![]() |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:55 -0700, running dogg wrote:
I don't listen to shortwave radio for hours at a stretch. At best, I'll listen to a half hour of news on the BBC, and RHC's 10 minute news bulletin-per night. I don't listen to much music. Now tell me again, David, why I should pay $13/mo for something I'll only use for 2 1/2 hours per week (BBC doesn't have current events coverage on weekends)? That's about 80 cents an hour. Pricey. I doubt that most people listen to any more than one or two of satellite radio's dozens of channels. When Howard Stern moved to Sirius, only about a third of his over the air fan base moved with him, leading Stern to berate his former fans as cheap. Satellite radio isn't worth the cost for all but the most dedicated users. Considering that most people watch 6 hours of TV a day, cable TV is cheap. But most people don't listen to the radio for hours on end. You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC. It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. bob k5qwg |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC.
It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. bob k5qwg You get an hour of The World, not the full riches of Worldservice. Hudley Pearse |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
Anything I choose to watch on tv (I dont watch or listen to that
Crackpot stern) is better than listening to stern,and npr.It all dependes on what programs there are on tv and there are some good history and technology and science and discovey programs on tv.Next up,King of the Underworld,,, 1940 Humphrey Bogart movie. cuhulin |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
|
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
www.google.com National Public Radio Schedule Jackson Mississippi
Well,y'all can check it out if y'all wants to.I checked a couple of the sites,I didn't see any BBC listed there.I guess I will tune in the Thistle and the Shamrock (because I am Scotch Irish by ancestry,a double whammy on me) this Sunday,but I will probally forget all about it. cuhulin,the forgetfull |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
In article .com,
junius wrote: wrote: You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC. It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. bob k5qwg You get an hour of The World, not the full riches of Worldservice. Hudley Pearse Actually, it depends on the NPR affiliate station as to what, if any, BBC WS programs are carried. Actually, it's PRI affiliates. You can go to go www.pri.org, take the toolbar link for "Programs" then select "BBC World Service" in the popup menu, and that takes you to a page where you can download a pdf file schedule poster. And then you can really get ****ed off, because the PRI feed only has one half hour a day (that my local station doesn't carry) for a selection of programs from the three blocks (half hour each) that the full schedule has for science, culture, and documentary programs, each weekday. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
|
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:12:21 GMT, helmsman
wrote: One of these days or years a solar storm will toast all satellites whether for broadcast or entertainment. I personally am going to buy a tube transmiter and reciever. KG8PM It'll probably toast you too. |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
"Bob Miller" wrote in message ... On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:55 -0700, running dogg wrote: I don't listen to shortwave radio for hours at a stretch. At best, I'll listen to a half hour of news on the BBC, and RHC's 10 minute news bulletin-per night. I don't listen to much music. Now tell me again, David, why I should pay $13/mo for something I'll only use for 2 1/2 hours per week (BBC doesn't have current events coverage on weekends)? That's about 80 cents an hour. Pricey. I doubt that most people listen to any more than one or two of satellite radio's dozens of channels. When Howard Stern moved to Sirius, only about a third of his over the air fan base moved with him, leading Stern to berate his former fans as cheap. Satellite radio isn't worth the cost for all but the most dedicated users. Considering that most people watch 6 hours of TV a day, cable TV is cheap. But most people don't listen to the radio for hours on end. You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC. It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. BBC is NOT on "MOST" NPR member stations. It is on some of them, and on most of those, it is available (run by the station) only as an overnight service, a fairly cheap filler as it were. As such, it's a valuable service. But to some, it would be a really valuable service if, for example, the BBC World Service hourly news were aired every hour of the day. Don Forsling |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:45:27 GMT, helmsman
wrote: On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:07:21 GMT, David wrote: On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:12:21 GMT, helmsman wrote: One of these days or years a solar storm will toast all satellites whether for broadcast or entertainment. I personally am going to buy a tube transmiter and reciever. KG8PM It'll probably toast you too. It may but the sat's and the grid are easier to toast. Modern spacecraft are way more hardened than those built 20 years ago. |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:39:39 -0400, "Don Forsling"
wrote: "Bob Miller" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:55 -0700, running dogg wrote: I don't listen to shortwave radio for hours at a stretch. At best, I'll listen to a half hour of news on the BBC, and RHC's 10 minute news bulletin-per night. I don't listen to much music. Now tell me again, David, why I should pay $13/mo for something I'll only use for 2 1/2 hours per week (BBC doesn't have current events coverage on weekends)? That's about 80 cents an hour. Pricey. I doubt that most people listen to any more than one or two of satellite radio's dozens of channels. When Howard Stern moved to Sirius, only about a third of his over the air fan base moved with him, leading Stern to berate his former fans as cheap. Satellite radio isn't worth the cost for all but the most dedicated users. Considering that most people watch 6 hours of TV a day, cable TV is cheap. But most people don't listen to the radio for hours on end. You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC. It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. BBC is NOT on "MOST" NPR member stations. It is on some of them, and on most of those, it is available (run by the station) only as an overnight service, a fairly cheap filler as it were. As such, it's a valuable service. But to some, it would be a really valuable service if, for example, the BBC World Service hourly news were aired every hour of the day. Don Forsling Since I'm in the heathen Hill Country of central Texas, and KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m., I just figured everybody in more the civilized parts of America get what we get. Mebbe we're more cultured down here than I thunk? Bob k5qwg |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but
BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? -- Raqueeb Hassan Bangladesh |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On 6 Apr 2006 19:26:29 -0700, "Raqueeb Hassan"
wrote: KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? KUSC carries it overnight from Mount Harvard, 5,300' above Los Angeles. |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
A little teentsy weentsy chip of paint flying at about 17,000 miles per
hour in Space could conceively knock out anything,, no matter how hardened it is. cuhulin |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On 6 Apr 2006 19:26:29 -0700, "Raqueeb Hassan"
wrote: KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? KSTX is a National Public Radio station, and carries their programming, in addition to the BBC. Joan Kroc, the McDonald's hamburger widow, donated $234 million to NPR a couple of years ago, and much of the money went into news staffing, and they have good news and features programming. bob k5qwg |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:43:28 GMT, David wrote:
On 6 Apr 2006 19:26:29 -0700, "Raqueeb Hassan" wrote: KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? KUSC carries it overnight from Mount Harvard, 5,300' above Los Angeles. Wait. I think it's actually KPCC from Mt. Wilson. 6,000'. KUSC has Muzak all night. |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:40:59 GMT, David wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:43:28 GMT, David wrote: On 6 Apr 2006 19:26:29 -0700, "Raqueeb Hassan" wrote: KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? KUSC carries it overnight from Mount Harvard, 5,300' above Los Angeles. Wait. I think it's actually KPCC from Mt. Wilson. 6,000'. KUSC has Muzak all night. They clutter the view from Palomar with radio antennae? Jeez. bob k5qwg |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:00:31 GMT, Bob Miller
wrote: On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:40:59 GMT, David wrote: On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:43:28 GMT, David wrote: On 6 Apr 2006 19:26:29 -0700, "Raqueeb Hassan" wrote: KSTX plays an hour of BBC "The World" in the afternoon, and then does nothing but BBC World Service from 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. BBC seems to have good coverage in your part of the world, what else other news services KSTX carry? KUSC carries it overnight from Mount Harvard, 5,300' above Los Angeles. Wait. I think it's actually KPCC from Mt. Wilson. 6,000'. KUSC has Muzak all night. They clutter the view from Palomar with radio antennae? Jeez. bob k5qwg Palomar is 60 or 70 miles South of Mount Wilson. The RF from the towers does bother the Mount Wilson Observatory. |
PRI -verses- NPR - Public Radio for the Radio Public
MZ,
Public Radio International (PRI) -verses- National Public Radio (NPR) [ Public Radio for the Radio Public ] "PRI" = Public Radio International {The Left-Wing World First} PRI = http://www.pri.org/ Note - PRI is independent and separate from NPR. PRI's Program portfolio contains over 45 News, Arts, Culture, Music and Specials Programs. PRI PROGRAMS = http://www.pri.org/pri_programs.html "The World" -according to- PRI THE WORLD = http://www.theworld.org/ PRI's The World is a One-Hour, Week-Day Radio News Magazine offering a mix of News, Features, Interviews, and Music from around-the-globe. Note - 10 Years and still Spinning the Liberal Slanted News. SPINNING = http://www.theworld.org/about/10years.shtml "NPR" = National Public Radio {Liberal America First} NPR = http://www.npr.org/ oh shut-up and sit down rhf ~ RHF |
Shortwave radio vs satellite radio: my perspective
Bob [K5QWG] - Maybe ! :o) ~ RHF
[ Deep-in-the-Heart-of-Texas just may be part of being . . . Deep-in-the-Heart-of-the-American-Culture. ] The Nature of Culture is . . . Culture "IS" as Culture Does [.] There is Culture -and- THEN THERE IS CULTURE ! The Idea of Culture is an Abstract : Where as Culture Itself is Express By Life and Being [.] in the microscope of life - culture is the medium of our being ~ RHF |
PRI -verses- NPR - Public Radio for the Radio Public
"RHF" wrote in
oups.com: MZ, Public Radio International (PRI) -verses- National Public Radio (NPR) [ Public Radio for the Radio Public ] "PRI" = Public Radio International {The Left-Wing World First} PRI = http://www.pri.org/ Note - PRI is independent and separate from NPR. PRI's Program portfolio contains over 45 News, Arts, Culture, Music and Specials Programs. PRI PROGRAMS = http://www.pri.org/pri_programs.html "The World" -according to- PRI THE WORLD = http://www.theworld.org/ PRI's The World is a One-Hour, Week-Day Radio News Magazine offering a mix of News, Features, Interviews, and Music from around-the-globe. Note - 10 Years and still Spinning the Liberal Slanted News. SPINNING = http://www.theworld.org/about/10years.shtml "NPR" = National Public Radio {Liberal America First} NPR = http://www.npr.org/ oh shut-up and sit down rhf ~ RHF Another thing I hate. Why do they hire Faggots that seem to want to go out of their way to sound like Fags when they announce things? Friggen Homo's need to get back in the closet. |
PRI -verses- NPR - Public Radio for the Radio Public
"Slow Code" wrote in message news:oCU0g.4079 Friggen Homo's need to get back in the closet. Bull****! I came home from work one day and found a lesbian in my pantry closet and she ate all my can goods!! -- Regards B.H. Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
PRI -verses- NPR - Public Radio for the Radio Public
DaviD - Wow !
Then both your Eyes -x^x- must be Double-Crossed ~ RHF |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com