|
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:14:40 -0500, "Howard C. Berkowitz"
wrote: In article , Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. I'm interested in qualified scientific studies in this area. Have you any citations? http://www.thefourreasons.org/duresources.htm |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
The Pentagon's Plans to invade Venezuela. www.rense.com
Chavez is right,bush is crazy.So is cheney and the Pentagon. cuhulin |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: In article , David wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:14:40 -0500, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: In article , Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. I'm interested in qualified scientific studies in this area. Have you any citations? http://www.thefourreasons.org/duresources.htm I'm afraid I was looking for recent studies from peer-reviewed medical journals or conferences, or at least from research centers that published the detailed experiements. This seems to be a bibliography at a partisan site. The 'tard boy Rickets posts a lot of flawed material. dxAce Michigan USA |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. This is someting I've been trying to follow. Can you offer a poiner to a study or a sory about it? Failing that, do you know how long between exposure and measuring the DU in the system? |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
Depleted Uranium Tank Ammunition sharpens upon impact and also self
ignites (very high heat) causing atomized particles which carry far and wide in the air and that stuff gets into body tissues and body organs and lungs.There are some Depleted Uranium contaminated Tanks in Kansas sitting out in open areas and kids have been playing on those Tanks.I think it was at www.rense.com (scroll down the middle isle at rense.com) where I read an article about that earlier this week. cuhulin |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
What's that rto mean?
cuhulin |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
I see you use gmail.
cuhulin |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
www.devilfinder.com What happens upon impact of depleted uranium
tank shells? You should get in touch with Dr.Joyce Riley.She can tell you all about depleted uranium. cuhulin |
US admits use of white phosphorous against people in Iraq
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:17:45 -0500, "Howard C. Berkowitz"
wrote: In article , David wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:14:40 -0500, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: In article , Carter-K8VT wrote: wrote: DU does not atomize. That was the original thinking. Studies have since shown that DU particles become small enough to become wind borne and have been found up to 25 miles from the impact site. Recent research suggests that the particles of DU when pulverized by such actions a armor impacts are too large to be retained in the human body for any appreciable time and will be rejected. If so, there is little or no danger that DU will build up in a human even with repeated exposures. Also not true. The latest studies *have* found significant amounts of DU retained in humans. I'm interested in qualified scientific studies in this area. Have you any citations? http://www.thefourreasons.org/duresources.htm I'm afraid I was looking for recent studies from peer-reviewed medical journals or conferences, or at least from research centers that published the detailed experiements. This seems to be a bibliography at a partisan site. Here you go. Peer review to your heart's content: http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiatio.../en/index.html |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com