|
voice of iran
I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best
when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! |
voice of iran
In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214
wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
"adam214" wrote in message news:1142418588.758459@teuthos... I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! I can here and watch the same propaganda on CNN. |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. Apparently Iran has only 2 or 3 English segments. One of them is the "Voice of Justice" propaganda station directed at America. The others are regular VOIRI broadcasts. If you want to hear Quran readings and prayers you can tune to Saudi Arabia's domestic service on 15170 starting at 0300. Sometimes you can even get it in California. It's all in Arabic, but Muslims pray the same around the world. |
voice of iran
In article ,
running dogg wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. Apparently Iran has only 2 or 3 English segments. One of them is the "Voice of Justice" propaganda station directed at America. The others are regular VOIRI broadcasts. If you want to hear Quran readings and prayers you can tune to Saudi Arabia's domestic service on 15170 starting at 0300. Sometimes you can even get it in California. It's all in Arabic, but Muslims pray the same around the world. Thanks for replying with the programming information. I'll have to give Iran a try. Saudi Arabia is one country I have heard the last few months as they have 500kW transmitters! Israel I have not heard. I used to get them in the past but not lately. I don't know where adam214 is located or you are located or whether you have heard Iran. This is one reason I put my location in the signature do people don't have to remember or ask. Have you heard Iran lately and how well? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
SeeingEyeDogg wrote:
"adam214" wrote... I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! I can here and watch the same propaganda on CNN. Yeah, but does your television have a synchronous detector? :) -- All relevant people are pertinent. All rude people are impertinent. Therefore, no rude people are relevant. -- Solomon W. Golomb |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. 15:30 for 1 hour in southern Australia,i think it is good to hear there *voice* instead of the voice skewed by western media that is the beauty of SW. Here is the schedule of VOI copied from my trusty passport to world band :) 0130-0230 6120,9495,9665,11875 (n america) 1030-1130 15460,15480,15600,17660 (s asia) 1530-1630 7330 9635 9940(audible in AUS) 11650 (s asia & SE asia) 1930-2030 6010 7205 7320 9800 9855 9925 11695 11860 (europe,s africa,europe) All those programs are the English ones |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote: In article , clifto wrote: SeeingEyeDogg wrote: "adam214" wrote... I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! I can here and watch the same propaganda on CNN. Yeah, but does your television have a synchronous detector? :) He can't even post on topic reply in an on topic thread. Ask him if he has a shrink. I doubt he even has a short wave radio. I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. -- Telamon Ventura, California Yes, I also wish that at least a majority of SeeingeyeDogg's posts were on the topic of SW. Dogg, please extend us that courtesy. Steve |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article , running dogg wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. Apparently Iran has only 2 or 3 English segments. One of them is the "Voice of Justice" propaganda station directed at America. The others are regular VOIRI broadcasts. If you want to hear Quran readings and prayers you can tune to Saudi Arabia's domestic service on 15170 starting at 0300. Sometimes you can even get it in California. It's all in Arabic, but Muslims pray the same around the world. Thanks for replying with the programming information. I'll have to give Iran a try. Saudi Arabia is one country I have heard the last few months as they have 500kW transmitters! Israel I have not heard. I used to get them in the past but not lately. I don't know where adam214 is located or you are located or whether you have heard Iran. This is one reason I put my location in the signature do people don't have to remember or ask. Have you heard Iran lately and how well? I am located in Sacramento, California. I have never heard the "Voice of Justice" tx. It comes on at an inconvenient time for me. The couple times that I've tried for it it has been just below the audibility threshold, meaning that it sounds like mumbling because it's not strong enough. I understand that the further east you are the easier it is to hear. I might try the VOIRI tx to Southeast Asia, but that is at an inconvenient time for me as well. As for Israel, I have never heard them in English. I have picked up their Hebrew tx, but not English. |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article 1142490732.183997@teuthos, adam214 wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. 15:30 for 1 hour in southern Australia,i think it is good to hear there *voice* instead of the voice skewed by western media that is the beauty of SW. Here is the schedule of VOI copied from my trusty passport to world band :) 0130-0230 6120,9495,9665,11875 (n america) 1030-1130 15460,15480,15600,17660 (s asia) 1530-1630 7330 9635 9940(audible in AUS) 11650 (s asia & SE asia) 1930-2030 6010 7205 7320 9800 9855 9925 11695 11860 (europe,s africa,europe) All those programs are the English ones Thanks for the schedule. I'll give it a try. I just like listening to short wave broadcasts from a distance, radios, playing with antennas and the content of course. I learned long ago to value the direct broadcast over the USA media's take on it. Listening to a direct broadcast from another country usually resulted in a very different view being expressed. Never trust just one source. The US media is controlled by a few large corporations beholden to their friends in the US govt. News is considered entertainment. Substantive news is nearly impossible to come by, as the big corporate media is too busy reporting "human interest stories". Ecuador is in chaos but the US media doesn't care. The army has dramatically stepped up its bombing of Iraq but the "investigative reporters" won't touch it. I regularly listen to the BBC for regular news and Radio Havana for stories that the US media won't touch with a 39 foot pole. |
voice of iran
In article ,
running dogg wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142490732.183997@teuthos, adam214 wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. 15:30 for 1 hour in southern Australia,i think it is good to hear there *voice* instead of the voice skewed by western media that is the beauty of SW. Here is the schedule of VOI copied from my trusty passport to world band :) 0130-0230 6120,9495,9665,11875 (n america) 1030-1130 15460,15480,15600,17660 (s asia) 1530-1630 7330 9635 9940(audible in AUS) 11650 (s asia & SE asia) 1930-2030 6010 7205 7320 9800 9855 9925 11695 11860 (europe,s africa,europe) All those programs are the English ones Thanks for the schedule. I'll give it a try. I just like listening to short wave broadcasts from a distance, radios, playing with antennas and the content of course. I learned long ago to value the direct broadcast over the USA media's take on it. Listening to a direct broadcast from another country usually resulted in a very different view being expressed. Never trust just one source. The US media is controlled by a few large corporations beholden to their friends in the US govt. News is considered entertainment. Substantive news is nearly impossible to come by, as the big corporate media is too busy reporting "human interest stories". Ecuador is in chaos but the US media doesn't care. The army has dramatically stepped up its bombing of Iraq but the "investigative reporters" won't touch it. I regularly listen to the BBC for regular news and Radio Havana for stories that the US media won't touch with a 39 foot pole. What chaos in Ecuador are you talking about? People protesting the Pan American highway and a incursion by the Colombian military chasing some drug runners doesn't sound like chaos to me. There are some election rallies or protests about trade agreements but so what? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
running dogg wrote:
Telamon wrote: In article 1142490732.183997@teuthos, adam214 wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. 15:30 for 1 hour in southern Australia,i think it is good to hear there *voice* instead of the voice skewed by western media that is the beauty of SW. Here is the schedule of VOI copied from my trusty passport to world band :) 0130-0230 6120,9495,9665,11875 (n america) 1030-1130 15460,15480,15600,17660 (s asia) 1530-1630 7330 9635 9940(audible in AUS) 11650 (s asia & SE asia) 1930-2030 6010 7205 7320 9800 9855 9925 11695 11860 (europe,s africa,europe) All those programs are the English ones Thanks for the schedule. I'll give it a try. I just like listening to short wave broadcasts from a distance, radios, playing with antennas and the content of course. I learned long ago to value the direct broadcast over the USA media's take on it. Listening to a direct broadcast from another country usually resulted in a very different view being expressed. Never trust just one source. The US media is controlled by a few large corporations beholden to their friends in the US govt. News is considered entertainment. Substantive news is nearly impossible to come by, as the big corporate media is too busy reporting "human interest stories". Ecuador is in chaos but the US media doesn't care. The army has dramatically stepped up its bombing of Iraq but the "investigative reporters" won't touch it. I regularly listen to the BBC for regular news and Radio Havana for stories that the US media won't touch with a 39 foot pole. I agree its getting like that in Australia,i listen to SW for my news whenever i can.:) |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article , running dogg wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142490732.183997@teuthos, adam214 wrote: Telamon wrote: In article 1142418588.758459@teuthos, adam214 wrote: I can get VOI on 9940, with varieing clarity and stuff usually its best when there is no interference.It is a interesting little station and if you tune in at the right time, you can hear the call to pray which is good.You have readings of the koran and news about iran it is interesting.If you are lacking decent listening i suggest you listen to this to hear a very different perspective. DISCUSS! So what time are you listening them in UTC hours? Where are you located? The middle east can be hard to get out here out he west coast. 15:30 for 1 hour in southern Australia,i think it is good to hear there *voice* instead of the voice skewed by western media that is the beauty of SW. Here is the schedule of VOI copied from my trusty passport to world band :) 0130-0230 6120,9495,9665,11875 (n america) 1030-1130 15460,15480,15600,17660 (s asia) 1530-1630 7330 9635 9940(audible in AUS) 11650 (s asia & SE asia) 1930-2030 6010 7205 7320 9800 9855 9925 11695 11860 (europe,s africa,europe) All those programs are the English ones Thanks for the schedule. I'll give it a try. I just like listening to short wave broadcasts from a distance, radios, playing with antennas and the content of course. I learned long ago to value the direct broadcast over the USA media's take on it. Listening to a direct broadcast from another country usually resulted in a very different view being expressed. Never trust just one source. The US media is controlled by a few large corporations beholden to their friends in the US govt. News is considered entertainment. Substantive news is nearly impossible to come by, as the big corporate media is too busy reporting "human interest stories". Ecuador is in chaos but the US media doesn't care. The army has dramatically stepped up its bombing of Iraq but the "investigative reporters" won't touch it. I regularly listen to the BBC for regular news and Radio Havana for stories that the US media won't touch with a 39 foot pole. What chaos in Ecuador are you talking about? People protesting the Pan American highway and a incursion by the Colombian military chasing some drug runners doesn't sound like chaos to me. There are some election rallies or protests about trade agreements but so what? Supposedly, they have the entire country shut down. Shortages of food, major highways blocked, etc. I suppose that the reports I heard, mostly over the BBC, have been exaggerated (journalists will be journalists), but it sure sounds bad. Then again it could be localized to Quito (the protests) and the reporters are indeed flying off the handle with statements like "will the system hold together long enough to have new elections?" Bolivia has this sort of thing happening in La Paz all the time and life goes on, even in the cities. |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do |
voice of iran
In article 4SsSf.4755$hc.1518@trndny03,
Whatever wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do I know this is going to be lost on you because someone of your mental caliber has no clue but on the very slim chance you might just get it this is not an off topic thread. I'm complaining about posters such as yourself that crap up the on topic threads with off topic posts. Now I know it hard for you to hold on to a thought for more than 10 seconds but give it try anyway or just go away. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do LOL!!! Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. In article 4SsSf.4755$hc.1518@trndny03, Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do Telamon wrote: I know this is going to be lost on you because someone of your mental caliber has no clue but on the very slim chance you might just get it this is not an off topic thread. I'm complaining about posters such as yourself that crap up the on topic threads with off topic posts. ....and *YOU* weren't OT with most, if not all, of those 320 posts you made???? Maybe you better try actually reviewing and re-reading them before you deny doing what you accuse others of. |
voice of iran
In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do LOL!!! Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. In article 4SsSf.4755$hc.1518@trndny03, Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do Telamon wrote: I know this is going to be lost on you because someone of your mental caliber has no clue but on the very slim chance you might just get it this is not an off topic thread. I'm complaining about posters such as yourself that crap up the on topic threads with off topic posts. ...and *YOU* weren't OT with most, if not all, of those 320 posts you made???? Maybe you better try actually reviewing and re-reading them before you deny doing what you accuse others of. And you are on topic here? What are you adding to the topic? Nothing. You could choose to be positive or negative and you chose the latter. What does that say about you? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:41:04 GMT, Whatever
wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do Wow - that is the 'Pot calling the kettle black'. Telamon - you're a real jerk that we know. Still nice to have the proof though. And it's all there... oh yea.... right there. Muhahhahhaha |
voice of iran
In article ,
toTaLhAt wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:41:04 GMT, Whatever wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do Wow - that is the 'Pot calling the kettle black'. Telamon - you're a real jerk that we know. Still nice to have the proof though. And it's all there... oh yea.... right there. Muhahhahhaha You are one funny guy. How many handles can one guy have? Want to see a real jerk look in the mirror and call him any name you want it's still you. Muhahhahhaha right back at you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do In article , "Carter, K8VT" wrote: Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". Telamon wrote: You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts. As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass". So let me try one last attempt to explain it... You say I have "a high number of off [sic] posts". My news reader shows me that I have a *total* of approximately 146 posts on this NG, some off and some on topic. The other poster (Whatever) clearly provided *proof* that *you* have 320 posts, virtually ALL off topic. Before you start slinging around accusations at others about "high numbers" of OT posts, you may want to look in the mirror (and check your calculator). Last time I looked, 320 is a bigger number than a portion of 146. Furthermore, your weak excuse/rationalization/justification for those 320 posts was because they were about "a contentious election". SO WHAT??? OT is OT, contentious or not. Are you saying *YOU* are the only one that can respond to contentious political posts and then whine and chastise others for doing the EXACT SAME THING that you have done? And do you think "contentious" is a justification for you alone? Have you considered, for example, that the war many post about may be "contentious" to them? Again, your stunning hypocrisy is shining brightly! Others here have every right to exercise the same right to post that you did 320 times. Sorry, but at this end of the circuit, you are *still* coming through loud and clear as a self-centered H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E ! To summarize, if you think a portion of 146 is a larger number of OT posts than your 320 and if you think "contentious" is an OT justification reserved only for you alone, then *you* are truly the "clueless jackass"... |
voice of iran
Shut up guys! :(, anyhoo i could get 9940 voice of iran real clear last
night at 15:30 for a good hour. |
voice of iran
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 04:19:18 GMT, Telamon
wrote: In article , toTaLhAt wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:41:04 GMT, Whatever wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do Wow - that is the 'Pot calling the kettle black'. Telamon - you're a real jerk that we know. Still nice to have the proof though. And it's all there... oh yea.... right there. Muhahhahhaha You are one funny guy. How many handles can one guy have? Want to see a real jerk look in the mirror and call him any name you want it's still you. Muhahhahhaha right back at you. Your reaction speaks volumes. Mu************* (well, you know) ..... lmao at the tard, totin' hypocrite |
voice of iran
In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do In article , "Carter, K8VT" wrote: Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". Telamon wrote: You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts. As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass". So let me try one last attempt to explain it... Snip I'm not a hypocrite. I contribute a lot of on topic and helpful posts to this news group and I don't feel the need to justify my posting history to someone with your poor posting history. Your recent AND long time posting history is most off topic political posts. This is the only post in two days so it is clear to me that you just want to ague and denigrate me so into the kill file with you. Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
In article 1142737934.919693@teuthos, adam214
wrote: Shut up guys! :(, anyhoo i could get 9940 voice of iran real clear last night at 15:30 for a good hour. Sorry about that. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
voice of iran
Telamon wrote:
In article , "Carter, K8VT" wrote: Telamon wrote: I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread. Whatever wrote: Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample. http://tinyurl.com/pz8do In article , "Carter, K8VT" wrote: Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony). I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do". Telamon wrote: You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts. As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass". So let me try one last attempt to explain it... Snip I'm not a hypocrite. I contribute a lot of on topic and helpful posts to this news group and I don't feel the need to justify my posting history to someone with your poor posting history. First, sorry to drag this thread on, but you still don't seem to get it. Next, maybe you do need to justify your posting history as this is really at the heart of the debate... * you accused and chastised me (and others) of a "high number" of OT posts. * 'Whatever' called your bluff, did some research and caught *you* with your pants down--*320* OT posts (while I have of 146 posts total, maybe 100 OT). That would seem to make *you* the winner of the "High Number" award, not others. Sort of like a guy with 320 traffic tickets calling a guy with 100 tickets a bad driver. * When you accuse people of doing something wrong and then it comes to pass that *you* have done the same "wrong" thing almost *three* times as often, then, yes, you *should* justify your posting history or be exposed for the hypocrite you are. As to your trying to justify your 320 OTs because you post on topic also--well, that's a little like a bank robber saying it's OK to rob banks because he gives some of the money to charity. NOT! OT is OT and your 320 trumps my 100. Period [.] so into the kill file with you. Plonk Thought I was already there(!) but, please, do so again. It's getting too hard to follow your illogic, denials, dodging, weaseling and bogus "justification" of *YOUR* 320 OTs. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com