Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 May 2006 12:23:17 GMT, David wrote:
''...a draft Report and Order to allow all U.S. AM stations to use HD Radio at night is reportedly sitting on the FCC Chairman's desk. Insiders say the document will allow all stations (with equipment in place) to light up simultaneously. Hopefully an interference resolution mechanism is included in the paperwork. Broadcast engineers surveyed on the floor of the NAB were not optimistic about the long-term prospects of AM HD at night, but iBiquity investors will undoubtedly make a concerted effort to make it work.'' This is as it should be. AM stations will never discover or correct nighttime IBUZ interference until they can hear it. Daytime only use of IBUZ won't work. The quality difference between AM analog and digital is more dramatic than FM, especially when loudness wars are likely to continue and the alleged quality improvement will get lost in the dust. The real advantage of the FM system isn't improved quality, it's secondary channels that will compete with their main channels for ad dollars. In 3006 when there are enough receivers to make a difference, listeners won't tolerate the dramatic drop in audio quality. That would, effectively, make all AMs using the system daytimers as listeners tune away when muddy analog comes back at 6pm.. Now is the time for stations to do whatever rebuilds they need rather than waiting until everyone has to do it at the same time. I've proposed that the first stations to make the required transmitter plant improvements be granted priority over others that might interfere with them. No station should have to modify its plant multiple times as adjacents light up. Rich |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC | Broadcasting | |||
Here is "Why" I am 'skeptical' about DRM and IBOC | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting |