Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 04:08 PM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !







  #2   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 05:57 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:08:01 -0700, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:


Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?

Meters times Megahertz equals 300.

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 06:24 PM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)






"David" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:08:01 -0700, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:


Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?

Meters times Megahertz equals 300.


Then why is 300 kilohertz and 3000 kilohertz termed Medium Wave ???

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !



  #4   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 07:02 PM
bpnjensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?

Because it is shorter than medium wave, which in turn is shorter than
long wave - back when these types of radio signals were the commonly
used wavelengths.

Of course, now with microwaves and picowaves, the name becomes much
less meaningful. In fact, the term H(igh) F(frequency), which seems to
have replaced SW for many purposes, is not really accurate either.

Bruce Jensen

  #5   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 07:13 PM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?


Because it is shorter than medium wave, which in turn is shorter than
long wave - back when these types of radio signals were the commonly
used wavelengths.

Of course, now with microwaves and picowaves, the name becomes much
less meaningful. In fact, the term H(igh) F(frequency), which seems to
have replaced SW for many purposes, is not really accurate either.

Bruce Jensen


Very good Bruce -- indeed it is an ancient term carried over to this very
day

From Wikipedia or google


Shortwave radio operates between the frequencies of 3,000 kHz and 30 MHz
(30,000 kHz) and came to be referred to as such in the early days of radio
because the wavelengths associated with this frequency range were shorter
than those commonly in use at that time. An alternate name is HF, or high
frequency.

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 07:21 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)



Caveat Lector wrote:

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?


Because it is shorter than medium wave, which in turn is shorter than
long wave - back when these types of radio signals were the commonly
used wavelengths.

Of course, now with microwaves and picowaves, the name becomes much
less meaningful. In fact, the term H(igh) F(frequency), which seems to
have replaced SW for many purposes, is not really accurate either.

Bruce Jensen


Very good Bruce -- indeed it is an ancient term carried over to this very
day

From Wikipedia or google

Shortwave radio operates between the frequencies of 3,000 kHz and 30 MHz
(30,000 kHz) and came to be referred to as such in the early days of radio
because the wavelengths associated with this frequency range were shorter
than those commonly in use at that time. An alternate name is HF, or high
frequency.


Some sources disagree on where shortwave begins. And, NASWA considers shortwave
to begin at 2000 kHz.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

  #7   Report Post  
Old October 5th 05, 08:00 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:21:26 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



Caveat Lector wrote:

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?

Because it is shorter than medium wave, which in turn is shorter than
long wave - back when these types of radio signals were the commonly
used wavelengths.

Of course, now with microwaves and picowaves, the name becomes much
less meaningful. In fact, the term H(igh) F(frequency), which seems to
have replaced SW for many purposes, is not really accurate either.

Bruce Jensen


Very good Bruce -- indeed it is an ancient term carried over to this very
day

From Wikipedia or google

Shortwave radio operates between the frequencies of 3,000 kHz and 30 MHz
(30,000 kHz) and came to be referred to as such in the early days of radio
because the wavelengths associated with this frequency range were shorter
than those commonly in use at that time. An alternate name is HF, or high
frequency.


Some sources disagree on where shortwave begins. And, NASWA considers shortwave
to begin at 2000 kHz.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

All FCC bands break on 3s.


  #8   Report Post  
Old October 6th 05, 12:26 AM
Tony Meloche
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

Caveat Lector wrote:
Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?



"Short" is relative. The "wave length" is the peak to peak (or
trough to trough) distance between the waveforms as they'd be seen on an
ocilliscope. "Shortwaves" are shorter waves than medium waves, which
are shorter waves than Longwaves. At the inception of the science,
"short" waves were the shortest type used (commonly) at that time.
Today, with cellphones and things using wavelengths that go with
gigahertz frequencies, "short" waves begin to look really long by
comparison.

Tony


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 6th 05, 12:36 AM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question Of The Day (on topic)

Very good Tony
Wikipedia sez

"Shortwave radio operates between the frequencies of 3,000 kHz and 30 MHz
(30,000 kHz) and came to be referred to as such in the early days of radio
because the wavelengths associated with this frequency range were shorter
than those commonly in use at that time. An alternate name is HF, or high
frequency.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_wave

As I recall the story At one time the bands below 200 meters were considered
worthless, so they gave the whole range to tha Amateurs
Soon they were sending signals across the atlantic

See 200 Meters and Down By Clinton B. DeSoto.
URL: http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?item=0011

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !






"Tony Meloche" wrote in message
...
Caveat Lector wrote:
Why is it termed "SHORT" WAVE ?



"Short" is relative. The "wave length" is the peak to peak (or trough
to trough) distance between the waveforms as they'd be seen on an
ocilliscope. "Shortwaves" are shorter waves than medium waves, which are
shorter waves than Longwaves. At the inception of the science, "short"
waves were the shortest type used (commonly) at that time. Today, with
cellphones and things using wavelengths that go with gigahertz
frequencies, "short" waves begin to look really long by comparison.

Tony


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radio Origins topic from March 13, Thanks to those who responded! [email protected] Shortwave 3 March 22nd 05 10:20 PM
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) Airy R.Bean Homebrew 20 February 22nd 05 07:04 PM
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) Airy R.Bean General 20 February 22nd 05 07:04 PM
Totaly Off topic question jeannette Digital 4 October 21st 03 05:11 PM
Totaly Off topic question jeannette Digital 0 October 21st 03 02:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017