|
OT Toxins At Ground Below Zero Coverup
|
"David" wrote in message ... http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html HAHA. Right from Air America to Buzzflash. Once again the loony left trying to make something out of nothing. Floodwaters in NO polluted? No, really? Duh! |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:55:40 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html HAHA. Right from Air America to Buzzflash. Once again the loony left trying to make something out of nothing. Floodwaters in NO polluted? No, really? Duh! It appears to have slipped under the radar at Weird Nut Daily... |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:15:50 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Tue 13 Sep 2005 09:58:46p, David wrote in message : http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html Hmmm... Googling +"Katrina" +"toxin" tends to indicate that practically *everyone* is aware of, and has reported, the toxic soup in NOLA, to include (but not limited to) the big-4 MSM outlets, blogs, nuts, amateurs, hobbyists, etc. -=jd=- The EPA mystery man says the toxins pose a more severe hazard, like the Pile after 9-11, where the Agency also lied about the relative safety. |
How many after hurricanes (and otherwise non after hurricanes
situations) toxic grounds areas have been cleaned up and then put back into good use.I know of at least one,Mississippi Gulf Coast after hurricane Camille of 1969.And I don't know for sure but I don't think Halliburton and Bechtel and Kellog,Brown & Root were doing the rebuilding or most of the rebuilding either. cuhulin |
-=jd=- wrote: On Wed 14 Sep 2005 06:02:40p, David wrote in message : On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:15:50 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Tue 13 Sep 2005 09:58:46p, David wrote in message m: http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html Hmmm... Googling +"Katrina" +"toxin" tends to indicate that practically *everyone* is aware of, and has reported, the toxic soup in NOLA, to include (but not limited to) the big-4 MSM outlets, blogs, nuts, amateurs, hobbyists, etc. -=jd=- The EPA mystery man says the toxins pose a more severe hazard, like the Pile after 9-11, where the Agency also lied about the relative safety. He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity* of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst. I find it difficult to understand why you're burning cycles trying to read significance into that, when there is something far more worthy of your angst: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12637172.htm Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows "...Chertoff's Aug. 30 memo for the first time declared Katrina an "Incident of National Significance," a key designation that triggers swift federal coordination. The following afternoon, Bush met with his Cabinet, then appeared before TV cameras in the White House Rose Garden to announce the government's planned action..." Apparently, there has been an increase in federal authority, under certain circumstances, with the current NRP. You may now commence running in circles & screaming that the sky is falling. Will he say that we're really, really, really doomed now? dxAce Michigan USA |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:14:48 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity* of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst. Opinion? Where do you see opinion? This is eyewitness testimony. ''Hugh Kauffman, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Environmental Protection Agency who specializes in emergency response, told Morning Sedition hosts Marc Maron and Mark Riley that a government cover-up is taking place right now, as we speak, to hide information about the dangerous toxins in the flood waters of the Gulf Coast region. Kauffman, a 35-year EPA veteran who has served in Republican and Democratic administrations, says that the Bush administration is preventing the EPA from releasing information that oil and chemical companies are mandated by law to provide. Kauffman says the Bush administration’s cover-up is endangering residents and relief workers throughout the Gulf Coast region, who are being exposed to dangerous levels of toxins, some of which have been proven to cause cancer and birth defects. Kauffman, who was the chief investigator for the 9/11 clean up, also said that the Bush administration engaged in the same practice after 9/11—covering up the truth about the dangers in the air and water and lying to the public in the weeks after the disaster. Kauffman said that over 75% of the heroes who responded to 9/11 have gotten sick and in some cases have died because of exposure to toxins at Ground Zero, and that he fears a similar fate will befall relief workers and residents in the Gulf Coast now.'' |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:14:48 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity* of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst. Opinion? Where do you see opinion? This is eyewitness testimony. ''Hugh Kauffman, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Environmental Protection Agency who specializes in emergency response, told Morning Sedition hosts Marc Maron and Mark Riley that a government cover-up is taking place right now, as we speak, to hide information about the dangerous toxins in the flood waters of the Gulf Coast region. Kauffman, a 35-year EPA veteran who has served in Republican and Democratic administrations, says that the Bush administration is preventing the EPA from releasing information that oil and chemical companies are mandated by law to provide. Kauffman says the Bush administration’s cover-up is endangering residents and relief workers throughout the Gulf Coast region, who are being exposed to dangerous levels of toxins, some