|
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:28:38 GMT, Greg wrote:
From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:38:18 GMT Subject: " Bring Em On !" On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:01:05 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: lol! I really touched a nerve today. It sure feels good to give you liberal wack jobs a taste of your own medicine. Now I can sleep well. :) P.S. Hey Greg! Don't forget to check my spelling and make sure Dave clips his toe nails before you guys jump into bed together. LOL!!!!! B.H. Liberal? Bill Cooper was my hero. David, say it ain't so! This is TOO WIERD! Greg This is (echo on) ''The Hour Of The Time...'' |
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:29:29 GMT, "Jeff"
wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message news:FsuCe.5028 Dave have you ever read a book or doe's your knowledge base come solely from the Internet? B.H. Of course. However, the internet is much more real than any book. Oh is that right? B.H. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Daves last sentence kind of speaks volumes about his depth of knowledge doesnt it.??? Having Alex Jones as some kind of mentor speaks volumes about what he "wants" to believe. J Mentor, nein. Resource, ja The real world is a scary place. I can see why you'd prefer to live in the fantasy construct offered-up by the Satanists. |
I am soooo fat,I can't even reach my toenails.I use a pair of side
cutter wire cutters to clip them. cuhulin |
What!! was you even thinking of climbing into bed with David??? Hey,not
me! cuhulin |
Returning from Vietnam in December of 1964 at San Francisco Airport,we
were greeted with spit and curses. cuhulin |
They are not the kind of p...... I like.
cuhulin |
David,old boy,girl,Minnie Pearl.I think on my own.I don't need any
help.The Wearing of the Green,The Quiet Man on tb,turn that sound up! cuhulin |
Not me,Mr.dxAce.I am not addeled.I never messed around with drugs or
dope either,I am too dumb for that.Carry On,Troop. cuhulin |
The internet Sucks! I was much better off before I got internet access
with my mickey mouse stupid webtv set top box in October 1999,,, and now I have computers too.Stop the damn World and let me off! cuhulin |
Wait a minute Jeff,I read infowars.com That doesn't mean I agree with
everything at infowars.com I read a lot of stuff on the enter her net I don't agree with. cuhulin |
The real World is only a little tiny ball of wax and we are all little
tiny little actors on the stage. cuhulin |
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:04:18 GMT, "
wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... -- Yeah! Good we have a Tough, Clear Thinking God fearing Republican in charge.. Saw him land on an Air Craft Carrier.. quite a guy.! http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlates...146228,00.html Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight. B.H. But they sure know how to TAX you! Don't you realize that any ''tax cuts'' Bush has given will have to be paid back?. He has increased the size of government and reduced civil liberties, borrowed against the future and started a vague, open-ended war against a stateless enemy (in the great tradition of LBJ [Poverty]. Nixon [Drugs] and Reagan [Brains].) Why on Earth do you support this creepy aristocrat? |
David wrote: On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:04:18 GMT, " wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... -- Yeah! Good we have a Tough, Clear Thinking God fearing Republican in charge.. Saw him land on an Air Craft Carrier.. quite a guy.! http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlates...146228,00.html Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight. B.H. But they sure know how to TAX you! Don't you realize that any ''tax cuts'' Bush has given will have to be paid back?. He has increased the size of government and reduced civil liberties, borrowed against the future and started a vague, open-ended war against a stateless enemy (in the great tradition of LBJ [Poverty]. Nixon [Drugs] and Reagan [Brains].) Why on Earth do you support this creepy aristocrat? Why? It sure beats supporting someone who shares your drug addled 'tard boy ideas, that's why. dxAce Michigan USA |
"David" wrote in message Don't you realize that any ''tax cuts'' Bush has given will have to be paid back?. He has increased the size of government and reduced civil liberties, borrowed against the future and started a vague, open-ended war against a stateless enemy (in the great tradition of LBJ [Poverty]. Nixon [Drugs] and Reagan [Brains].) Why on Earth do you support this creepy aristocrat? Two Dogs!! You talk with forked tongue. B.H. |
I realize you need to see a shrink.
