![]() |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
|
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Interesting. The data sheet refers to the 'base loading assembly' which does not surprise me - was almost thinking of it like a 10 - 12 meter 5/8 wave except it has no radials. I think I'll let somebody else try it and read their comments on it's performance; for some reason it reminds me of the adage "if something seems to good to be true......." |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
And it comes with a U bolt too.For three times that money you can buy a
Wellbrook Antenna which I think would be a much better buy. cuhulin |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
In article .com,
"Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Sounds pricey for a 6 foot vertical whip antenna. You could get a CB vertical whip for a lot less I think. Here is your mobile CB 102 inch long steel whip (8.5 foot) for $20 plus $2 for shipping and handling. http://www.gijoesradioelectronics.com/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=41 -- Telamon Ventura, California |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
David wrote: On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? Why don't you read the spec sheet and find out? dxAce Michigan USA |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html vertically polarized, so it will pick up more man made noise than a horizontally polarized antenna, in spite of the ad copy's protestation. bob k5qwg |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:33:43 GMT, David wrote:
On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? Another way of saying it's not an amplified, "active" antenna. bob k5qwg |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:38:53 -0500, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? Why don't you read the spec sheet and find out? I did, ****wad. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:42:48 GMT, Bob Miller
wrote: On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:33:43 GMT, David wrote: On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? Another way of saying it's not an amplified, "active" antenna. Thanks, Mister Wizard. I already knew that. Why would anyone pay $110 for a 6 foot passive antenna? better? |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
David wrote: On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:38:53 -0500, dxAce wrote: David wrote: On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html Passive? Why don't you read the spec sheet and find out? I did, ****wad. That's Mr. ****wad, junkie. dxAce Michigan USA |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
Don't be so cranky! It's not his fault your a Junky with Hepatitis C
virus slowly gnawing away at your liver. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
"Bob Miller" wrote in message ... On 10 Mar 2006 21:42:59 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html vertically polarized, so it will pick up more man made noise than a horizontally polarized antenna, in spite of the ad copy's protestation. bob k5qwg And even worse, without a ground, the outer shield becomes part of the antenna allowing noise p/u from inside the home, negating the advantage of an outdoor mounting. Dale W4OP |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 09:18:15 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Don't be so cranky! It's not his fault your a Junky with Hepatitis C virus slowly gnawing away at your liver. Not a junkie. Got no virus. Liver 100% A-OK. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
Uh huh...
From: Dave - view profile Date: Sun, Nov 24 2002 4:21 pm Email: Dave Groups: alt.support.hepatitis-c Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author I smoked one little crumb of the good **** every night throughout my treatment. Undetectable at 24 weeks and for 2 years since. I told my doctor I was going to do this and she just rolled her eyes and said nothing. A positive attitude and GQOL are essential to succesful treatment. On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:51:15 GMT, "ssb" wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What are the pro's for those with HepC, and do they out weight the negetives? rbh |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 10:21:16 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Uh huh... I fail to see how my ancient history has any relevance to anything. I was helping people in crisis and now you are attempting to use that against me. People like you are the reason the United States is crashing and burning in big balls of orange fire. You have lost your human core and are nothing more than a remote-controlled Zomby. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
David wrote: On 11 Mar 2006 10:21:16 -0800, "Steve" wrote: Uh huh... I fail to see how my ancient history has any relevance to anything. As much relevance as your incessant OT posts, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
If you don't like it, you're free to go elsewhere so that we can resume
discussion of SW. Junky punk. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 11:08:46 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: If you don't like it, you're free to go elsewhere so that we can resume discussion of SW. Junky punk. You attempt to hassle me when I discuss shortwave as well. Your Pavlovian technique is a lackin'. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
That's because I know the shortwave posting is the exception rather
than the rule. I wouldn't care if you made the occasional off-topic post, but you post so much crap to this group that it's virtually unreadable. That ain't right. You can get your 'viewpoint' across without undermining the overall shortwave-related purpose of the group. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 11:33:47 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: That's because I know the shortwave posting is the exception rather than the rule. I wouldn't care if you made the occasional off-topic post, but you post so much crap to this group that it's virtually unreadable. That ain't right. You can get your 'viewpoint' across without undermining the overall shortwave-related purpose of the group. Why don't you attack RHF, Peeing Eye Dog? |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
If RHFposts off-topic, it's usually in a thread that someone else (most
likely you) started. I do wish that Peeing Eye Dog would make fewer off-topic posts, but he makes fewer than you and there are only 24 hours in my day. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 12:10:49 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: If RHFposts off-topic, it's usually in a thread that someone else (most likely you) started. I do wish that Peeing Eye Dog would make fewer off-topic posts, but he makes fewer than you and there are only 24 hours in my day. So many worlds to save, so little time... |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
Pretty much, but I can save quite a few of them, since I'm not a heroin
addict. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
On 11 Mar 2006 13:36:17 -0800, "Steve"
wrote: Pretty much, but I can save quite a few of them, since I'm not a heroin addict. Are you sure? You seem hung-up, just the same. |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
Don't worry. It won't seem that way tomorrow, after you've crashed.
|
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
Could someone explain this to me: From what I've seen with mobile
passive whips, even of the longer variety, the issue of resonance seems always to be a limiting factor in band applicability. What makes this whip suitable for such a vast frequency range (30 kHz to 30 MHz)? Some coil or another? How would it be any more suitable for SW than, say, the 12 foot whip that MFJ offers? junius Steve wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html |
New vertical antenna coming to Universal
In article .com,
"junius" wrote: Could someone explain this to me: From what I've seen with mobile passive whips, even of the longer variety, the issue of resonance seems always to be a limiting factor in band applicability. What makes this whip suitable for such a vast frequency range (30 kHz to 30 MHz)? Some coil or another? How would it be any more suitable for SW than, say, the 12 foot whip that MFJ offers? junius Steve wrote: Check it out: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/sw_ant/0981.html When the antenna is at resonance it will pick up more energy from a passing EM wave than when it is not at resonance at a receive condition. On transmit it will not radiate as well either but worse is the fact that the transmit energy reflects back at the transmitter and the finals have to dissipate the extra energy. For receive efficiency you want the antenna to be full size or larger for the frequency of operation. Whip antennas need a counterpoise to work well. For a car mounted whip the ground return is the car body. For a roof mount its horizontal radials. For a portable it is the circuitry in the box and maybe you holding it. I expect a CB base antenna would work better than this unit. A CB base antenna would cost a lot less. You could do even better just hanging up a horizontal wire. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com