Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:07:57 GMT, "Frank Dresser"
wrote: "matt weber" wrote in message .. . What breakthrough has made single conversion so state of the art? Absolutle nothing, in fact single conversion sucks unless it is an up conversion, and even then, mixer noise will wipe out reception above about 10Mhz absent a good tuned RF amplifier in front. Why would up conversion mixer noise wipe out reception above 10 MHz? How would the presumed mixer noise problem be fixed by a further conversion? The bind is in many low end receiver designs, the mixer is also the local oscillator, so most SW receivers that are variants of the All America 5 design (and there were many) had very poor performance above 10Mhz or so. Of course providing 3-5 Khz selectivity at 40Mhz tends to be a bit challenging. Q on the order of 10,000...... Single Conversion with a 455khz IF strip doesn't have problems with bandwidth, but image rejection in the SW bands sucks big time. That's true enough with inexpensive receivers which relied on a single (de)tuned circuit for RF selectivity. But the better receivers would cascade two or more tuned stages, isolated with RF amplifiers. Actually most interesting design in a single conversion receiver I think I ever was was in the mid 1960's Squires-Saunders built one with a tuned RF stage with a Q muliplier on it, so they had a Q of a couple thousand on the front end and made a killing on the gain as a result of gain-bandwidth product. Suffices to say that with that sort of front end selectivity, image rejection wasn't a problem. Obviously impedance matching with the antenna was crucial to performance, but it was undoubtedly the best single conversion HF receiver every commercially built (and had a price tag to match). Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|