Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BPL in California
I will not be looking forward to this. I don't understand why the CPUC
went forward with this when BPL trials are a known problem in other states. http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...etNews&storyid =2006-04-27T183248Z_01_N27428854_RTRUKOC_0_US-UTILITIES-BROADBAND-CALIFOR NIA.xml&rpc=22 -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
BPL in California
In article
, Telamon wrote: I will not be looking forward to this. I don't understand why the CPUC went forward with this when BPL trials are a known problem in other states. http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...etNews&storyid =2006-04-27T183248Z_01_N27428854_RTRUKOC_0_US-UTILITIES-BROADBAND-CALIFOR NIA.xml&rpc=22 I filed a comment with the CPUC directed to Commissioner CHONG. I am aghast at the decision of the CPUC to go forward with a BPL testing in California when trials of this technology have degraded radio communications in other states. These trials have generated many complaints of radio interference. This flawed technology is not fixable. Currently there is no known way to keep the digital Internet signal to the power line and prevent radio interference. Please reconsider allowing BPL service in California until it can be demonstrated that the service will not interfere with radio communications. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It sounds like this is only in the San Diego area for now, so I won't be able to look for interference up here in the San Francisco bay area.
__________________
weatherall :: http://cobaltpet.blogspot.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BPL in California
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:23:59 +0000, Telamon wrote:
In article , Telamon wrote: [quoted text muted] I filed a comment with the CPUC directed to Commissioner CHONG. Tell them you don't want all that "non-ionized" radiation entering your your home through all the outlets cause it causes cancer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BPL in California
"Telamon" wrote in message ... I will not be looking forward to this. I don't understand why the CPUC went forward with this when BPL trials are a known problem in other states. They allowed BPL because it's a win-no lose situation for the politicians. If BPL somehow succeeds, the politicians get to ride with Al Gore on the "helped create the internet" bandwagon. Some voters are stupid enough to believe that crap. If BPL continues to fail, the out-of-power party can't slap the in-power party with "The regulators are blocking BPL choice because they're owned by the DSL companies/cable companies/satellite companies." Some voters are ... It's been my impression that BPL has been largely a disappointment, but now I'm not so sure. Despite BPL's technical shortcomings it contiues to attract money. Perhaps this is how the "new economy" works. Sell dreams and leave the mundane business of making products to the Asians. Anyway, the American financial industry is now bigger than the American manufacturing industry. We may no longer dominate the world's production of things which actually work, but we sure can keep the money flowing, even for the damndest trekkie physics projects. And you wouldn't expect the Republicrat party to discourage fools from parting with their money, would you? Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shortwave Radio Logs from Southern California | Shortwave | |||
today live on echolink/irlp ISS qso with School in California 17:21utc | Policy | |||
DX Party Line Host Visits California!!! | Shortwave | |||
HFpack Events Pacificon 18 Oct (Shootout, Forum) California | Antenna |