Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SR wrote:
Hi Eric: I am not talking about a signal streghth or SWR meter as most radio will have. It more like a scope or radar giving pattern information on the reciving attena. I was wondering if there was a device that could tell you from which dirrection and pattern the signal comming from and how. No -- that sort of plot can be generated by a sophisticated antenna system along with an equally sophisticated radio, but to do it "automagically" would be a little more difficult. Now, someone could write software to electrically or physically turn a very directional antenna and generate a signal strength vs. direction polar plot -- in fact, something similar to that is done on antenna measuring ranges, but it is non-trivial and you couldn't listen very well while it did the plot. No, what I was referring to was a Strength vs. Frequency plot, along the lines of the two graphs you see in this image: http://www.dim.com/~efricha/wrdisplay.png In the Now Your talking Book, their is a diagram of attenas patterns. I thought their must be some kind of a device for giving this information. I've seen too many WW2 movies. LOL! SR, 73! Now, Eric F. Richards wrote: SR wrote: I was wondering if their was device that I could connect to a radio while listening to the airwaves that will give me a video display on the receiving signal. Is their a such thing? SR 73! I presume you mean to display a frequency vs. signal strength graph... the answer is yes -- they are called panoramic adaptors or panadaptors. A more general device would be a spectrum analyzer, used as a panadaptor. You can expect to pay about $1500 for a new one, and at least one is being made today. I bought one for about $100 and was only marginally satisfied. I bought a spectrum analyzer for $300 that does a much better job. You can read about my experiences in this thread, using Google news, starting with this article: Message-ID: -- Eric F. Richards "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents." - Nathaniel S. Borenstein |