Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Frank Dresser wrote: During the time both stations were testing, there were times in which both WBBM and WSCR were both running IBOC at the same time and times in which they were running IBOC alternately. I didn't think about it much at the time, but I now wonder if they were trying to get both IBOC channels broadcasting off the same antenna. Frank Dresser Not likely. IBOC requires a particularly broad, even spectrum off the antenna. AM antennae, though broader than comm antennae, are still frequency specific. Stations of such disparate frequencies would be hard pressed to meet the flat response required by IBOC on both stations if combined into a single antenna. That's not to say it can't be done. But the cost of doing so, and for experimentation at that, would be far outside BlackRock's capital budget caps. Not to mention the potential power/pattern repercussions once the CP was filed. Modification of existing physical plant could open the door to counter filings, potential protracted legal battles, and even challenges to existing licenses/operating parameters. As boneheaded as CBS Radio has been around here in the last 8 months, even THEY aren't that stupid. Then, again......... Large numbers of stations in metro areas are already sharing antenna systems. Most have done this either in order to decrease the number of physical plants or to simply save on leasing of or purchase of land for antenna systems. The towers themselves are only truly narrowband at resonance. When two (or even more) transmitters share a system, at most one of them will be at resonance. As far as the matching hardware, it can be engineered to be as broad as it needs to be. Antennas can have a broader response by increasing the diameter of the vertical radiator. This can be done by running at least three wires around the tower 120 degrees apart with a ring connecting them together top and bottom minimum. This is much cheaper than constructing a larger diameter tower. Increasing radiator diameter to broaden the response is a general rule that can be applied to most antennas. FM systems share antennae all the time. AM's though, not so much. To materially change the system, would require a CP which would open the installation to challenge. This is particularly true of modifying existing AM's to share common antennnae. Even omni's. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC and True Bilingualism | Shortwave | |||
Here is "Why" I am 'skeptical' about DRM and IBOC | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting |