RadioBanter - CNN: New Orleans Hospital Burning - Resue Aircraft Taking & Returning Fire

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)

- - CNN: New Orleans Hospital Burning - Resue Aircraft Taking & Returning Fire (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/77519-re-cnn-new-orleans-hospital-burning-resue-aircraft-taking-returning-fire.html)

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:42 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Hey, -- Magnum -- that's just a brand of rubber, isn't it?

Is it, titter titter that was so funny....ha ahahaha youll never
need
one
as
your just a little pecker.... yawl have a nice day now

You'll need one, you big dickhead.

Yes i am rather well endowed.... nice of you to notice but i dont bat
your
way so kindly keep your eyes off...

You likely don't bat at all.

Which shows really you know nothing about me and are quite an immature
name
caller...

You still don't bat.

Im married with 4 daughters... and we showed the Aussies we can Bat :o) The
Ashes are OURS... wooo hoooh

Top Politicians,Economist Say 911 Possibly Inside Job. www.rense.com
cuhulin

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:46:08 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:56:06 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:13:08 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote
in
message
...
U-Know-Who wrote:
Well, if you ignore their cooking...
--

Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes,
and
cabbage?

Horsemeat.... I thought at first glance you'd written
"horse****".
You
wouldn't
have been far off if you had.

Ha haa hahahahaa aha pot and kettles with black included mate.
Every
country
knows the truth with that one, i wont push it further..

English five-star hotel -- one with French cooks.

Id say American 5 star hotel, with a Fatty Arbuckles or McDonalds
franchise

but you already know that...

Best you can do for a smiug-**** reply?

If we'd let the Germans have you in WWII, you'd at least have
a marginally better "cuisine" right now.

You do sprawl some absolute drivel. Id get out a bit more if i was
you....

Your ass was on the block and you damned well know it. As does
everyone else.

Sprawl??? Some kind of homespun limey longo? You should just
get out. Permanently.

Yes its a proper word even mentioned the the Concise English Dictionary...
try reading it sometimes, it will help with your spelling

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:52:15 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:59:13 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:11:01 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 18...
On Thu 08 Sep 2005 06:14:23p, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote in message
:

The Magnum wrote:
I think you will find your ancestors are english, unless your a
red
indian you halfwit. Or a Peurto Rican scumbag. The people who
came
into
contact with The British Empire learnt "well some of you did"
how
to
become civilised. If it wasnt for the Likes of the British
Empire
you
would be running round in animalskin pants with a spear and
live
in a
mud hut.... so blow it out your ass chummy.........

You guys are civilized now? When did that happen?

I really need to get out more....

Well, if you ignore their cooking...

-=jd=-
--

Now really, how creative can you get with horsemeat, potatoes, and
cabbage?

Put enough curry in it and you can gag it down. Some people
forget which way civilization lowed in this regard.

So come on then mr food critic, give us an insight into what you eat
then
which puts you in a position to criticise or even to know what your
typing
about... and what do you mean by civilisation lowed in this regard...
its
a
bit of a strange statement...

Flowed, jerkoff. You have no gift for context. You're simply
unwilling to admit the only thing to recommend eating in England is
that which you were given by those you subjugated, natve English
"cuisine" is pasty crap.

Well given the standard of your spelling how are we supposed to know what
you are on about. And as for gift of context the utter drivel you spout
is
quite amusing. It also lets others know you are quite immature and dont
know
an awful lot. If I was to get down to the same level as you I would say
all
you americans eat are donuts, turkey and mcdonalds..... thats the
steriotype
which i know not to be true... now you need to realise what you know is
untrue too...

Lessee, spelling -- donuts mcdonalds i -- you have a lot to
criticize with. But since you think you'd have kicked German ass
alone, maybe you're better off caviling about spelling since you have
nothing substantive to argue with.

Ermm, i think you have me mixed up with someone else. Your the only one whos
mentioned the war... i think you have voices in your head which explains a
lot....

"Honus" wrote in message
news:M4qVe.7544$8h6.5893@trnddc09...

"The Magnum" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message
news:OfZUe.7151$8h6.3446@trnddc09...

"The Magnum" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message
news:LgKUe.1743$b37.486@trnddc04...

"The Magnum" wrote in
message
...

Well, if you ignore their cooking...

Whats wrong with list deleted

The way you "cook" it.

Which way is that??

Badly?

In what way is it cooked badly?? and to what are you referring to?? if
your
going to make a statement at least "put some meat on the bones"

Why bother? It'd just end up over-cooked. ;)

Oh yes, i forgot you like everything RAW... :oP

Comprehension is a big word for you to spell correctly,

But I did so successfully, didn't I.

**Yes but quite probably because you looked it up in the dictionary....
shame you let yourself down in the next sentance though mis spelling a
simple word. You used "to" in place of "too"
By the way i dont own a pink horsie so either youve mistaken me for someone
else again or you have this sort of fettish going on in your head.... It's,
Isn't and Didn't are all correct terms of use. **

You, in turn, followed up immediately with -- its, isnt, and
didnt (all incorrect) in the following two sentences. So get down off
your pretentious pink horsie before criticizing my orthgraphy. Back
from the dictionary yet, you twit?

** Me the twit... lol, then you say a word that doesnt exist orthgraphy
unless you meant Orthography. Horsie also doesnt exist as a word... i could
go on.. and youd come back with more garbage so ill leave it there... carry
on if you must but im not going to waste any more time on you... have a nice
day now...

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:13:54 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
The Magnum wrote:

So Michael, the point you make here is that the different tribes in
America
were already into slavery and used them to barter with the English
for
goods
and suchlike therefore making my point that slavery wasnt a result of
the
good old British Colonies... They may have been involved in the
transportation of slaves for profilt but that wasnt the point. The
previous
post said, or tried to imply it was the British Colonies that
introduced
slavery where that simply wasnt the case.

Also most of the slaves who ended up in Britain werent treated quite
as
badly in comparison although they probably didnt think so at the
time.

Anyhows this has lead a little off topic as so many threads do, but
its
nice
to actually have a converstaion about things rather than cheap
insults.
Thank you..

The British ships that arrived on the US coast wanted cotton to take
to England. That is where they finally got paid. Then they restocked
the ship with goods for Africa and repeated the cycle. All they had
when
they arrived on the shores of the US to trade their cargo was a ship
load of slaves and a few manufactured goods from England. They traded
both of them for cotton.

Only an idiot would mistreat any worker that was doing their best.
After all, if you kill all the help you won't make enough money to
live,
will you? And then there were "Indentured servants" who traded a
number
of years or labor for passage to the US, and were basically slaves
during that time. Legally they were the property of whoever paid their
way, till their time was up.

I never said I approved of any slavery. On the other hand there
were
people of every race who were held in slavery at one time or another
throughout the history of mankind, and this still doesn't make it right
at any time.

--
?

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Please dont think for one minute i support or ever did support slavery...
because i dont and you know, as well as i that slavery still goes on in
many
countrys today, especially some third world countrys but there is also
still
a lot of it in the US and to a degree the UK too. I have no problems with
the comments you have made Michael and on the whole i agree with you.
The whole arguement on this thread was someone whit half a brain saying
it
was the British Empire that created slavery.. and it simply isnt true.
All i
pointed out was that slavery was massive in the US and you even had
internal
wars over it so to have a go at the UK over slavery was a bit idiotic.
Cheers...

More illiterate drivel from the looney who finds fit to
criticize the spelling of his betters. Anyone who can't pick out at
least ten spelling, capitalization or grammar errors in this pompous
blowhard's tripe should review the fundamentals.

How are we to follow a conversation littered with grammatical errors that
make words unrecognisable? And as illiteracy goes, surely it's the "dum dum"
who can't spell that's illiterate. And as for betters... LMFAO....
As far as fundamentals go too, I was quite happy to have a sensible
meaningful discussion but, as with many postings in here, you let yourselves
down badly with incorrect theories of History and seem to have no real grasp
of reality and any realistic command of the English language. Then because
the person posting isn't American you jump in with both feet then get upset
when you're shown up. Mock me if you will but in the end it will be you who
shows themselves up... 10-4

"Lancer" wrote in message
news:4325e0b5.29616562@2355323778...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:10:32 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

"Lancer" wrote in message
news:4325d050.25419343@2355323778...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:24:48 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in
America.
The first imported African slaves brought to the British North
American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619.

