Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well sheesh. If the 160 was half as sensitive as you are, it'd be one hell
of a radio ![]() P.S. No thanks, I already have 3 and a DX-150... "Lisa Simpson" wrote in message ... ok, get off the "more sensitive" thing already everybody. I never said I thought it would be more sensitive, I simply noted that it is not. The sensitivity is NOT the issue! The issue is the bandspread tuning, it sucks! Especially in comparison to my other receivers, and, since I *do* have other receivers that do not have bandspread tuning, I see no need to fart with one that does. "Nuff said on that. NOW, is anyone interested in buying a DX-160? "Jim Hackett" wrote in message . net... It is NO different to tune than any other analog radio with a bandspread dial. Again, I don't know why you would have thought it would be MORE sensitive than the 394 or 302 both of which are much more modern designs. Other than...You can't believe EVERYTHING you read on the internet... ![]() Lisa Simpson" wrote in message .. . Anyone interested in a DX-160? I am considering getting rid of it, because it doesn't seem to be anymore sensitive than my DX-394 & DX-302, plus it seems too weird to tune stuff in, and I don't really need the hassle considering I have many other receivers to choose from . . . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|