of which have been proven to cause cancer and birth defects. Kauffman, who was the chief investigator for the 9/11 clean up, also said that the Bush administration engaged in the same practice after 9/11—covering up the truth about the dangers in the air and water and lying to the public in the weeks after the disaster. Kauffman said that over 75% of the heroes who responded to 9/11 have gotten sick and in some cases have died because of exposure to toxins at Ground Zero, and that he fears a similar fate will befall relief workers and residents in the Gulf Coast now.'' How many times a day do you experience fecal incontinence? dxAce Michigan USA |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:24:40 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Will he say that we're really, really, really doomed now? You figure it out. You're a pretty fart smeller. This example pretty much sums things up. ''I prosecute polluters on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Riverkeeper and Waterkeeper Alliance. As George W. Bush began his presidency, I was involved in litigation against the factory-pork industry, which is a large source of air and water pollution in America. Corporate pork factories cannot produce more efficiently than traditional family farmers without violating several federal environmental statutes. Industrial farms illegally dump millions of tons of untreated fecal and toxic waste onto land and into the air and water. Factory farms have contaminated hundreds of miles of waterways, put tens of thousands of family farmers and fishermen out of work, killed billions of fish, sickened consumers and subjected millions of farm animals to unspeakable cruelty'' -RFK Jr. http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1120-01.htm |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:43:50 -0400, dxAce
wrote: How many times a day do you experience fecal incontinence? I have my **** together. |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:43:50 -0400, dxAce wrote: How many times a day do you experience fecal incontinence? I have my **** together. Right there in the Depends, eh? dxAce Michigan USA |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:24:40 -0400, dxAce wrote: Will he say that we're really, really, really doomed now? You figure it out. You're a pretty fart smeller. This example pretty much sums things up. ''I prosecute polluters on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Riverkeeper and Waterkeeper Alliance. As George W. Bush began his presidency, I was involved in litigation against the factory-pork industry, which is a large source of air and water pollution in America. Corporate pork factories cannot produce more efficiently than traditional family farmers without violating several federal environmental statutes. Industrial farms illegally dump millions of tons of untreated fecal and toxic waste onto land and into the air and water. Factory farms have contaminated hundreds of miles of waterways, put tens of thousands of family farmers and fishermen out of work, killed billions of fish, sickened consumers and subjected millions of farm animals to unspeakable cruelty'' -RFK Jr. This RFK guy, isn't he related to that Senator from Massachusetts who should have been jailed long ago for murder or manslaughter? dxAce Michigan USA |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:52:50 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: So, how bout' that Chertoff? Do you agree that by simply declaring a situation as an "Incident of National Significance," the feds should be allowed increased authority that could countermand the authority of a Governor? How about if the Governer resists it? As I understand it, the Governor retains control of civilian law enforcement and authority over any state's NG which have been sent to her for that purpose. No sane governor would say no to federal disaster relief. Chertoff is a bigger idiot than Bush or Brown. Apparently the only people in the Executive Branch following events were Bush's staff and they were afraid to tell him how bad it was. |
If Jackson ever gets destroyed by a whole slew of big a.. tornados,,,
S...w Halliburton and Kellog,Brown & Root and Bechtel! We can rebuild this town ourselves.About a mile West of me on Highway 80 is an old ex Lowes store that went out of business about 16 years ago.It is nowdays a sort of a storage place and they have some vans sitting out there for rent too.I remember seeing a storm/tornado shelter for sale that is sitting in the fenced in area.I might run by there one day this week and ask about that shelter. cuhulin |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:27:00 -0400, dxAce
wrote: This RFK guy, isn't he related to that Senator from Massachusetts who should have been jailed long ago for murder or manslaughter? dxAce No. This guy's Schwarzenegger's cousin. |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:52:50 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: So, how bout' that Chertoff? Do you agree that by simply declaring a situation as an "Incident of National Significance," the feds should be allowed increased authority that could countermand the authority of a Governor? How about if the Governer resists it? As I understand it, the Governor retains control of civilian law enforcement and authority over any state's NG which have been sent to her for that purpose. No sane governor would say no to federal disaster relief. Chertoff is a bigger idiot than Bush or Brown. Apparently the only people in the Executive Branch following events were Bush's staff and they were afraid to tell him how bad it was. You're afraid all the time aren't you, 'tard boy? Tell me, are you open and honest with your therapist? Do you discuss your unfounded fears with him/her? Have any medications lessened the effects of your paranoia? dxAce Michigan USA |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:27:00 -0400, dxAce wrote: This RFK guy, isn't he related to that Senator from Massachusetts who should have been jailed long ago for murder or manslaughter? dxAce No. This guy's Schwarzenegger's cousin. Oh, OK. I thought he was part of that Kennedy crime ring out of Massachusetts. dxAce Michigan USA |
