Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"RHF" wrote: For Tomorrow - - - The Multi-Element Dipole-on-the-Fence Antenna * Its 60 to 125 Foot Long * Its Only 4 to 5 Feet High * What Could / Would You Do To Build A Muti-Element Dipole-on-the-Fence Antenna . . . Snip What you are advocating is to tie several elements at the antenna output point together. What can happen is that power from one element can end up going down another element instead of the coax to the radio input. The trick here is to cause one elements to be high impedance when another is at resonance so the relative physical and electrical lengths of the elements must be taken into consideration. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas | Swap | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |