![]() |
Simplex & Duplex Questions
Can someone please explain the major differences between simplex, half
duplex, full duplex, etc. ? What is there inherent in the theory that prevents two way conversation, like on a phone line, in the simplex mode (such as in maritime VHF/fm ship to shore conversations) ? Thanks, Bob |
Simplex & Duplex Questions
Robert11 wrote: Can someone please explain the major differences between simplex, half duplex, full duplex, etc. ? See http://eserver.bell.ac.uk/mirrors/dc100www/dc_014.htm What is there inherent in the theory that prevents two way conversation, like on a phone line, in the simplex mode (such as in maritime VHF/fm ship to shore conversations) ? There is nothing inherent in the theory that prevents this. It's just part of the communication system design. RK |
Simplex & Duplex Questions
"rkhalona" wrote in message oups.com... Robert11 wrote: Can someone please explain the major differences between simplex, half duplex, full duplex, etc. ? See http://eserver.bell.ac.uk/mirrors/dc100www/dc_014.htm What is there inherent in the theory that prevents two way conversation, like on a phone line, in the simplex mode (such as in maritime VHF/fm ship to shore conversations) ? There is nothing inherent in the theory that prevents this. It's just part of the communication system design. RK This would require a lot more hardware. Modern transceivers share much of the circuitry- so it cannot be used simultaneously for TX and RX. From a logistics standpoint you would obviously need 2 channels of sufficient separation to allow reasonable filters to isolate the TX from the RX- and likely separate antennas- although a single antenna may be used if more complex filters are incorporated. All in all, a lot more complexity and $$ for little benefit. Dale W4OP |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com