Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... If your above statements are based on "facts," I'll stick with Brenda-Ann's view any time. Brenda-Ann talked about engineering standards and physics... but we know marketing is the ultimate law in the universe, not the laws of nature. No, Brenda Ann spoke about engineering standards that are outdated and arcane. Interference on first adjacents is irrelevant if nobody in the interference zone listens to first adjacents. The principles of physics do not change. It is the way radio is used that has changed, and there are more than a few Luddites here trying to bring back things that died decades ago. Good engineering doesn't become outdated, it simply gets ignored. Listeners are not irrelevant just because they may stand outside the 'market area'. It used to be that if a station was being interfered with, one could complain to the FCC and the interference would be cleared up. That seems to no longer be the case. And what of portable radios, of which there are many millions? Many of these tend to have very wide IF bandpass (some don't even use IF stages anymore, and instead broadband amplify the signal), and will therefore be susceptible to cochannel interference from the station that the listener is trying to listen TO. Add to this that FM AFC will try to lock onto strong second or third adjacent channels that are spilling over because of IBOC. I know people living IN New York City that receive interference from IBOC stations on stations they regularly listen to. This is on both AM and FM IBOC. This whole thing was ill thought-out, at best. It's as much a boondoggle (perhaps even moreso) than HDTV.. Most stations don't even run more than a meager percentage of HD programming, opting instead to run 720i on their main channel so that they can run extra programming to make more money.. I don't care what you or anyone else tries to say to blow smoke up my arse, 720i does NOT look as good as standard NTSC analog. HD does look nice, when you're in a signal area high enough to make use of it. Once you get outside of a large city, at least where I'm from, if you get far outside of Portland, digital is just not receivable. I'll take a bit of snow or a minor ghost over a nice blue screen any day, thank you. And again, what about all the millions of portable televisions that DTV will positively make worthless overnight? Is the government going to give us all tiny convertor boxes so that we can still use those, too? For many, those portable sets represent a larger expenditure than their living room televisions, just because of the difference in technology used to build them. Maybe us Luddites just don't like the government, or a bunch of stuffed shirt pencil pushers, telling us what's good for us? Hmmmmm. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Why I Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |