DRM receiver
 

the first HiFi component for DRM radio ??

http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info...sCsid=9569501b
f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0


what do the users say ??

1599 euros...

--
een appeltje te schillen met http://applefaulty.be
http://users.fulladsl.be/spb13810/bwnl.htm
Breng je iMac G5 terug (ik wil binnen 2 jaar geen defecte 2de hands Apple kopen)
http://www.apple.com/nl/support/imac...ensionprogram/

DRM receiver
 

You can have herrrrr,,, (drm) I dont want herrr,,,,,, shes tooo
fatttt,,,,,,, shes too fattttttttt,,,,,, shes too fattttttttttt for
meeeeeeeee,,,,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin

DRM receiver
 

On 2006-04-01 10:53:32 -0800, switcher said:

the first HiFi component for DRM radio ??

http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info...sCsid=9569501b
f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0


what do the users say ??

1599 euros...

I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"

I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future
of shortwave.

--

acs

---
Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102,*FR200,*
100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop,
Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992
http://www.chevyorange.com

DRM receiver
 

AC Smith wrote:

On 2006-04-01 10:53:32 -0800, switcher said:

the first HiFi component for DRM radio ??

http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info...sCsid=9569501b
f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0


what do the users say ??

1599 euros...

I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"

I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future
of shortwave.

DRM = QRM

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DRM receiver
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
DRM = QRM

Yes, QRM to AM. Funny, in an ideal DRM SW environment, there would be 10 kHz
channel spacing, no AM signals, only DRM signals - the receiver would be
muted unless it was succesfully receiving.

Could this mean
DRM = No QRM?

How would one characterise QRM in the DRM world?
What would one do with SINPO?

Tom

DRM receiver
 

DRM? Are they even using that anymore?

DRM receiver
 

On 2006-04-01 13:01:42 -0800, dxAce said:


AC Smith wrote:

On 2006-04-01 10:53:32 -0800, switcher said:

the first HiFi component for DRM radio ??

http://www.eurodatec.de/product_info...sCsid=9569501b
f77e7d2afbe8f367f3223ec0


what do the users say ??

1599 euros...

I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"

I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future
of shortwave.

DRM = QRM

dxAce

Currently, yes. But someday, from the looks of it, DRM will =
International Broadcasting for the most part.

Believe me, I'd rather set back a few years (heck a few months when I
could still "steal" the 5975kHz BBC broadcast to Central America... but
DRM has got to get a whole heckuva a lot cheaper if it is be the
transition.

Until then, the Sat 800 will be the last SW radio I buy (well, there is
that Degen 1108 supposed to be out by the end of the year...)

acs

DRM receiver
 

On 2006-04-01 13:56:26 -0800, "Tom Holden" said:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
DRM = QRM

Yes, QRM to AM. Funny, in an ideal DRM SW environment, there would be
10 kHz channel spacing, no AM signals, only DRM signals - the receiver
would be muted unless it was succesfully receiving.

Could this mean
DRM = No QRM?

How would one characterise QRM in the DRM world?
What would one do with SINPO?

Tom

I guess there'd only be "S". Or a complete rewrite of receiving
conditions. I haven't heard a DRM signal before, I do not have a radio
with the needed 12kHz filter so I haven't even tried hooking it up to
my computer. But that defeats the whole reason I like shortwave - I
can take it with me and not have to be tied to a computer just to hear
stations.

acs

DRM receiver
 

TH - In the Digital World of DRM
SINPO is 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 ~ RHF

DRM receiver
 

On 2006-04-01 16:39:28 -0800, "RHF" said:

TH - In the Digital World of DRM
SINPO is 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 ~ RHF . . . . .

I was thinking it would either be 00000 or 555555, from what I
understand! But I get your point!

--

acs

---
Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102,*FR200,*
100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop,
Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992
http://www.chevyorange.com

DRM receiver
 

It'll go the way of AM stereo. Don't even sweat it.

DRM receiver
 

On 2 Apr 2006 00:47:17 -0800, "Han" wrote:

Hello everyone

I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
solution.
Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW
bands!

Greetings Han , the Netherlands

You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio
stations below 30 MHz
http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html

Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.

DRM receiver
 

David wrote:

On 2 Apr 2006 00:47:17 -0800, "Han" wrote:

Hello everyone

I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
solution.
Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW
bands!

Greetings Han , the Netherlands

You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio
stations below 30 MHz
http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html

Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.

Damn! You woke up retarded yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DRM receiver
 

"Han" a écrit dans le message de news:
...
| Hello everyone
|
| I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
| solution.

It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for
broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same
transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed.
Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.

DRM receiver
 

hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in.
fr.rec.radio this is french.

Thanks.


On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:54:46 +0200, "François Guillet"
wrote:


"Han" a écrit dans le message de news:
.com...
| Hello everyone
|
| I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
| solution.

It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for
broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same
transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed.
Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.

DRM receiver
 

I dont know any furrin "languages'' and I am not going to learn any of
them either.If you can't or wont speak American English Language to
me,,, Then I can not talk to you,take it or leave it.Most of the World
speaks the English Language.They have to because that is Business.
cuhulin

DRM receiver
 

DRM receiver
 

wrote in message
...

Most of the World speaks the English Language.


Wrong!

DRM receiver
 

"SeeingEyeDogg" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

Most of the World speaks the English Language.


Wrong!


I believe most of the world speaks either a dialect of Chinese or Hindi...