Steve Uhrig Court Documents September 14,2005 www.cryptome.org
homeland INsecurity.We Have Met The Enemy And He Is Us. cuhulin |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:55:40 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html HAHA. Right from Air America to Buzzflash. Once again the loony left trying to make something out of nothing. Floodwaters in NO polluted? No, really? Duh! The Bush-Condi ad in the lower left column is worth more than a passing glance. |
DaviD - What are 'you' and your Friends at Earth First
suggesting that "WE" Do with the City of New Orleans ? |
DaviD Declares - " No sane governor would say
no to federal disaster relief. " |
On 15 Sep 2005 07:02:50 -0700, "John S." wrote:
David wrote: http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html Not exactly hidden or being covered up. Every newspaper, newscast and radio broadcast I've had contact with has had something on the noxious soup of stuff that is in the streets, houses and bodies of water of New Orleans. It is one of many many problems to be addressed as the recover effort moves along. Directly related to the problem of what to do about pollution is the question of where New Orleand will get a supply of potable water that will allow this Crescent City rebirth the politicians are now talking about. It's a matter of downplaying how dangerous it is. The EPA said the WTC was safe when it was not. People from Lower Manhattan are getting sick. Rescue workers from the Pile are getting sick. |
Potable water is coming back more and more almost every day in the New
Orleans area.So says,the Big 870 WWL New Orleans radio talk show. cuhulin |
To H..L with fed govt.We gonna rebuild New Orleans anyway!
cuhulin |
The water came up and came up and came up and held for a longggg time
and then when it receded,, that is when the surge began.Mississippi Gulf Coast.JT and Dave. www.supertalkms.com cuhulin |
"David" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:14:48 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity* of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst. Opinion? Where do you see opinion? This is eyewitness testimony. ''Hugh Kauffman, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Environmental Protection Agency who specializes in emergency response, told Morning Sedition hosts Marc Maron and Mark Riley that a government cover-up is taking place right now, as we speak, to hide information about the dangerous toxins in the flood waters of the Gulf Coast region. Kauffman, a 35-year EPA veteran who has served in Republican and Democratic administrations, says that the Bush administration is preventing the EPA from releasing information that oil and chemical companies are mandated by law to provide. Kauffman says the Bush administration's cover-up is endangering residents and relief workers throughout the Gulf Coast region, who are being exposed to dangerous levels of toxins, some of which have been proven to cause cancer and birth defects. Kauffman, who was the chief investigator for the 9/11 clean up, also said that the Bush administration engaged in the same practice after 9/11-covering up the truth about the dangers in the air and water and lying to the public in the weeks after the disaster. Kauffman said that over 75% of the heroes who responded to 9/11 have gotten sick and in some cases have died because of exposure to toxins at Ground Zero, and that he fears a similar fate will befall relief workers and residents in the Gulf Coast now.'' Testimony? I dont see a single fact in this anywhere. |
You and Honus and m II sure do like to lie and say I mess around with my
little female dog though! If I had my way,y'all would NEVER see the light of day again!!! cuhulin |
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:02:16 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote: Testimony? I dont see a single fact in this anywhere. http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&t...hugh%20kaufman |
That goes for Les Locklear and Poppy too.
cuhulin |
David wrote: On 15 Sep 2005 07:02:50 -0700, "John S." wrote: David wrote: http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html Not exactly hidden or being covered up. Every newspaper, newscast and radio broadcast I've had contact with has had something on the noxious soup of stuff that is in the streets, houses and bodies of water of New Orleans. It is one of many many problems to be addressed as the recover effort moves along. Directly related to the problem of what to do about pollution is the question of where New Orleand will get a supply of potable water that will allow this Crescent City rebirth the politicians are now talking about. It's a matter of downplaying how dangerous it is. So it must be like doom... they should report the toxicity on a scale from 1-10. Or like you they could report it something like: "it's bad for you" or "it's really bad for you" or it's really, really bad for you", etc., etc. dxAce Michigan USA |
Mother Nature has a way of cleaning herself up.
cuhulin |
David wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:51:58 -0400, dxAce wrote: You're afraid all the time aren't you, 'tard boy? Tell me, are you open and honest with your therapist? Do you discuss your unfounded fears with him/her? Have any medications lessened the effects of your paranoia? dxAce It ain't paranoia if the threat is real. Exactly, 'tard boy, exactly. It is paranoia if the threat isn't real. Take those meds. dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com