|
Bush sending troops to France!!!
i know it's not nice to poke fun, but they are the french. we saved
their ass twice. why should we do it again? i'm trying to be serious here...lol Drifter.. *on*the*fringe*of*Pittsburgh* start-here President Bush has authorized the Joint Chiefs to begin drawing up a battle plan to pull France's ass out of the fire again. Facing an apparent overwhelming force of up to 400 ****ed off teenagers Mr.Bush doubts France's ability to hold off the little ****ants. "Hell, if the last two world wars are any indication, I would expect France to surrender any day now", said Bush. Joint Chiefs head, Gen. Peter Pace, warned the President that it might be necessary to send up to 5 Marines to get things under control. The general admitted that 5 Marines may be overkill but he wanted to get this thing under control within 24 hours of arriving on scene. He stated he was having a hard time finding even one Marine to help those ungrateful *******s out for a third time but thought that he could persuade a few women Marines to do the job before they went on pregnancy leave. President Bush asked Gen. Pace to get our Marines out of there as soon as possible after order was restored. He also reminded Gen. Pace to make sure the Marines did not take soap, razors, or deodorant with them. The least they stand out the better. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
"Drifter" wrote in message ... i know it's not nice to poke fun, but they are the french. we saved their ass twice. why should we do it again? i'm trying to be serious here...lol Drifter.. Oh come on Drifter. Let's go help the slug eaters. hip hip hooray!!!!!!!!! BH |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Well,I told y'all a few days ago that if it gets to rough in Frogland
bush would send some Troops over there to straighten things out.It would be the same for Canada too.To the tune of that Jim Dandy to the Rescue song,,,, Uncle Sam to the Rescue. cuhulin |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Those surrender monkeys Frogs refused to let our U.S.Military Aircraft
fly over Frogland during Gulf War 1.It's came back to Burn them Frogs in their butts now.I say to HELL! with those Frogs!!! Let them BURN!!! cuhulin |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
|
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote: wrote: Well,I told y'all a few days ago that if it gets to rough in Frogland bush would send some Troops over there to straighten things out.It would be the same for Canada too.To the tune of that Jim Dandy to the Rescue song,,,, Uncle Sam to the Rescue. cuhulin Sort of how things are being straightened out in Iraq? You folks are just jealous because CanaDuh doesn't have the capability to straighten anything out. What would you do, throw hockey sticks and poutine at 'em? dxAce Michigan USA |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
The three stages of French warfa
1. Appeasement 2. Surrender 3. Collaboration |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
GIs fighting back.... :-D
http://www.cla.purdue.edu/WAAW/Asian...dachifig1.html -- Froggy Blackadder: There's something wrong with your fiancée, sir. Melchett: Oh my God, she's not Welsh, is she? (Blackadder Goes Forth) |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
To Heck with them Welsh barstids too! Not only are they just plain flat
out rude and ugly looking,(because that married Irish woman wayyyyy over yonder across the big pond once told me so) but they chickened out on helping William Wallace too.My mom long ago would once in a while call me Llewelyn,but my real name isn't Llewelyn.Sometimes I wonder why she called me that.I am Scotch Irish by Ancestry,I hope I am not part Welsh. cuhulin |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
I passed right by that American Embassy in Saigon many a time when I was
in Vietnam in 1964 driving them Duce and a halfs.I never had any reason to actually go in there though. cuhulin |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
|
Bush sending troops to France!!!
dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: wrote: Well,I told y'all a few days ago that if it gets to rough in Frogland bush would send some Troops over there to straighten things out.It would be the same for Canada too.To the tune of that Jim Dandy to the Rescue song,,,, Uncle Sam to the Rescue. cuhulin Sort of how things are being straightened out in Iraq? You folks are just jealous because CanaDuh doesn't have the capability to straighten anything out. What would you do, throw hockey sticks and poutine at 'em? dxAce Michigan USA It was brilliant strategy to throw bombs and bullets in Iraq and create a terrorist state. You fools created a far worse monster than the one that was in there. Nice going, Dr. FrankenUSAstein! JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: wrote: Well,I told y'all a few days ago that if it gets to rough in Frogland bush would send some Troops over there to straighten things out.It would be the same for Canada too.To the tune of that Jim Dandy to the Rescue song,,,, Uncle Sam to the Rescue. cuhulin Sort of how things are being straightened out in Iraq? You folks are just jealous because CanaDuh doesn't have the capability to straighten anything out. What would you do, throw hockey sticks and poutine at 'em? dxAce Michigan USA It was brilliant strategy to throw bombs and bullets in Iraq and create a terrorist state. You fools created a far worse monster than the one that was in there. Nice going, Dr. FrankenUSAstein! Thanks for your diagnosis, Dr. CanaDork. Is malpractice your speciality? dxAce Michigan USA |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. In that case they might just erect a memorial to honour all of CanaDuh. Dumbass Canucks, what'll they think of next. dxAce Michigan USA |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:14:43 -0800, Cmdr Buzz Corey
wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Haha....why does that not surprise me? Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, Peter Wieck, David David (call me at home) Stinson, Steven Dinius, Ken G Sylvain Vanier, Honus, John(I make love to animals more than you think)BarnYard, M |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Beerbarrel wrote:
At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. God knows what you'll be like when you withdraw from Iraq and have nothing to show for it. Must suck to be you to not have a country full of red, white and blue automatons. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
dxAce wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. In that case they might just erect a memorial to honour all of CanaDuh. Dumbass Canucks, what'll they think of next. dxAce Michigan USA I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
MnMikew wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... It was brilliant strategy to throw bombs and bullets in Iraq and create a terrorist state. You fools created a far worse monster than the one that was in there. You're right, and your solution is...................................... A non-existent problem doesn't require a solution. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote:
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Must suck to be you to not have a country full of red, white and blue automatons. We've got one of those just north. They're all socialists, so they believe their politics makes them free spirits. Pretty soon now their socialized medical care will kill 'em all off, and the land will be abandoned for decades until the Queen starts a prison colony there. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. ************************************************** ********************** for you guys whao wouldn't know, the "Traveling Wall" is in Toronto this week. to honor the Canadian Viet Nam Vets. living and dead. Drifter... *on*the*fringe*of*Pittsburgh* |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Beerbarrel wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:36:18 GMT, John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. In that case they might just erect a memorial to honour all of CanaDuh. Dumbass Canucks, what'll they think of next. dxAce Michigan USA I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. JB Go for it Nanacy! Quite trying to change your middle name! Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Drifter wrote: I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. ************************************************** ********************** for you guys whao wouldn't know, the "Traveling Wall" is in Toronto this week. to honor the Canadian Viet Nam Vets. living and dead. Drifter... *on*the*fringe*of*Pittsburgh* Good point. Approximately 30000 Canadians enlisted to fight in the US forces. The CBC aired a program way back in 1986 on this topic. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Beerbarrel wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:34:47 GMT, John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. God knows what you'll be like when you withdraw from Iraq and have nothing to show for it. Must suck to be you to not have a country full of red, white and blue automatons. JB What sucks is sharing a border with you nancy! Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, So you plan of going from suck to blow when, Tracy Nancy Fort? JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Strictly on a President/party basis, the Republicans have been in power longer than the Democrats since 1975. You may want to revise your statement. Must suck to be you to not have a country full of red, white and blue automatons. We've got one of those just north. They're all socialists, so they believe their politics makes them free spirits. Pretty soon now their socialized medical care will kill 'em all off, and the land will be abandoned for decades until the Queen starts a prison colony there. Check the link that I posted awhile back concerning Canada/USA preventable medical deaths. Your system still manages to kill off more than our system does. Both countries need to take some action on this issue. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Worst president Ever? You Might Be Supprised. www.rense.com
The WORST president Ever was lincoln. cuhulin |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote: Drifter wrote: I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. ************************************************** ********************** for you guys whao wouldn't know, the "Traveling Wall" is in Toronto this week. to honor the Canadian Viet Nam Vets. living and dead. Drifter... *on*the*fringe*of*Pittsburgh* Good point. Approximately 30000 Canadians enlisted to fight in the US forces. The CBC aired a program way back in 1986 on this topic. A lot of them may have done so in order to get US citizenship and then got the hell out of CanaDuh. dxAce Michigan USA |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote:
