Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Measuring filter shape factor
The distortion analyzer has a tracking bandpass filter. I'm using the
HP8903E, but for this purpose, even the 334B would do the trick. You can use the analyzer to display the signal level of the sine wave inpedentent of noise to the degree the bandpass filter can remove it. [The 8903E reads amplitude, distortion, and frequency.] I never reached the -60db point, because the signal was lost in the noise. But you have to ask yourself, if the signal is in the noise, you do care about the rejection? In the dark ages, I was designing switched capacitor filters for modem products. When you sold the chip as a Bell standard filter, you had to implement that exact filter. However, the reality was the noise floor and THD totally negated the effectiveness of the filter. [Power supply rejection is a factor too.] So yeah, I could attenuate the alternate (out of band) channel, but the filter noise was more significant than what I was attenuating. Once the product became integrated, nobody could see the filter implementation. The amount of filtering was reduced to a level where the alternate channel (out of band) signal level was minimum by picking a compromise between the number of poles of filtering and the noise level of the amplifiers. Less poles of filtering meant fewer all passes were required. Now I'm not happy the noise floor of the radio crapped out at around -45db. I don't know if measuring at the line outputs would have been better. I need to do the measurement again. It is quite possible that you can use your sound card to measure the amplitude of the signal independent of the noise. BTW, I should have mentioned I turned on the 1khz modulation on the RF signal generator. My goal was to test a crystal filter I picked up at the flea market and installed in my radio. [A good deal at $10.] One thing I learned is the coupling capacitors make a difference in terms of the signal level. I'd have to open the radio to see what I used, but I recall if the caps were too small, the signal level was attenuated. Michael Thorpe wrote: On 11 Jan 2006 14:14:01 -0800, wrote: http://www.lazygranch.com/images/radio/cwfilter.gif I did this test as follows: 1) radio in AM 2) AGC turned off 3) RF generator connector to antenna input 4) distortion analyzer connected to earphone output Pick a frequency. I used 10Mhz. Set the RF generator and radio to that frequency. Leave the radio dial alone. Sweep the RF generator manually and measure the audio level from the distortion analyser. Plot the results. This was a crystal filter, so you will need a RF generator with 1Hz steps. This is an in-situ measurement, i.e. this is not the same as just testing the IF filter by itself. You need the distortion analyzer to get the audio signal level independent from the noise. Many thanks, this is interesting. What I am still unsure about is how you determine the -6dB and -60dB points using the distortion analyzer: When you say "measure the audio level", what exactly do you measure, the audio signal fundamental (i.e. filtered at the modulation frequency)? So in fact you are only using the distortion analyzer to filter the audio and to measure the level? I don't have a distortion analyzer, but I guess I could simply use an oscilloscope or an audio spectrum analyzer (PC sound card based). Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
F.S. More Good Stuff | Boatanchors | |||
F.S. More good stuff. | Swap | |||
F.S. Radio / Books & Stuff | Boatanchors | |||
F.S. Radio / Books & Stuff | Swap | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Homebrew |