Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:17:33 -0500, "Robert11"
wrote: Hello: Would like to get your opinions on this: Will be putting up an Inverted-L receiving only antenna, like the PAR EF-SWL in a few weeks. The end point of the downward vertical leg will have a Balun, which I plan on grounding to a 6 foot or so 3/4 inch Cu water pipe driven into the ground at that point. From there, I will have about a 25 foot run of coax (buried about 6 inches deep) back to the house. If I put the lightning arrester next to the Balun, and use the same ground rod, will that be acceptable, or should it really be placed right where the coax starts to enter the house ? Would like to avoid having to drive another ground rod in, and also having another break in the coax. I realize that right next to the house is probably better practice for the arrester location, but do you think it would really matter for any induced high volt emf pulse that the antenna might be subjected to (as the coax run will be buried) ? B. If your lightning arrestor isn't installed according to the NEC your fire insurance may be no good. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM radio reception inside passenger planes? | Antenna | |||
Lightning Arrester Brand: Which ? | Shortwave | |||
FYI: NOAA Lightning Safety Awareness Week | Policy | |||
Lightning Arrester | Antenna | |||
stuff for all hams | General |