DX-160
 

She is inrested in selling that radio.Dont pick on her like that,,, give
the gal a break.
cuhulin

DX-160
 

$75

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"Lisa Simpson" wrote in message
...
ok, get off the "more sensitive" thing already everybody. I never said
I
thought it would be more sensitive, I simply noted that it is not. The
sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning, it
sucks!
Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I *do* have
other
receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no need to fart with
one
that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone interested in buying a
DX-160?



Mebbe.. how much you asking?

DX-160
 

"Lisa Simpson" wrote in
:

The sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning,
it sucks! Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I
*do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no
need to fart with one that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone
interested in buying a DX-160?


Not the radio. How much for the fart?

sc

DX-160
 

Jim Hackett wrote:
"clifto" wrote...
Jim Hackett wrote:
2. Are you seriously trying to tell me that the design of the FR-200
is
newer than the design of the 535?

1. Okay.
2. The 535 was first sold in 1991. Yes, I believe the FR200 was designed
after that. If you know otherwise, please enlighten me.

You are speaking manufactured. I am speaking designed.

FR-200 single conversion analog radio ---------several decades old design
NRD-535 PLL receiver -------------------------possibly a little newer
design

You're talking concepts. Conceptually, a front end is a front end, so all
receivers would have to perform the same if you're right. I'm talking
actual design, as in determining the circuit topology and calculating the
component values, and I'm betting the FR200 didn't hit paper before 1995.
It's the actual circuit topology and component values used that actually
determine sensitivity. And incidentally, PLL designs date back to the
1970's; I still have clippings from the tech journals of that period.

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

DX-160
 

Jim Hackett wrote:
By the way, I have both the JRC and the FR-200, so I don't have to pick ;)

Go ahead, rub it in. :)

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

DX-160
 

LOL
Reminds me of the time I sold a crank-up foldover tower with 2 wenches,
(instead of winches)
Boy did I get responses from that one:-)

RoD

"signal Chaser" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Lisa Simpson" wrote in
:

The sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning,
it sucks! Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I
*do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no
need to fart with one that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone
interested in buying a DX-160?


Not the radio. How much for the fart?

sc