Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2006 12:42:56 -0400, Mike wrote: In article a, "jtaylor" wrote: Why were they needed in the first place? The 9-volt package has a lot more package and a lot less mWatthrs in it. Was it because of the voltage - did the existing solid-state tech not work so well at 3V? Probably. The very first transistor radios used a 45 volt battery! MIke Not exactly... some of the first radios with transistors in them (e.g. the Emerson 838) used a 45 volt battery. But this battery was to supply the plate B+ for the three peanut tubes in the RF/IF signal path. The transistor audio outputs ran off the 4V "A" battery which also supplied the tube heaters. Actually, I was thinking of the first all-transistor radio - specifically the Regency. But it uses a 22.5 bolt battery - my memory was faulty. IAC the point stands. Older transistor radios needed more volts because of the low efficiency germanium transistors. Mike No, early germanium signal transistors didn't handle much current. They were noisy, and had other problems that hadn't been ironed out yet. They had a lot lower e-b voltage, and could be used at lower voltages but it took a number of years to get the beta high enough to make ones that had enough gain at a lower supply voltage. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
running radio on LARGE batteries 6V 3.0 AH $9.95 N.I.B. | Shortwave | |||
Beware of cheap counterfeit batteries | Equipment | |||
Beware of cheap counterfeit batteries | General | |||
Beware of cheap counterfeit batteries | Scanner | |||
Beware of cheap counterfeit batteries | Shortwave |