Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote: Doesn't the Drake drift slightly? Not as much as you do. dxAce Michigan USA Your astounding, rapier like wit never ceases to amaze. A few more years of practice and you may well become as talented as your mentor, cuhulin... mike Dxdisgrace seems to have mimicked Cuhulin's "humping the pooch" act rather well. JB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Barnard wrote: m II wrote: dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote: Doesn't the Drake drift slightly? Not as much as you do. dxAce Michigan USA Your astounding, rapier like wit never ceases to amaze. A few more years of practice and you may well become as talented as your mentor, cuhulin... mike Dxdisgrace seems to have mimicked Cuhulin's "humping the pooch" act rather well. Ahhhhhhh... another dumbass Canuck heard from. LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 May 2006 14:38:09 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On Sun, 21 May 2006 10:36:54 -0600, "John Berenyi" wrote: I have both these rigs fully accessorized. The 515 has the sherwood filters, speaker, keypad controller, memory unit, 10-turn pot, etc. The R7A has speaker and all the Drake filters for SWLing and the RV75. I also use Sherwood's SE-3 Synch Detector with both rigs. I'm contemplating (lighlty) to sell one of them but I"m having a hard time with choosing. They are both unique in their own way. Both are 5-Star rated receivers. What do you guys think? Doesn't the Drake drift slightly? Not as much as you do. Man, I thoiught I was GPS lock steady. Can you point to a specific deviation? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Berenyi wrote: I have both these rigs fully accessorized. The 515 has the sherwood filters, speaker, keypad controller, memory unit, 10-turn pot, etc. The R7A has speaker and all the Drake filters for SWLing and the RV75. I also use Sherwood's SE-3 Synch Detector with both rigs. I'm contemplating (lighlty) to sell one of them but I"m having a hard time with choosing. They are both unique in their own way. Both are 5-Star rated receivers. What do you guys think? Tough decision. I have both. As far as performance goes, I think the R7 has the edge. The R7 has a notch filter and the 515 doesn't. The R7 has a good noise blanker, while the 515's noise blanker is generally useless. The R7 seems to be more sensitive at lower frequencies. However, the 515 is built like a tank and should last longer. My R7 has had 2 component failures already, while the 515 just keeps on truckin. New receivers come and go, yet none of them seem to have the "magic" of the R7 and 515. Maybe it's because they're both real radios instead of computers with RF circuitry thrown in. If I were you, I'd keep them both. Otherwise, it's a coin toss. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Somebody Somewhere wrote: John Berenyi wrote: I have both these rigs fully accessorized. The 515 has the sherwood filters, speaker, keypad controller, memory unit, 10-turn pot, etc. The R7A has speaker and all the Drake filters for SWLing and the RV75. I also use Sherwood's SE-3 Synch Detector with both rigs. I'm contemplating (lighlty) to sell one of them but I"m having a hard time with choosing. They are both unique in their own way. Both are 5-Star rated receivers. What do you guys think? Tough decision. I have both. As far as performance goes, I think the R7 has the edge. The R7 has a notch filter and the 515 doesn't. The R7 has a good noise blanker, while the 515's noise blanker is generally useless. The R7 seems to be more sensitive at lower frequencies. However, the 515 is built like a tank and should last longer. My R7 has had 2 component failures already, while the 515 just keeps on truckin. New receivers come and go, yet none of them seem to have the "magic" of the R7 and 515. Maybe it's because they're both real radios instead of computers with RF circuitry thrown in. Just out of curiosity, what component failures have you had? dxAce Michigan USA |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: Somebody Somewhere wrote: John Berenyi wrote: I have both these rigs fully accessorized. The 515 has the sherwood filters, speaker, keypad controller, memory unit, 10-turn pot, etc. The R7A has speaker and all the Drake filters for SWLing and the RV75. I also use Sherwood's SE-3 Synch Detector with both rigs. I'm contemplating (lighlty) to sell one of them but I"m having a hard time with choosing. They are both unique in their own way. Both are 5-Star rated receivers. What do you guys think? Tough decision. I have both. As far as performance goes, I think the R7 has the edge. The R7 has a notch filter and the 515 doesn't. The R7 has a good noise blanker, while the 515's noise blanker is generally useless. The R7 seems to be more sensitive at lower frequencies. However, the 515 is built like a tank and should last longer. My R7 has had 2 component failures already, while the 515 just keeps on truckin. New receivers come and go, yet none of them seem to have the "magic" of the R7 and 515. Maybe it's because they're both real radios instead of computers with RF circuitry thrown in. Just out of curiosity, what component failures have you had? dxAce Michigan USA Something in the band switch circuitry and something driving some of the LED segments (I forget the exact components, maybe a cap and an IC?). |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Somebody Somewhere wrote: dxAce wrote: Somebody Somewhere wrote: John Berenyi wrote: I have both these rigs fully accessorized. The 515 has the sherwood filters, speaker, keypad controller, memory unit, 10-turn pot, etc. The R7A has speaker and all the Drake filters for SWLing and the RV75. I also use Sherwood's SE-3 Synch Detector with both rigs. I'm contemplating (lighlty) to sell one of them but I"m having a hard time with choosing. They are both unique in their own way. Both are 5-Star rated receivers. What do you guys think? Tough decision. I have both. As far as performance goes, I think the R7 has the edge. The R7 has a notch filter and the 515 doesn't. The R7 has a good noise blanker, while the 515's noise blanker is generally useless. The R7 seems to be more sensitive at lower frequencies. However, the 515 is built like a tank and should last longer. My R7 has had 2 component failures already, while the 515 just keeps on truckin. New receivers come and go, yet none of them seem to have the "magic" of the R7 and 515. Maybe it's because they're both real radios instead of computers with RF circuitry thrown in. Just out of curiosity, what component failures have you had? dxAce Michigan USA Something in the band switch circuitry and something driving some of the LED segments (I forget the exact components, maybe a cap and an IC?). OK. I had a diode go out in the power supply of my original R7. dxAce Michigan USA |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As have many of us, I have settled on the R7(A) and 515 as
two of my keepers. The 515 is extraordinarily sensitive and I believe even more than the R7A. But the R7 has so many tuning options, including the amazing Passband, notch and selectivity options, that it makes DXing a breeze. I have never minded the ergonomics of the R7 that much. The addition of a RV75, which has become one of the rarest items on Ebay, improves thing a lot with the R7. Would be interest in finding out from other 515 owners if anyone has located the master oscillator adjustment pot (if there is one) as I would like to bring my 515 smack on frequency. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eton E1 Recall | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The RL Drake R8 - R8A - R8B Communication Receivers | Shortwave | |||
Read : Eton E1 Radio 'review' in 2006 Passport Word Band Radio (MORE DATA) | Shortwave | |||
The Eton 'Elite' E1 XM Radio "Genealogy" Drake SW1 > SW2 > SW8 > GS800M > E1 XM | Shortwave | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave |