RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   E1 vs Sat800 review... (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/90456-e1-vs-sat800-review.html)

m II March 13th 06 04:57 AM

E1 vs Sat800 review...
 
http://www.radiointel.com/phil/e1xmvssat800.pdf

Which was found he

http://www.radiointel.com/oldnews.htm



mike

Brian Denley March 14th 06 03:21 AM

E1 vs Sat800 review...
 
m II wrote:
http://www.radiointel.com/phil/e1xmvssat800.pdf

Which was found he

http://www.radiointel.com/oldnews.htm



mike


I was unaware that 'Drake engineered' the E1. Is this true or is Phil
losing all objectivity here (we know it's a Sat800 respin)?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html



[email protected] March 14th 06 04:18 AM

E1 vs Sat800 review...
 
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:21:27 -0500, "Brian Denley"
wrote:

m II wrote:
http://www.radiointel.com/phil/e1xmvssat800.pdf

Which was found he

http://www.radiointel.com/oldnews.htm



mike


I was unaware that 'Drake engineered' the E1. Is this true or is Phil
losing all objectivity here (we know it's a Sat800 respin)?


From my quick-read of the article it seems he was referring to Drake
being responsible for the synch ..... and yes, Phil could be losing
objectivity, but if so let's hope it's temporary.

Eric F. Richards March 14th 06 03:35 PM

E1 vs Sat800 review...
 
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:21:27 -0500, "Brian Denley"
wrote:

m II wrote:
http://www.radiointel.com/phil/e1xmvssat800.pdf

Which was found he

http://www.radiointel.com/oldnews.htm



mike


I was unaware that 'Drake engineered' the E1. Is this true or is Phil
losing all objectivity here (we know it's a Sat800 respin)?


From my quick-read of the article it seems he was referring to Drake
being responsible for the synch ..... and yes, Phil could be losing
objectivity, but if so let's hope it's temporary.


Phil? *Lose* objectivity?

Mr. "My R-75 outperforms the NSA's best receivers?" THAT Phil?

Ha!

--
Eric F. Richards

"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass,
often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940

junius March 14th 06 07:23 PM

E1 vs Sat800 review...
 
I've wondered at what sort of involvement Drake had in the E1. Size
issues aside, the many similarities between the Sat 800 and the SW8 are
so undeniable; there's little doubt that Drake technology went into the
Sat 800. Such similarities, however, do not extend to any such degree
with the E1, although the sync detector on the E1 is about as good as
I've encountered. Larry Van Horn wrote in his E1 review for Monitoring
Times that "a call to Walter Hess, the technical support manager at
Eton, confirmed that Drake did have a major hand in the electronics of
this unit."

http://www.monitoringtimes.com/html/...k-etone1xm.pdf



Brian Denley wrote:
m II wrote:
http://www.radiointel.com/phil/e1xmvssat800.pdf

Which was found he

http://www.radiointel.com/oldnews.htm



mike


I was unaware that 'Drake engineered' the E1. Is this true or is Phil
losing all objectivity here (we know it's a Sat800 respin)?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com