Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America’s Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women’s conference and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children’s rights and women’s rights in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive once
again.

A: She has. That’s the central focus of her public relations campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into the
family.

Q: She’s been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women. Isn’t she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That’s very basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml

The accompanying article doesn't seem to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all, but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America’s Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women’s conference and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children’s rights and women’s rights in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive once
again.

A: She has. That’s the central focus of her public relations campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into the
family.

Q: She’s been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women. Isn’t she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That’s very basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Powerful women scare the sh*t out of the right. They like 'em barefoot and
pregnant.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"running dogg" wrote The accompanying article doesn't seem
to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all,

Here lil boy let me hold your hand
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/smkgun.pdf

Perhaps your rant below simply reveals that you find Marxist-Socialist
idealogy to be compatible with your "personal" view. Perhaps that "personal
hatred" that you seem to perceive is a reflection of your "personal hatred"
for conservatives.
I have found little evidence that shows Hilary Clintoon is nothing but a
Marxist-Socialist. In which case, yes I have a "personal hatred" towards
her. Just as so many of the Millions of families whose relatives were
murdered by hineous leaders with that oh so famous "personal charisma" of
Marxism-Socialism.

but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens
Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and
Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary
Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington
attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in
the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America's Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in
Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her
ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more
government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the
global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active
in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human
rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That
is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women's conference
and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was
going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children's rights and women's rights
in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive
once
again.

A: She has. That's the central focus of her public relations
campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with
women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into
the
family.

Q: She's been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of
the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination
against Women. Isn't she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the
future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and
social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task
than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That's very
basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

Li`Changchun wrote:


"running dogg" wrote The accompanying article doesn't seem
to be about a "UN taxation plan"
at all,

Here lil boy let me hold your hand
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/smkgun.pdf

Perhaps your rant below simply reveals that you find Marxist-Socialist
idealogy to be compatible with your "personal" view. Perhaps that "personal
hatred" that you seem to perceive is a reflection of your "personal hatred"
for conservatives.
I have found little evidence that shows Hilary Clintoon is nothing but a
Marxist-Socialist. In which case, yes I have a "personal hatred" towards
her. Just as so many of the Millions of families whose relatives were
murdered by hineous leaders with that oh so famous "personal charisma" of
Marxism-Socialism.

Hillary may be a commie, but you've got to admit that she's got charisma
and guts. That can be either good or bad-both FDR and Hitler had it. I
don't have a personal hatred for conservatives. I don't agree with the
far right's extremist worldview, but they have a right to have that view
as long as they don't try to force it on me. For too many on both the
left and the right, politics has turned into a game of personal
hatred-they hate the person because the person has a certain viewpoint,
instead of disagreeing with the viewpoint but respecting the holder's
personal integrity. You seem to agree with the idea that life should be
a game of personal grudges, in which case I feel sorry for you. Most of
us outgrew the grudge stage a long time ago, but people like you seem to
be kept alive by your specific grudges against specific people, or
against whole groups of people. You seem to think that everybody who
doesn't agree with your specific views is evil. Sadly, you're not the
only one who thinks this way-many evangelical Christians feel the same
way, and they're running the country. In the Muslim world, such people
are called jihadin, and they are out to kill everybody who doesn't agree
with their "pure" devotion to Islam. Considering the history of
Christianity, I would bet that the evangelicals would do the same if
given half a chance. You can't argue with the type of religious devotion
that demands the murder of all heretics, meaning all those who are
insufficiently devout, even if they are from the same religious
tradition.


but rather another rant against Hillary. I've never understood
the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far right. Yes, she was
a student radical, yes, she is probably in favor of Big Government, but
so are many other politicians. But the blind hatred of Hillary goes
beyond her positions or her philosophy. I have been forced to conclude
that it's PERSONAL, that they hate Hillary because she's Hillary, not
because she's a radical leftie or because she's for government
regulation. Why conservatives hate Hillary the person, instead of
Hillary the politician or Hillary the radical, I can't say, and they
probably would be hard pressed to say as well. My best guess is that
they hate her because she's a strong, independent woman. Conservatives,
especially males, like their women to be barefoot, pregnant, and demure,
not forceful and strong and intellectual. Hillary is living proof that
some women will never go back to the 50s and be content with being
housewives and mothers, and the far right wing men HATE that fact.
Hillary is the most famous embodiment of it in today's America, so they
target her.


BagLady wrote:

Shocking Truth Uncovered About U.N. Taxation Plan; U.S. Citizens
Targeted
for Trillions of Dollars by the International Bureaucrats and
Insider-Trader
George Soros

http://www.usasurvival.org/

Barbara Olson, author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary
Rodham
Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent Washington
attorney
who served as a congressional investigator and as a general counsel in
the
United States Senate. She was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid, president of
America's Survival, on December 8, 2000. What follows is an edited
transcript of that interview.

Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?

A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in
Marxism. In
her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her
ideology...But
when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more
government
and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...

Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the
global
level?

A: ...She spoke at the Beijing conference on women. She was very active
in
organizations and conferences that seem to be concerned about human
rights
but which are also directed toward a centralized governmental view. That
is,
one world. I looked at her travels and saw what she was doing. I always
assumed Hillary was going to run for president. And I assumed that these
international travels and her work with the Beijing women's conference
and
the U.N. were going to be her way into the White House; that she was
going
to have a foreign policy platform that not many women have...
....
She believes her ideology to the core. She believes in a true leftist,
Socialist kind of government.

Q: She portrays her causes such as children's rights and women's rights
in
such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive
once
again.

A: She has. That's the central focus of her public relations
campaign...But
her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with
women
and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into
the
family.

Q: She's been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of
the
Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination
against Women. Isn't she promoting global government?

A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the
future
is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and
social
workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task
than a
social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That's very
basic
when you study Socialism and Marxism.
....
Much more
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"running dogg" wrote in
snip
You seem to agree with the idea that life should be
a game of personal grudges, in which case I feel sorry for you. Most of
us outgrew the grudge stage a long time ago, but people like you seem to
be kept alive by your specific grudges against specific people, or
against whole groups of people. You seem to think that everybody who
doesn't agree with your specific views is evil. Sadly, you're not the
only one who thinks this way-many evangelical Christians feel the same
way, and they're running the country.

Running the country? Your nuts! But that fact doesn't surprise me coming
from the Left.

In the Muslim world, such people
are called jihadin, and they are out to kill everybody who doesn't agree
with their "pure" devotion to Islam.

Just now you figured that out? And here your spouting Chritian history as
if your a theologian.

Considering the history of
Christianity, I would bet that the evangelicals would do the same if
given half a chance. You can't argue with the type of religious devotion
that demands the murder of all heretics, meaning all those who are
insufficiently devout, even if they are from the same religious
tradition.

You seem to have a strange way of transposing ancient history into the
present
and the future. Are you an Islamic fundementalist? That would explain your
Christian grudge.
On the other hand, I suppose a Leftist would politely kneel down and kindly
beg for a Islamic beheading.

"Li`Changchun" wrote:


Running the country? Your nuts!

News alert: running dogg's nuts are running the country! Film at 11
(pending FCC approval).

"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far
right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?

MnMikew wrote:


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the far
right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?

Yeah, that too. Politics in the US has become a zero sum game of tearing
down personalities rather than solving problems. Even the founders had
their share of tearing down, but they buckled down and got to work in
the end, which is much more than can be said for today's politicians.
With this version of politics, we won't need any Al Qaeda to help us
self destruct.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"running dogg" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:


"running dogg" wrote in message
...
I've never understood the absolute rage against Hillary present in the
far
right. "
You mean like the absolute rage against Bush in the far left?

Yeah, that too. Politics in the US has become a zero sum game of tearing
down personalities rather than solving problems.

Right on the money.