|
OT I noticed!
The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11
but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! B.H. |
liberals are agains't showing pictures of our American Military War dead
too,they are even agains't showing pictures of the Coffins at Dover. cuhulin |
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! B.H. Cite please for both? |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:59:55 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote: The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! B.H. Dead victims, or the rest of us? |
fed govt doesn't want us to see pictures of the Katrina dead people.
www.bellaciao.org Article,Send us the pictures.I Agree with www.bellaciao.org or whom ever wrote that Article. cuhulin |
"FDR" wrote in message ... "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! B.H. Cite please for both? Common knowledge for those of us that paid attention. Have you been out of the loop or just didn't pay attention? B.H. |
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message ... "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! B.H. Cite please for both? Common knowledge for those of us that paid attention. Have you been out of the loop or just didn't pay attention? B.H. I don't hear anything about showing hurricane victims. Wouldn't the liberal media be doing that if it were so? |
"FDR" wrote in message I don't hear anything about showing hurricane victims. Wouldn't the liberal media be doing that if it were so? Heres what I read and my point is the liberals were all against showing images of 9/11 but now that they think theres an angle to help them politicly they want to show pics of the the poor victims of Katrina. Talk about hypocrites! B.H. MoveOn.Org Anti-John Roberts Ad Politicizes Katrina Victims -------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Tina Sims Sep 8, 2005 The left-wing advocacy group MoveOn.Org is set to run a campaign style commercial aimed at stopping federal Judge John Roberts' confirmation as chief justice. Mark Memmott of USA Today writes that the group will use televised images of "poverty-stricken evacuees from Hurricane Katrina" as part of a "provocative, last-minute effort" to derail Roberts' nomination. No surprise there, liberals have attempted to exploit the victims of this tragedy since day one of the storm. "The connection is obvious," Ben Brandzel, the group's advocacy director said. "The images after Hurricane Katrina show we still live in a society where significant racial inequities exist. We believe John Roberts' record on civil rights ... is clearly not the direction our country needs to head now." Memo to MoveOn.Org: The images come from the liberal utopia of New Orleans. New Orleans is run by Democrats, and the result is way too many people living in poverty waiting for their next government check. Black and white. Liberalism and the results of the policies of that type of thinking are on full display in Louisiana and it's a sad picture. MoveOn.Org will try to blame conservatives for that--but if yesterday's Gallup poll is accurate, they are only playing to the echo chamber of the sad, angry 13 percent. That's not going to stop the Roberts' nomination, but I suspect the real goal is to raise more money from the angry left. (Soon to be re-named the angry 13%?) "It is sickening that some in Washington would politicize a national tragedy," said Sean Rushton, executive director of the conservative group Committee for Justice. Sickening indeed, but expected. --News Analysis by Tina Sims |
The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11
but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! You really need to get a hobby, man. How 'bout shortwave radio? |
"Brian Running" wrote in message ... The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! You really need to get a hobby, man. How 'bout shortwave radio? Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. -- 73 and good DX. B.H. Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
Brian Hill wrote: "Brian Running" wrote in message ... The liberals were totally against showing pictures of the victims of 9/11 but are all for showing the victims of the hurricane. Ahh! another clue! You really need to get a hobby, man. How 'bout shortwave radio? Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? Because he'd probably get his ass handed to him, that's why! BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. -- 73 and good DX. B.H. Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message I don't hear anything about showing hurricane victims. Wouldn't the liberal media be doing that if it were so? Heres what I read and my point is the liberals were all against showing images of 9/11 but now that they think theres an angle to help them politicly they want to show pics of the the poor victims of Katrina. Talk about hypocrites! B.H. Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. MoveOn.Org Anti-John Roberts Ad Politicizes Katrina Victims -------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Tina Sims Sep 8, 2005 The left-wing advocacy group MoveOn.Org is set to run a campaign style commercial aimed at stopping federal Judge John Roberts' confirmation as chief justice. Mark Memmott of USA Today writes that the group will use televised images of "poverty-stricken evacuees from Hurricane Katrina" as part of a "provocative, last-minute effort" to derail Roberts' nomination. No surprise there, liberals have attempted to exploit the victims of this tragedy since day one of the storm. "The connection is obvious," Ben Brandzel, the group's advocacy director said. "The images after Hurricane Katrina show we still live in a society where significant racial inequities exist. We believe John Roberts' record on civil rights ... is clearly not the direction our country needs to head now." Memo to MoveOn.Org: The images come from the liberal utopia of New Orleans. New Orleans is run by Democrats, and the result is way too many people living in poverty waiting for their next government check. Black and white. Liberalism and the results of the policies of that type of thinking are on full display in Louisiana and it's a sad picture. MoveOn.Org will try to blame conservatives for that--but if yesterday's Gallup poll is accurate, they are only playing to the echo chamber of the sad, angry 13 percent. That's not going to stop the Roberts' nomination, but I suspect the real goal is to raise more money from the angry left. (Soon to be re-named the angry 13%?) "It is sickening that some in Washington would politicize a national tragedy," said Sean Rushton, executive director of the conservative group Committee for Justice. Sickening indeed, but expected. I don't recall conservatives complaining when they (Republicans) used 9/11 and terrorism for political gain during the last election. Go back and watch the RNC convention. --News Analysis by Tina Sims |
"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! B.H. |
Most of them wimmins don't "notice",, durn it!
cuhulin |
I have seen some of my buddys in Vietnam,dead.Yes,it bothered me no
end.Some "things" we HAVE to see. cuhulin |
www.devilfinder.com O Brother,Where Art Thou? Soundtrack, my
imortal homeeeee,,,,,,, (The Stanleys) cuhulin |
Dahhhhh,,, Boolsheet! Let me see what this movie comin up on Turner
(S..T) South is,,, It's the jerkoff,The Jerk movie. cuhulin |
I ain't no *******,butt,my alter eggo,webtv pretend webtv user name
thangy,,, them crazy wimmins think I am a real bitch. cuhulin |
I don't care what you noticed.AWOL MORON gay bush's gay "daddy" got gay
AWOL MORON g.w.bush ahead of the line in "joining" the Texas Guard.AWOL MORON gay g.w.bush went AWOL,AWOL MORON gay bush went to South America (exotic plants,, more drug dealing) when he (AWOL MORON bush) went AWOL.Where is that Stupid Son Of A BITCH (AWOL gay MORON bush) AWOL gay MORON bush now!? Get This,, I am always Right. cuhulin |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:42:46 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote: "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! B.H. Good thing W is backed by a fine, upstanding man like Rove, who would never do such a thing. We are ruly blessed in this. |
Is rove gay like bush is?
cuhulin |
dxAce wrote:
Because he'd probably get his ass handed to him, that's why! I notice your latest Canadian visit is making headlines! http://tinyurl.com/bj59q It's good of you to use your personage for a worthwhile cause. You must be very proud. mike mike |
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: Because he'd probably get his ass handed to him, that's why! I notice your latest Canadian visit is making headlines! I'm sure it will make headlines, 'tard boy. We plan on calling it the "Occupation and Subjugation Tour" The advance press seems to think it will be a rapid tour. dxAce Michigan USA |
Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of
these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. Nobody hit the roof, Brian. I enjoy your radio-related posts, and you seem like a genuinely good guy. My point is, I'd hate to see you become like the paranoiac, delusional, political loonies that infest this group. Your post had more than a little bit of that tone in it. I assure you that your involvement in the radio hobby is far greater than mine. I had a novice license in the early '70s, and never went any further than that in ham radio. Nowadays, I listen primarily to utility stuff via a couple of little Radio Shack portables. Just about anybody here is more into radio than I am. But, we really don't need any more right-wing American loonies in this group, know what I mean? |
Brian Running wrote: Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. Nobody hit the roof, Brian. I enjoy your radio-related posts, and you seem like a genuinely good guy. My point is, I'd hate to see you become like the paranoiac, delusional, political loonies that infest this group. Your post had more than a little bit of that tone in it. I assure you that your involvement in the radio hobby is far greater than mine. I had a novice license in the early '70s, and never went any further than that in ham radio. Nowadays, I listen primarily to utility stuff via a couple of little Radio Shack portables. Just about anybody here is more into radio than I am. But, we really don't need any more right-wing American loonies in this group, know what I mean? Sure... you mean you're a left-wing 'tard. Gotcha. You'd better be Running along now. dxAce Michigan USA |
|
Yeah,Brian is a good guy.But,Brian,don't be looking at me funningly,I am
not your type. cuhulin |
"Brian Running" wrote in message ... Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. Nobody hit the roof, Brian. I enjoy your radio-related posts, and you seem like a genuinely good guy. My point is, I'd hate to see you become like the paranoiac, delusional, political loonies that infest this group. Your post had more than a little bit of that tone in it. I assure you that your involvement in the radio hobby is far greater than mine. I had a novice license in the early '70s, and never went any further than that in ham radio. Nowadays, I listen primarily to utility stuff via a couple of little Radio Shack portables. Just about anybody here is more into radio than I am. But, we really don't need any more right-wing American loonies in this group, know what I mean? We don't need any more left wing loonies either! |
dxAce wrote:
I'm sure it will make headlines, 'tard boy. We plan on calling it the "Occupation and Subjugation Tour" Iraq was just a practice run for the invasion of Canada? People like you don't belong in a civilized society, so it may be fitting that your only friends are the guns you keep hidden away for a rainy day. I'm surprised the Michigan Health Department granted you possession privileges..or does your militia do it's own sanity checks? The advance press seems to think it will be a rapid tour. You deviates sure have a lot of synonyms for anal sex. Did you admit your homosexuality to your commanding officers? What did you have to do to get Colonel's rank in your militia? I'll bet there was lots of alcohol involved... What a loser... mike |
m II wrote: What a loser... Yeah, that's what you say to yourself every morning as you look in the mirror to pop another pimple, isn't it, 'tard boy? dxAce Michigan USA |
In article ,
Brian Running wrote: Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours. Nobody hit the roof, Brian. I enjoy your radio-related posts, and you seem like a genuinely good guy. My point is, I'd hate to see you become like the paranoiac, delusional, political loonies that infest this group. Your post had more than a little bit of that tone in it. I assure you that your involvement in the radio hobby is far greater than mine. I had a novice license in the early '70s, and never went any further than that in ham radio. Nowadays, I listen primarily to utility stuff via a couple of little Radio Shack portables. Just about anybody here is more into radio than I am. But, we really don't need any more right-wing American loonies in this group, know what I mean? The off topic loonies of which the political posts comprise a great deal of it is about 2/3'rds of the posts. I don't see that changing unless someone goes after them. You expect people to go off topic occasionally but there is a small group people here that posts off topic all the time or very close to it. Your level of involvement in short wave is not the issue it's what you post here in the news group. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
We don't need any more left wing loonies either!
I agree, whole-heartedly. |
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC. B.H. |
FDR wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC. You got something against the flag, ****stain? The RNC is free to hold their convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain. Continue to tote and whine, ****stain! dxAce Michigan USA |
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:37:17 -0400, dxAce
wrote: FDR wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC. You got something against the flag, ****stain? The RNC is free to hold their convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain. Thanks for demonstrating your lack of perception for anything not precisely literal, cumstain. Bring on the totes, 'tards and canucks, you lame snatch. Continue to tote and whine, ****stain! dxAce Michigan USA |
"dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC. You got something against the flag, ****stain? I'm tired of Bush desecrating it so he can get votes. The RNC is free to hold their convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Yep, and they freely chose it in a place for poltical gain. It's not my fault you can't see it, or have been brainwashed by the RNC to not see it. Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain. Continue to tote and whine, ****stain! dxAce Michigan USA |
FDR wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... FDR wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "FDR" wrote in message Hmmm, when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies. As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there. Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it! Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC. You got something against the flag, ****stain? I'm tired of Bush desecrating it so he can get votes. When has President Bush *desecrated* the flag? The RNC is free to hold their convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Yep, and they freely chose it in a place for poltical gain. It's not my fault you can't see it, or have been brainwashed by the RNC to not see it. Well at least I've not been brainwashed by the DNC! Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain. Continue to tote and whine, ****stain! dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com