cuhulin |
|
|
"David" wrote in message Wax? Maybe your world is a big ball of wax. Mine's a Ball of Confusion That ain't no ****! lol! B.H. |
David wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:01:05 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: lol! I really touched a nerve today. It sure feels good to give you liberal wack jobs a taste of your own medicine. Now I can sleep well. :) P.S. Hey Greg! Don't forget to check my spelling and make sure Dave clips his toe nails before you guys jump into bed together. LOL!!!!! B.H. Liberal? Bill Cooper was my hero. Now, had you said Lt Col. Jeff Cooper, you'd have been on to something. |
www.cryptome.org Homeland Security Spy Vehicle And Fleet.Homeland is
another one of those nazi sayings. cuhulin |
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:29:00 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Liberal? Bill Cooper was my hero. Now, had you said Lt Col. Jeff Cooper, you'd have been on to something. That would be my brother. He's been to Jeff Cooper Camp. But, he too enjoyed William Cooper. |
dxAce wrote:
LMAO at the drug addled 'tard boy! Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a bore, stayin' a bore. Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a bore. mike |
Brian Hill wrote:
Grians fine. I'll let you in on my motive for typing such a statement. Dave loves posting controversial off topic political crap daily which in turn gives me someone to mess with when I'm bored. it's not polite to kick people in the broin because of goredom. mike |
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: LMAO at the drug addled 'tard boy! Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a bore, stayin' a bore. Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a bore. Still hung up on the Bee Gee's? OK: Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a 'tard, stayin a 'tard. Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin' a 'tard, M II's stayin a 'tard. dxAce Michigan USA |
On 18 Jul 2005 02:54:32 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Sun 17 Jul 2005 07:29:00p, D Peter Maus wrote in message : David wrote: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:01:05 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: lol! I really touched a nerve today. It sure feels good to give you liberal wack jobs a taste of your own medicine. Now I can sleep well. :) P.S. Hey Greg! Don't forget to check my spelling and make sure Dave clips his toe nails before you guys jump into bed together. LOL!!!!! B.H. Liberal? Bill Cooper was my hero. Now, had you said Lt Col. Jeff Cooper, you'd have been on to something. rickets is incapable of appreciating the full meaning of "knee-deep-in- brass-and-still-shooting-fast". Though, I imagine that right about the time his beloved terrorists were drawing the knife across the first 1/4" of his own throat, he might experience an epiphany (and some regret). I'm pretty sure that's about what it would take. He's made it painfully clear that he has no concern for anyone else's throat. -=jd=- **** you, Rambo. |
On 18 Jul 2005 02:45:00 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Sat 16 Jul 2005 08:12:43p, David wrote in message : On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:40:39 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight. B.H. This page is Fair and Balanced - just like Fox News!! Prominent Democrats .... You listed the current crop of demoncrats that would treat global terrorism as a problem for cops and lawyers, despite decades of their method returning zero results. We now have an administration that is taking the fight to the terrorists. It is within the realm of possibilities that one day you may come to realize that speeding the jihadist to martyrdom is the *only* proven effective method for preventing a terrorist from committing another terrorist act. *note for everyone else - When I said "realm of possibilities", I did not mean to imply "realistic realm of possibilities". After all, he is "rickets" and the broadest range of latitude is required... -=jd=- Holding hands with a Saudi prince who has weekly public beheadings is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Flying the Bin Ladens out of the country September 13, 2001, without letting the FBI interrogate them is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? |
David wrote:
On 18 Jul 2005 02:45:00 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Sat 16 Jul 2005 08:12:43p, David wrote in message m: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:40:39 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight. B.H. This page is Fair and Balanced - just like Fox News!! Prominent Democrats .... You listed the current crop of demoncrats that would treat global terrorism as a problem for cops and lawyers, despite decades of their method returning zero results. We now have an administration that is taking the fight to the terrorists. It is within the realm of possibilities that one day you may come to realize that speeding the jihadist to martyrdom is the *only* proven effective method for preventing a terrorist from committing another terrorist act. *note for everyone else - When I said "realm of possibilities", I did not mean to imply "realistic realm of possibilities". After all, he is "rickets" and the broadest range of latitude is required... -=jd=- Holding hands with a Saudi prince who has weekly public beheadings is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Flying the Bin Ladens out of the country September 13, 2001, without letting the FBI interrogate them is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Facts being stubborn things: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. |
I much prefer taking the war on terrorism and the terrorist to them in
their countries than here in America.However,there are terrorist here in America and they are coming across our borders,so that needs to be dealt with too. cuhulin |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. |
|
David wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it! dxAce Michigan USA |
David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. Thank you, it HAS been a long day. :) |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:28:45 -0400, dxAce
wrote: You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it! dxAce Michigan USA Still sweating from a 45 minute tote in the hills. Thanks for caring! |
|
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. |
David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my mistakees and then underscore my point for me. GOD, I love the internet. "Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you for confirming that for me. And that his initiative and his procedures were approved. Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation. Thanks, David. You made my day. p |
D Peter Maus wrote: David wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my mistakees and then underscore my point for me. GOD, I love the internet. "Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you for confirming that for me. And that his initiative and his procedures were approved. Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation. Thanks, David. You made my day. Made mine also as I was sitting here wondering after he posted that if he understood the English language at all. dxAce Michigan USA |
dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: David wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my mistakees and then underscore my point for me. GOD, I love the internet. "Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you for confirming that for me. And that his initiative and his procedures were approved. Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation. Thanks, David. You made my day. Made mine also as I was sitting here wondering after he posted that if he understood the English language at all. dxAce Michigan USA Good point. Seems to be a lot of that going around these days. |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:10:28 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Huh!? You said it was General Wes Clarke. The point you neatly turned away from is that these people were allowed to flee without being put in the hot seat. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com