|
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:19:01 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: *sigh*... And you even replied to the post where I stated it previously! What defines military success in Iraq? Succintly: Replacing Saddam Hussein and his regime with a democratic styled govt that can stand on it's own. We've removed Saddam. We've removed his regime. They have already had free and open elections once. They are about to ratify their constitution. I'd say we are well on the way to acheiving our goal there. I can't wait to hear your dissappointment! -=jd=- By ''democratic styled govt'' you of course mean an Islamic Theocracy aligned with Iran. OK. We did it. Now let's flee. Peace with honor. |
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:20:32 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: It means the Taliban are regaining control of Afghanistan. That would be incorrect as well. Any other guesses? Or, would you rather just visit the U.N. site and read it for yourself? -=jd=- The UN is not to be trusted. |
David wrote: On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:19:01 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: *sigh*... And you even replied to the post where I stated it previously! What defines military success in Iraq? Succintly: Replacing Saddam Hussein and his regime with a democratic styled govt that can stand on it's own. We've removed Saddam. We've removed his regime. They have already had free and open elections once. They are about to ratify their constitution. I'd say we are well on the way to acheiving our goal there. I can't wait to hear your dissappointment! -=jd=- By ''democratic styled govt'' you of course mean an Islamic Theocracy aligned with Iran. OK. We did it. Now let's flee. Peace with honor. 'Tard boy... you wouldn't know honour if it crawled up your mentally retarded ass and decided to spend the winter. Now get on out there and tote it whilst you still have a little daylight left. dxAce Michigan USA |
He would probally trust a 'snow snake' though.
cuhulin |
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:04:16 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: Fail to succeed in it's military efforts, whether in large part or in small part, regardless of the various goals of those efforts. Rather, in your blind hatred for Bush, you would probably go so far as to sacrifice (in every sense of the word) the entire Republic to slake your thirst for spite and vengeance at being marginalized and rejected politically. Ain't that so... I'm sorry, you must not have gotten the word that purple prose is no longer allowed on usenet. Please cancel your posting. |
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:22:26 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Sat 03 Sep 2005 02:26:32a, wrote in message : On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:35:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Thu 01 Sep 2005 10:05:35p, wrote in message : On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:04:16 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: Fail to succeed in it's military efforts, whether in large part or in small part, regardless of the various goals of those efforts. Rather, in your blind hatred for Bush, you would probably go so far as to sacrifice (in every sense of the word) the entire Republic to slake your thirst for spite and vengeance at being marginalized and rejected politically. Ain't that so... I'm sorry, you must not have gotten the word that purple prose is no longer allowed on usenet. Please cancel your posting. If you can't deny my truths, just say so. There's no need to camoflage your lack of a substantive reply by ignoring the issue. That you feel too inadequate to frame a response, sans ad-hominem, is duly noted! -=jd=- Note my ass -- it's pointed in our general direction. As I said, and which you so un-subtly evaded yet again, "If you can't deny my truths, just say so. There's no need to camoflage your lack of a substantive reply by ignoring the issue. That you feel too inadequate to frame a response, sans ad-hominem, is duly noted!" Now, are ya' done yet or would you like another drubbing? -=jd=- Maybe, when you're through drubbing your dick. The corrct construction, by the way, is sine ad hominem. slopping a bt if French before a Latin phrase only makes you look dumb. But you continue to do pompous well. "Noted" -- how ****ing superior. |
You need to learn how to operate a spelling book and learn how to spell.
cuhulin |
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:01:35 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: So nice to see we have another college poseur on staff here in R.R.S. "Sans" is a perfectly acceptable when used to indicate a "lack of" or "without". If you would like to get technical, there's this: [Sans: Middle English, from Old French, blend of Latin sine, without, and absenti, in the absence of, ablative of absentia, absence from absns, absent- present participle of abesse, to be away. See absent.] Also, since you are now resorting to a "grammer-dodge", I won't mention your substandard spelling. I'll leave the desperate "grammer-dodge" tactic to you. Now, where were we. Oh Yes! As I said, and which you so un-subtly evaded yet again AND AGAIN, "If you can't deny my truths, just say so. There's no need to camoflage your lack of a substantive reply by ignoring the issue. That you feel too inadequate to frame a response, sans ad-hominem, is duly noted!" Now, would you like YET ANOTHER drubbing or are ya' done yet? Spank you very much, Your pal, -=jd=- You just stood there screaming Fearing no one was listening to you They say the empty can rattles the most The sound of your voice must soothe you Hearing only what you want to hear And knowing only what you’ve heard You you’re smothered in tragedy You’re out to save the world Misery You insist that the weight of the world Should be on your shoulders Misery There’s much more to life than what you see My friend of misery You still stood there screaming No one caring about these words you tell My friend before your voice is gone One man’s fun is another’s hell These times are sent to try men’s souls But something’s wrong with all you see You you’ll take it on all yourself Remember, misery loves company Misery You insist that the weight of the world Should be on your shoulders Misery There’s much more to life than what you see My friend of misery You just stood there creaming My friend of misery -Hetfield/Ulrich |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com