Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 21st 05, 02:21 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default Better Signal-to-Noise Ratio from a Combination of Improvements including . . . a Ground

For One and All,

Better Signal-to-Noise Ratio from a Combination of Improvements
including . . . a Ground.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw...a/message/5961

What I generally 'see' as far as an "Improvement" of the
quality of the RF Signal getting to the Receiver is from a combination
of things.

1. The Wire Antenna Element is placed farther from the House.

2. A 'remote' Ground Rod is used : Again this Ground Rod
is planted in the ground farther away from the House.

3. Use of a Matching Transformer between the Wire Antenna
Element and the Coax Cable : Mounted the Matching Transformer
on the Ground Rod - if possible.

4. Use of a Coax Cable Feed-in-Line : Laying-On -or-
Buried-Under the Ground - if possible.

5. The Extra Mile - Use a well grounded Lightning Arrestor
and/or an In-Line 1:1 Isolation Transformer where the Coax
Cable leaves the Ground and enters the House.

NOTE - All the above is no good if you do not have a very well
Grounded Household Electrical System. Do This First !

RESULTS - Actually in most instances what I 'see' is a reduction
in the S-Meter reading : But I also "Hear" a Greater Reduction
of the Noise Level. Thus the Signal-to-Noise Radio 'improves'
and the Listenability of the RF Signal (Audio) is much Better.

BUT REMEMBER - YOUR PRIMARY USE OF A GROUND IS FOR IMPROVED ELECTRICAL
SAFETY AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION - USE IT [.]


i hope we are communicating - iane ~ RHF
.
.
.. .
= = = In ,
= = = "David G******" davidg******@c... wrote:

JHR Wrote:
"...... I do not mean to contradict you, but my personal
experience with several radios yield the conclusion that
grounding at any point has no effect on receiving.......
.....I just don't get it."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DAVE Wrote:
Neither do I. My experience is the same.
I have never witnessed a signal improvement from the use
of a variety of different RF grounds. It think it's
possible that once or twice I think I heard a small
reduction in noise.

I suspect that my house electrical system provides
sufficient ground to yield the maximum differential
between what's on my antenna and ground.
~ Dave
.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.
Tous Sont Bienvenus ! - - - Groupe par Radio
d'auditeur d'onde courte pour des Antennes de SWL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
Alle Sind Willkommen ! - - - Shortwave Radiozuhörer
Gruppe für SWL Antennen
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
Tutti Sono Benvenuti ! - - - Gruppo Radiofonico
dell'ascoltatore di onda corta per le Antenne di SWL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
Todos São Bem-vindos ! - - - Grupo de Rádio
do ouvinte do Shortwave para Antenas de SWL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
Все *адушны ! - - - Группа оператора на
приеме
коротковолнового диапазона Radio для
Aнтенн SWL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
¡Todos Son Agradables! - - - Grupo de Radio
del oyente de la onda corta para las Antenas de SWL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/
.
.
.. .

  #2   Report Post  
Old October 21st 05, 05:58 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Better Signal-to-Noise Ratio from a Combination of Improvements including . . . a Ground

For One and All,

For all and one...

Better Signal-to-Noise Ratio from a Combination of Improvements

including . . . a Ground.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw...a/message/5961


What I generally 'see' as far as an "Improvement" of the
quality of the RF Signal getting to the Receiver is from a combination
of things.

1. The Wire Antenna Element is placed farther from the House.


This can help if needed. Most of my antennas are over the house.

2. A 'remote' Ground Rod is used : Again this Ground Rod

is planted in the ground farther away from the House.

But again, this is only due to the incomplete antenna that
you are running in that case. "I assume the usual random wire of
whatever config"

3. Use of a Matching Transformer between the Wire Antenna

Element and the Coax Cable : Mounted the Matching Transformer
on the Ground Rod - if possible.

Again, this will almost always have zero effect on s/n ratio.
There is usually no lack of signal without the transformer.

4. Use of a Coax Cable Feed-in-Line : Laying-On -or-

Buried-Under the Ground - if possible.

You do not have to use coax to have low noise reception.
Ladder line can work just as well, if properly balanced.
Coax is just often more convenient, and easier to work with.
But ladder line can be just as quiet. If the coax is poorly
decoupled, it will be as noisy as any unbalanced ladder line.

5. The Extra Mile - Use a well grounded Lightning Arrestor

and/or an In-Line 1:1 Isolation Transformer where the Coax
Cable leaves the Ground and enters the House.

But what does this have to do with improving the s/n ratio?

NOTE - All the above is no good if you do not have a very well

Grounded Household Electrical System. Do This First !

I'm sorry, but this is pure hogwash. You *do not* need *any*
kind of a ground to have a good low noise receiving system.

RESULTS - Actually in most instances what I 'see' is a reduction

in the S-Meter reading : But I also "Hear" a Greater Reduction
of the Noise Level. Thus the Signal-to-Noise Radio 'improves'
and the Listenability of the RF Signal (Audio) is much Better.

Well, sure, you are decoupling the feedline in a better manner.
Ground wouldn't have anything to do with it, except you are using
ground as a method to decouple the feedline. You can decouple
the feedline just as well using other "non grounded" methods.
You are confusing a technique with the actual cure. The actual
cure is the decoupling of the line, not the ground. The ground is
just a method you are using to decouple the line.

BUT REMEMBER - YOUR PRIMARY USE OF A GROUND IS FOR IMPROVED ELECTRICAL

SAFETY AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION - USE IT [.]

I have no argument with this if those concerns are actual.
IE: My battery run IC-706 needs no safety ground. In that
case, it can be ignored.
But my older tube rigs do need to be safety grounded.
In that case, ignoring can be painful...
Most of my antennas are elevated, and my mast does take
strikes from time to time. I *do* have a well grounded mast
for a lightning return, and I have a ground bulkhead outside
my window to ground lines to in bad wx...
But still....Has nothing to do with improving s/n ratio.. :/

i hope we are communicating - iane ~ RHF


Your lips move, but I can't hear what you're sayin....
"optional Pink Floyd content" added as a bonus...
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla General 0 July 22nd 04 12:14 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Ten-tec vee beam Tom Coates Antenna 8 September 21st 03 12:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017