoint,
instead of disagreeing with the viewpoint but respecting the holder's
personal integrity. You seem to agree with the idea that life should be
a game of personal grudges, in which case I feel sorry for you. Most of
us outgrew the grudge stage a long time ago, but people like you seem to
be kept alive by your specific grudges against specific people, or
against whole groups of people. You seem to think that everybody who
doesn't agree with your specific views is evil. Sadly, you're not the
only one who thinks this way-many evangelical Christians feel the same
way, and they're running the country. In the Muslim world, such people
are called jihadin, and they are out to kill everybody who doesn't agree
with their "pure" devotion to Islam. Considering the history of
Christianity, I would bet that the evangelicals would do the same if
given half a chance. You can't argue with the type of religious devotion
that demands the murder of all heretics, meaning all those who are
insufficiently devout, even if they are from the same religious
tradition.


but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens

Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and

Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary

Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington

attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in

the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America's Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in

Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her

ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more

government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the

global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active

in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human

rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That

is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women's conference

and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was

going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children's rights and women's rights

in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive

once
again.

A: She has. That's the central focus of her public relations

campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with

women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into

the
family.

Q: She's been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of

the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of

Discrimination
against Women. Isn't she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the

future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and

social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task

than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That's very

basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+

Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

=----




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Li`Changchun July 10th 05 04:55 AM


"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
"BagLady" wrote:


Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary

Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington

attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in

the
United States Senate.


Barbara Olson died on September 11, 2001 aboard the plane that crashed
into the Pentagon.

Your credibility is shot. Maybe you and Rickets ought to get together
for a name-calling contest.


Ah, I see. Its called the new Leftwing-Socialist-Marxist history.
Since Albert Einstein is dead the theory of relativity is pure fiction.




Li`Changchun July 10th 05 05:06 AM


"running dogg" wrote in
snip
You seem to agree with the idea that life should be
a game of personal grudges, in which case I feel sorry for you. Most of
us outgrew the grudge stage a long time ago, but people like you seem to
be kept alive by your specific grudges against specific people, or
against whole groups of people. You seem to think that everybody who
doesn't agree with your specific views is evil. Sadly, you're not the
only one who thinks this way-many evangelical Christians feel the same
way, and they're running the country.


Running the country? Your nuts! But that fact doesn't surprise me coming
from the Left.

In the Muslim world, such people
are called jihadin, and they are out to kill everybody who doesn't agree
with their "pure" devotion to Islam.


Just now you figured that out? And here your spouting Chritian history as
if your a theologian.

Considering the history of
Christianity, I would bet that the evangelicals would do the same if
given half a chance. You can't argue with the type of religious devotion
that demands the murder of all heretics, meaning all those who are
insufficiently devout, even if they are from the same religious
tradition.


You seem to have a strange way of transposing ancient history into the
present
and the future. Are you an Islamic fundementalist? That would explain your
Christian grudge.
On the other hand, I suppose a Leftist would politely kneel down and kindly
beg for a Islamic beheading.





Eric F. Richards July 10th 05 05:16 PM

"Li`Changchun" wrote:


Running the country? Your nuts!


News alert: running dogg's nuts are running the country! Film at 11
(pending FCC approval).


Eric F. Richards July 10th 05 05:16 PM

"Li`Changchun" wrote:

Ah, I see. Its called the new Leftwing-Socialist-Marxist history.
Since Albert Einstein is dead the theory of relativity is pure fiction.




*What* is he trying to say? Anyone?


running dogg July 10th 05 06:20 PM

Eric F. Richards wrote:

"Li`Changchun" wrote:

Ah, I see. Its called the new Leftwing-Socialist-Marxist history.
Since Albert Einstein is dead the theory of relativity is pure fiction.




*What* is he trying to say? Anyone?


I think he thinks that you're saying that since what's her name died on
9-11 that her ideas about Hillary are irrelevant.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

MnMikew July 11th 05 06:38 PM


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far

right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?



running dogg July 12th 05 02:28 AM

MnMikew wrote:


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far

right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?


Yeah, that too. Politics in the US has become a zero sum game of tearing
down personalities rather than solving problems. Even the founders had
their share of tearing down, but they buckled down and got to work in
the end, which is much more than can be said for today's politicians.
With this version of politics, we won't need any Al Qaeda to help us
self destruct.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

MnMikew July 12th 05 03:34 PM


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the

far
right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?


Yeah, that too. Politics in the US has become a zero sum game of tearing
down personalities rather than solving problems.


Right on the money.



Michael Lawson July 13th 05 06:31 PM


"MnMikew" wrote in message
...

"running dogg" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present

in the
far
right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?


Yeah, that too. Politics in the US has become a zero sum game of

tearing
down personalities rather than solving problems.


Right on the money.


It's always been like that. The only time it's not
like that is when one party has utterly stomped the
other at the ballots. The only difference is that
the yelling and screaming is getting coarser and
is more on the center stage.

--Mike L.



Eric F. Richards July 14th 05 08:48 AM

"RHF" wrote:

EFR,
.
Here are two books written by the
'now' dead author Barbara Olsen.
.
Hell to Pay :
http://tinyurl.com/76t7b
The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton
- by Barbara Olson
- Year Published 1999
.
The Final Days :
http://tinyurl.com/b2hr3
The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
- by Barbara Olson
- Year Published 2001
.
Something Extra - The latest 'book' (Hit Piece) about


A 'book', huh? Is it, or is it not a book? A cartoon book? A
coloring book? Perhaps it is just a sheet of paper with crayon
scribblings on it.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is Edward Klein's book
"The Truth About Hillary" is currently on the
New York Times' Best-Seller List.
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/?8bu
.
The Truth About Hillary
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...0/182533.shtml
- Edward Klein
- Year Published 2005
Hillary - What She Knew !
Rodham - When She Knew It !
Clinton(s) - How Far She'll (They) Go to Become President (Again) !
.
just the facts jack ~ RHF
. . . . .



My name is not jack (or even Jack).

....but that has nothing to do with shortwave.

I have all three books.

....but that has nothing to do with shortwave.

I do not like Hillary or Bill. I think they both are sociopaths,
megalomaniacs and completely uncaring about anyone but themselves.

....but that has nothing to do with shortwave.

Until you learn that typing like a tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theorist
makes you look like a five year old, I cannot really take anything you
say seriously.

....but that has nothing to do with shortwave.

The crap that got posted was treated as if it were new or relevent.

....but it has nothing to do with shortwave.

Just because Barbara Olsen wrote it, doesn't mean it is true. She
made her living by making attacks on democrats and liberals. Whether
what she said had merit or not was irrelevent to her.

....but that has nothing to do with shortwave.

SO WHY DO YOU KEEP BRINGING THIS CRAP HERE?

Can't you and Rickets and you other morons go somewhere and beat each
other to a pulp, so the five or so of us left can talk about
shortwave?

Please... go away... go play in the streets... but just go.


--
Eric F. Richards

"I have in mind a bloodbath that is thoroughly bipartisan. Let the
Clintons be the first to go. American politics will not be healthy until
they are purged from the system. Issue exit visas to Trent Lott and Tom
DeLay, to Dick Armey, to the ancient and awful Strom Thurmond and the
odious Jesse Helms. Let the ostraca fall upon the bombastic charlatan
Jesse Jackson, upon Henry Hyde and Maxine Waters, upon Barbara Boxer
and Orrin Hatch." - Lance Morrow,
http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...,88598,00.html

RHF July 14th 05 10:26 AM

EFR,


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com