Long before the U.S.A. existed.

In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering
English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland.
Between
the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland
by
the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands
of
Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply
religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who
had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land
confiscated
and were transported to the West Indies as slaves.

Actually it was the british colonies that introduced slavery in
America.
The first imported African slaves brought to the British North
American colonies were landed at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619.

Long before the U.S.A. existed.

In the 17th century, slavery was used as punishment by conquering
English Parliament armies against native Catholics in Ireland. Between
the years 1649 and 1653, during the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland by
the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell, thousands of
Irish Catholics were forced into slavery. Cromwell had a deeply
religious antipathy to the Catholic religion and Irish Catholics who
had participated in Confederate Ireland had all their land confiscated
and were transported to the West Indies as slaves.

Eh?? why are you telling me this?? I didnt say and never have that
slavery
never existed in the UK and i never said The British Empire didnt
condone
and use slavery. But the English never introduced slavery to the US

Yes it was directed to you.

Because the British did introduce slavery to the U.S.

Chronology Of The History Of Slavery: 1619-1789

1619
The other crucial event that would play a role in the development of
America
was the arrival of Africans to Jamestown. A Dutch slave trader
exchanged
his
cargo of Africans for food in 1619. The Africans became indentured
servants,
similar in legal position to many poor Englishmen who traded several
years
labor in exchange for passage to America. The popular conception of a
racial-based slave system did not develop until the 1680's. (A Brief
History
of Jamestown, The Association for the Preservation of Virginia
Antiquities,
Richmond, VA 23220, email: , Web published February,
2000)

Note the word DUTCH....
Regards,
Graham

Yes note the word Dutch, as, British colonization imported 21 slaves
from a Dutch frigate to the colony in Jamestown, Virginia in 1619,
three of whom are known to have been named Isabella, Antoney and
Pedro. Isabella and Antoney had later given birth to a slave boy named
William. This "William Tucker" is now considered the first African
American born in the English colonies in North America. The Dutch
delivered them, the British enslaved them.

Note the word British....

Dont you think if the DUTCH person SOLD them to the ENGLISH colonies then
they were ALREADY slaves???

Does it matter? They were brought to America, to end up as slaves to
the British, it doesn't matter who brought them here, it could have
been martians with flying saucers. The English introduced slavery to
the US. The Dutch most certainly didn't force the Brits at gun point
to take the slaves?

The English never introduced slavery to the US, it was the Dutch.. Anyway as
you say, does it really matter? I wasn't the one to bring the subject of
slavery up and to be honest i'm not that bothered if slavery was a "British
Colonial" thing... Judge people by who they are today not by things that
happened far in the past. Your great granddad could have "friendly fired"
and killed his allies (my relatives) but I certainly wouldn't hold it
against you.

I think its time to move on to more interesting topics, don't you?

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:26:31 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

So who are your ancestors... where did they originate from?

Ireland.

Yes indeed, it explains your attitude... did you hear about the Rioting
in
Belfast yesterday BTW...shocking... just animals....

If the Brits and their proxies would just give up their
ill-gotten gains and get the hell out, it would all disappear in a
minute. But no, they have to hang on like a dog with a bone. Grasping
*******s.

I think you'll find it's the Irish that ignore the wishes of their fellow
citizens and didn't care about their rights is actually what happened. If it
weren't for the RUC and the Army you would have wiped yourselves out years
ago. What possible motive have people got to riot, smash up and burn cars,
shoot guns at people who are trying to bring calm to the situation and
murder people (sounds very NO, maybe it wasn't the blacks there it was the
Irish in black balaclavas)... And as for it would all disappear in a minute
you live in cloud cuckoo land.
Now stop being so silly..