In article
,
Telamon wrote:

I will not be looking forward to this. I don't understand why the CPUC
went forward with this when BPL trials are a known problem in other
states.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...etNews&storyid
=2006-04-27T183248Z_01_N27428854_RTRUKOC_0_US-UTILITIES-BROADBAND-CALIFOR
NIA.xml&rpc=22

I filed a comment with the CPUC directed to Commissioner CHONG.

I am aghast at the decision of the CPUC to go forward with a BPL
testing in California when trials of this technology have degraded
radio communications in other states. These trials have generated many
complaints of radio interference. This flawed technology is not
fixable. Currently there is no known way to keep the digital Internet
signal to the power line and prevent radio interference. Please
reconsider allowing BPL service in California until it can be
demonstrated that the service will not interfere with radio
communications.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

You could cite articles where interference complaints have been generated in the areas of other BPL systems in the USA.

It sounds like this is only in the San Diego area for now, so I won't be able to look for interference up here in the San Francisco bay area.

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:23:59 +0000, Telamon wrote:

In article
,
Telamon wrote:

[quoted text muted]

I filed a comment with the CPUC directed to Commissioner CHONG.


Tell them you don't want all that "non-ionized" radiation entering your
your home through all the outlets cause it causes cancer.