Check the link that I posted awhile back concerning Canada/USA preventable medical deaths. Your system still manages to kill off more than our system does. Both countries need to take some action on this issue. Sadly, our infant mortality rate is approximately twice as bad as that in Cuba. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:36:51 GMT, John Barnard wrote:
Beerbarrel wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:36:18 GMT, John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. In that case they might just erect a memorial to honour all of CanaDuh. Dumbass Canucks, what'll they think of next. dxAce Michigan USA I'm sure that we can erect the One-Finger Memorial for you and Swish. JB Go for it Nanacy! Quite trying to change your middle name! Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, JB whatever you say Nancy! Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:42:30 GMT, John Barnard wrote:
Beerbarrel wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:34:47 GMT, John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Beerbarrel wrote: At least when went, unlike our sissy neighbors to the north. It is really embarrassing living next to a country of cowards. I thinks that it is time to attack Canada and send the survivors to Iraq, all 2 of them. Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. God knows what you'll be like when you withdraw from Iraq and have nothing to show for it. Must suck to be you to not have a country full of red, white and blue automatons. JB What sucks is sharing a border with you nancy! Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, So you plan of going from suck to blow when, Tracy Nancy Fort? JB Whatever you say Nancy...... Usenet'Hole List --------------------------------- chicken little and his mom!, |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
Carter-K8VT wrote: John Barnard wrote: Check the link that I posted awhile back concerning Canada/USA preventable medical deaths. Your system still manages to kill off more than our system does. Both countries need to take some action on this issue. Sadly, our infant mortality rate is approximately twice as bad as that in Cuba. I was in Cuba of January this year. The people are remarkably inventive and resourceful. Some of those 1950's cars that they somehow manage to maintain - way too cool! I' m glad that I had the chance to get to visit before the hurricane season. They have a very good medical system and quite the number of well-trained specialists and their doctors are in big demand in that part of the world. I've seen various reasons as to why the USA has a relatively high (for a first world country) infant mortality rate. Some say it's due to less than adequate universal health care, some say it's due to the high number of Cesarean births, or it may be due to the use of drugs to induce labour and so on. In all likelihood it's a combination of all those reasons. Part of the problem is the "drugs for everything" mentality of Big Pharma. Unfortunately, this leads to the "thalidomides" and the "vioxxes" of the world. Lifestyle management (diet, exercise, etc.) tends to get tossed by the wayside when pills are available. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote:
clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Strictly on a President/party basis, the Republicans have been in power longer than the Democrats since 1975. You may want to revise your statement. President only doesn't count. Too many of those years, a Democratic Congress stifled every move the president wanted to make. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... I've seen various reasons as to why the USA has a relatively high (for a first world country) infant mortality rate. Some say it's due to less than adequate universal health care, some say it's due to the high number of Cesarean births, or it may be due to the use of drugs to induce labour and so on. In all likelihood it's a combination of all those reasons. Part of the problem is the "drugs for everything" mentality of Big Pharma. Unfortunately, this leads to the "thalidomides" and the "vioxxes" of the world. Lifestyle management (diet, exercise, etc.) tends to get tossed by the wayside when pills are available. I think drugs have much to do with the higher than normal infant mortality rate in the US.. but not the ones from pharmaceutical companies. I suspect that it's high drug use among women of child bearing age (along with smoking, drinking, etc. during pregnancy.) Certainly smoking, drinking and illicit drugs contribute to the infant mortality profile. Pain killers, sedatives, anti-depressants, tranquilizers and so forth are consumed in very large quantities and there is no such thing as a drug without side effects. Very, very, very few drugs get tested on pregnant women primarily due to concern with damage to the fetus. Is it true that the three countries in the world where it's against the law for a doctor to open a private practice are Cuba, North Korea and CanaDuh? I heard that on the radio fairly recently. dxAce Michigan USA Were you listening to Pat Robertson, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Buchanan or the voices in your head? If so, they were well off the mark if they lumped Canada in with the other 2 countries. At any rate all three are pretty Socialist. Run along and try to sharpen those listening skills, Dr. CanaDork. dxAce Michigan USA D-Ex-Ace Quisling, Have you learned to do a proper Google search on someone yet? You are a wealth of disinformation. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Strictly on a President/party basis, the Republicans have been in power longer than the Democrats since 1975. You may want to revise your statement. President only doesn't count. Too many of those years, a Democratic Congress stifled every move the president wanted to make. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. I suppose that the Presidential veto doesn't count for anything. Nixon had 43 total vetoes and 7 were overridden, Ford had 66 and 12 were overridden, Carter had 31 and 2 were overridden, Reagan had 78 and 9 were overrideen, Bush I had 44 (and 2 pocket vetoes which weren't counted in the totals as they were tried between sessions) and 1 were overridden and Clinton had 38 vetoes and 2 were overridden. In other words, the Presidents had an effective hand in suppressing things that they didn't like. You need to study our system a bit more. The party in power can see to it that proposed legislation never even makes it out of committee to receive a vote. Hit the books, Dr. CanaDork. dxAce Michigan USA D-Ex-Ace Quisling, So give me some numbers to show how often proposed legislation never makes it out of committee to receive a vote. Heck, you know so much about the USofA, I figured you'd have those figures right to hand, Dr. CanaDork. dxAce Michigan USA D-Ex-Ace Quisling, Why am I not suprised that taxed your meager abilities. You spout off so much disinformation these days that it makes me wonder how much listlogging you like to do. JB |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
|
Bush sending troops to France!!!
|
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote:
dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Strictly on a President/party basis, the Republicans have been in power longer than the Democrats since 1975. You may want to revise your statement. President only doesn't count. Too many of those years, a Democratic Congress stifled every move the president wanted to make. I suppose that the Presidential veto doesn't count for anything. Nixon had 43 total vetoes and 7 were overridden, Ford had 66 and 12 were overridden, Carter had 31 and 2 were overridden, Reagan had 78 and 9 were overrideen, Bush I had 44 (and 2 pocket vetoes which weren't counted in the totals as they were tried between sessions) and 1 were overridden and Clinton had 38 vetoes and 2 were overridden. In other words, the Presidents had an effective hand in suppressing things that they didn't like. You need to study our system a bit more. The party in power can see to it that proposed legislation never even makes it out of committee to receive a vote. So give me some numbers to show how often proposed legislation never makes it out of committee to receive a vote. When the Dems controlled Congress, it was a daily matter. Repubs back then complained to anyone who'd listen that they couldn't even get a bill to the floor. The only times they'd get a hearing is when some maverick Dem needed some logrolling, and often their bills were sent to die in committee. Don't forget there are times when a veto is a fool's errand, too. When it's obvious the Congress is bent on something, a presidential veto becomes nothing more than a way to commit political suicide. I vaguely remember a recent (i.e. last ten years) example, but the circumstances don't come to mind. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
Bush sending troops to France!!!
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: clifto wrote: John Barnard wrote: Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Saw on TV where the Canadians want to erect a memorial to honor the cowards from the US who ran up there during the Viet Nam war. Way to go CanaDUH, nothing like honoring cowards. Too bad the USA went a little crazy after that losing that war. That's pretty much because right after we lost that war, the leftists were able to move into power. Strictly on a President/party basis, the Republicans have been in power longer than the Democrats since 1975. You may want to revise your statement. President only doesn't count. Too many of those years, a Democratic Congress stifled every move the president wanted to make. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. I suppose that the Presidential veto doesn't count for anything. Nixon had 43 total vetoes and 7 were overridden, Ford had 66 and 12 were overridden, Carter had 31 and 2 were overridden, Reagan had 78 and 9 were overrideen, Bush I had 44 (and 2 pocket vetoes which weren't counted in the totals as they were tried between sessions) and 1 were overridden and Clinton had 38 vetoes and 2 were overridden. In other words, the Presidents had an effective hand in suppressing things that they didn't like. You need to study our system a bit more. The party in power can see to it that proposed legislation never even makes it out of committee to receive a vote. Hit the books, Dr. CanaDork. dxAce Michigan USA D-Ex-Ace Quisling, So give me some numbers to show how often proposed legislation never makes it out of committee to receive a vote. Heck, you know so much about the USofA, I figured you'd have those figures right to hand, Dr. CanaDork. dxAce Michigan USA D-Ex-Ace Quisling, Why am I not suprised that taxed your meager abilities. You spout off so much disinformation these days that it makes me wonder how much listlogging you like to do. Not a bit. You? LMAO The CanaDork has been reduced to accusing me of listlogging. LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com