![]() |
The In-the-Attic Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna - Just may be the better choice to fill the available space.
One thing you have to remember about the arguments between various antenna
types; dipoles, longwires, yagi's. etc. These are all "tuned" antennas (even a random longwire) and their maximum gain is only evident in a single band. While a large horizontal loop of "one wave" in length (example: 80 meters circumference = one wavelength at 3.5MHz) will perform equally to a "half wave" dipole (i.e. 40 meters long) AT THE SAME HEIGHT. Where the large horizontal loop shines is at all frequencies about its "one wave" length. The large horizontal loop of a theoretical length of 80 meters in circumference will exhibit the characteristics of a dipole at ANY frequency above 3.5MHz. Whereas a halfwave dipole will only exhibit equal performance at 3.5MHz and its multiples (i.e. 7MHz, 14MHz, 21MHz). Everywhere else the dipole will exhibit a loss compared to a large horizontal loop. The characteristics of our theoretical 80 meter large horizontal loop are "relatively" flat all through the spectrum with much less peaks or valleys compared to a dipole all the way up to at least 30MHz. It is the ideal antenna for general SWL and HF utility monitoring because its performance is equal all across the shortwave spectrum. Consider its performance similar to a UHF/VHF discone antenna. It exhibits a flat response, no gain or loss (relative to a half-wave vertical), from 50-900MHz! That is about 1000MHz! - that is very "broadbanded." "RHF" wrote in message ups.com... MK - By Definition "In-the-Attic" In-the-Attic = Limited Space and Antenna Size In-the-Attic = Usually means that the Wire Antenna Element is 12 Feet to 18 Feet High above AGL for a single story house. Maybe twice that for a two story house or split-level condo. NOTE - For a Shortwave Listener's (SWL) "Receive Only" Antenna that is designed to "Fill" the Available Space : Whether these Antennas are : a Random Wire; a Dipole, or a Loop they are not "Cut' for any specific Wave Length and Frequency; they are simply Random Wire Antennas IN-THE-ATTIC AND ATTIC SIZE : In a 30 Foot by 40 Foot size Attic a basic straight Random Wire Antenna can be 30 Feet along the short side; 40 Feet along a the long side; or 50 Feet across a the diagonal. In a 30 Foot by 40 Foot size Attic a simple straight Wire Dipole Antenna can be 30 Feet along the short side; 40 Feet along a the long side; or 50 Feet across a the diagonal. In a 30 Foot by 40 Foot size Attic a common Wire Loop Antenna would be : 30 Feet along one short side; 40 Feet along one the long side; 30 Feet along the other short side; 40 Feet along the other long side; for a total of 140 Feet around the Attic [.] MK - It should be self-evident that " there is simply more Wire in the Air. " and that is all I said and meant to say. RELATIVE ANTENNA NOISE : " Equally as low Noise due to the natural properties of a Loop. " The usual ascertion is that a Dipole Antenna has a Lower Noise Factor (Property) then the same Length Random Wire at the same Height; all other things being equal : Balun / No Balun; Coax Cable / Twin Lead / Ladder Line; ETC. The Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna has the same Lower Noise Factor (Property) then the Dipole Antenna has in the same relative Available "In-the-Attic" Space : All other things being equal : Balun / No Balun; Coax Cable / Twin Lead / Ladder Line; ETC. There is Nothing to be gained or lost by using the Dipole or Loop Antenna in the Attic Noise Wise : But with the Loop Antenna more Wire is in the Air which can result in more Signal from the Antenna. ANTENNA APERTURE : RHF Said - " Greater Antenna Aperture {Signal Capture Area} due to the natural shape and size of a Loop in any given space; with less apparent signal fading. " MK - You model two 80 Meter Band Antennas; a Half-Wave Dipole Antenna and a Full-Wave Horizontal Loop Antenna and say that they are the same with little measurable difference between the two. "OK" Again here my beginning point is "In-the-Attic" were both the Dipole Antenna and the Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna are using the same Available Space and are in fact simply two 'random wire' antennas that happen to be laid-out in the confines of the Attic. Here the 50 Foot long Dipole Antenna with lets say 50 Square Foot of Signal Capture Area has less potential as an Antenna : Then the 140 Foot long Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna with lets say 120 Square Foot of Signal Capture Area that has more potential as an Antenna. To my simple way of thinking relative size and area does matter. ? Now is this Theoretically or Machine Measurable - Most Likely. ? Now is this Discernable by the Shortwave Listener (SWL) - Maybe. THE CRAP SHOOT : MK you say : "Basically, it's a crap shoot." "I run the dipoles." RHF says : For an In-the-Attic Antenna "Crap Shoot" I prefer the Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna - It's a matter of choice. MY INTUITIVE STATEMENT ABOUT VERTICAL LOOP ANTENNAS : RHF Said - " Intuitively I would think that for a Vertical Loop Antenna to perform up to its potential the maximum Length-to-Height (Aspect) Ratio would be about 4:1 or 5:1 ." Again here my beginning point is "In-the-Attic" most every Attics that I have been in is Longer and Wider then they are High {Tall}. So 'if' we are trying to Maximizing the Size of the Vertical Loop Antenna then a simple Circle or Square would not produce as much Wire Length and Combined Area as a Rectangle or Triangle using up the Available Space inside the Attic. The added comment about the Length-to-Height (Aspect) Ratio being about 4:1 or 5:1 was to not have the Vertical Loop become to flat compressed and effectively become a fat Folded Dipole Antenna of sorts. RESTATING MY CONCLUSIONS {NON-TECHNICAL OPINIONS} : For a "Receiver Only" Antenna being used by a Shortwave Listener (SWL) The Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna used In-the-Attic may/could/should perform better then the simple Dipole Antenna with potentially Higher Signal Levels; the same relative Noise Level; and less apparent Fading. STAYING ON MESSAGE - THIS CONVERSATION : MK - You appear to be a "Technical Person" and that is well and good. However, I am for the most part a non-technical person who simply tries to Keep It Simple And Practical [KISAP]. For me these Conversations can be an interesting exercise in restating my simple minded opinions : But for you these Conversations may turn out to be an exercise in futility - a Fools Errant so to speak. MK - Part of my 'iane' signature { I Ain't No Elmer } Means : I Don't Get Techincal - Because - I simply am not smart enough to try and WOW anyone with the all that math or science. MK - I Am Glad We Had This Talk :o) kisap - keeping it simple and practical ~ iane ~ RHF . All are WELCOME and "Invited to Join" the Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antenna eGroup on YAHOO ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/ SWL ANTENNAS GROUP = http://tinyurl.com/an6tw . Some Say: On A Clear Day You Can See Forever. I Believe : On A Clear Night You Can Hear Forever . . . and Beyond , , , The BEYOND ! ! ! With a Shortwave Listening Antenna of your own making. "If You Build It {SWL Antenna} You Will Hear Them !" http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/ SWL ANTENNAS GROUP = http://tinyurl.com/an6tw . . . . . |
The In-the-Attic Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna - Just may be the better choice to fill the available space.
SED,
Thank You for the Reply and Sharing this Info concerning the characteristics of the Dipole Antenna verses the Loop Antenna. May we all Learn something new each day; and re-learn something anew all over again everyday :o) - iane ~ RHF |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com